Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Limited utility of diet quality scores in anthropometric prediabetes and diabetes screening models

Abstract

Background: Undiagnosed prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are major public health challenges. Machine learning tools utilizing anthropometrics effectively predict dysglycemia, but poor diet is a fundamental driver of metabolic dysfunction. This study investigates whether incorporating granular diet quality data improves digital screening tools, or if physical measurements render such data redundant.

Methods: We analyzed 20,704 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018). We evaluated 13 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2020) components from 24-hour dietary recalls against a 7-parameter anthropometric model. After Boruta feature selection, we trained Model Averaged Neural Networks and assessed discrimination (ROCAUC) and calibration on a held-out test set.

Results: Boruta identified eight HEI components (e.g., Added Sugars, Dairy) as relevant predictors. The baseline 7-parameter anthropometric model achieved robust discrimination (ROCAUC 0.796, 95% CI 0.785-0.807). Integrating either the HEI Total Score or the eight selected dietary features yielded no significant improvement (ROCAUC 0.796 for both; p > 0.05). Conversely, a diet quality-only model performed poorly (ROCAUC 0.591, 95% CI 0.577-0.605). Calibration remained strong across all models including anthropometrics. However, the diet quality-only model exhibited a limited calibration range, failing entirely to predict probability extremes (<0.273 and >0.818).

Conclusions: While diet quality is biologically critical, its addition via HEI components provides no incremental discrimination or calibration utility to screening models based on robust anthropometrics. The physical phenotype acts as a sufficient downstream integrator of metabolic history. Scalable prediabetes public health screening can primarily rely on simple, objective physical measurements, without requirement for labor-intensive dietary questionnaires.

Key messages: • Detailed diet quality data adds no predictive value to anthropometric diabetes screening tools. Public health screening can rely entirely on simple, scalable physical measurements.

• The physical phenotype acts as a robust downstream integrator of metabolic history. Anthropometric markers fully capture the diabetes risk otherwise encoded by long-term dietary habits.

Related

  1. Performance of anthropometric indices in early detection of diabetes and prediabetes in the Brazilian population: a cross-sectional study, Brazil, 2013.
    Luís Antônio Batista Tonaco, Mariana Santos Felisbino-Mendes, Alexandra Dias Moreira +4
    Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do BrasilPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  2. Limited Public Health Utility of LCT Genotyping for Lactose Intolerance Screening in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study from Türkiye
    Hatice Mutlu, Ece Eker, Fulya Çetinkaya +5
    Journal of clinical practice and researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Joint associations of sitting time and depressive symptoms with all-cause and heart disease mortality among adults with diabetes or prediabetes
    Zhi Jin, Yukun Zhang, Yuqing Li
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Non-linear association between average daily sleep duration and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes or prediabetes
    Zhimao Cai, Hualang Cai, Rui Jia +5
    Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic DisordersPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  5. Diagnostic accuracy of glycated albumin and fructosamine for detecting diabetes and prediabetes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
    Kavindya Fernando, Dulani Kottahachchi, Lochana Pasan +4
    Systematic reviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{yoo2026limited,
  title = {{Limited utility of diet quality scores in anthropometric prediabetes and diabetes screening models}},
  author = {D Yoo and T Rebelo and VK Nguyen and S Zimmerman and O Jolliet and M Nordman},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.111},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.111},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Limited utility of diet quality scores in anthropometric prediabetes and diabetes screening models
AU  - D Yoo
AU  - T Rebelo
AU  - VK Nguyen
AU  - S Zimmerman
AU  - O Jolliet
AU  - M Nordman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.111
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.111
AB  - Background: Undiagnosed prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are major public health challenges. Machine learning tools utilizing anthropometrics effectively predict dysglycemia, but poor diet is a fundamental driver of metabolic dysfunction. This study investigates whether incorporating granular diet quality data improves digital screening tools, or if physical measurements render such data redundant.  Methods: We analyzed 20,704 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018). We evaluated 13 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2020) components from 24-hour dietary recalls against a 7-parameter anthropometric model. After Boruta feature selection, we trained Model Averaged Neural Networks and assessed discrimination (ROCAUC) and calibration on a held-out test set.  Results: Boruta identified eight HEI components (e.g., Added Sugars, Dairy) as relevant predictors. The baseline 7-parameter anthropometric model achieved robust discrimination (ROCAUC 0.796, 95% CI 0.785-0.807). Integrating either the HEI Total Score or the eight selected dietary features yielded no significant improvement (ROCAUC 0.796 for both; p > 0.05). Conversely, a diet quality-only model performed poorly (ROCAUC 0.591, 95% CI 0.577-0.605). Calibration remained strong across all models including anthropometrics. However, the diet quality-only model exhibited a limited calibration range, failing entirely to predict probability extremes (<0.273 and >0.818).  Conclusions: While diet quality is biologically critical, its addition via HEI components provides no incremental discrimination or calibration utility to screening models based on robust anthropometrics. The physical phenotype acts as a sufficient downstream integrator of metabolic history. Scalable prediabetes public health screening can primarily rely on simple, objective physical measurements, without requirement for labor-intensive dietary questionnaires.  Key messages: • Detailed diet quality data adds no predictive value to anthropometric diabetes screening tools. Public health screening can rely entirely on simple, scalable physical measurements.  • The physical phenotype acts as a robust downstream integrator of metabolic history. Anthropometric markers fully capture the diabetes risk otherwise encoded by long-term dietary habits.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -