Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Morley Simplices in Higher Dimensions: Regularity, Reflections, and Counterexamples

Abstract

Trisecting the dihedral angles of an n-simplex defines its Morley simplex. We study the original simplices for which this simplex is regular. A criterion in terms of the Gram matrix of the facet normals reduces the problem to a matrix equation. The derivative of the Morley map at the regular simplex has two explicit eigenvalues, both nonzero for n≥3; thus the regular simplex is an isolated solution. We conjecture that in dimensions four and five a regular Morley simplex forces two hyperplane reflections interchanging disjoint pairs of vertices. We prove that this conclusion fails in every dimension 6≤ n≤200 and in every dimension n=binom k2−1 with k≥9: in these dimensions there are simplices with regular Morley simplex and no hyperplane reflection symmetry. The examples for 8≤ n≤200 have dihedral symmetry of order 2(n+1), while the infinite family is based on the Johnson scheme. In dimension four we give exact constructions of two nonregular examples, defined by irreducible polynomials of degrees $18$ and $8$ with Galois groups S18 and S8. Neither example is expressible by radicals. The computer assisted existence proofs use exact rational arithmetic and intervals with outward rounding.

Related

  1. The Converse Problem for the Morley Tetrahedron: Counterexamples, Conjectures, and Partial Results
    Quang Hung Tran
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. On the number of regular simplices in odd dimensions
    Felix Christian Clemen, Dingyuan Liu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. On volumes of simplices in intermediate dimensions
    José Gaitan Montejo, Eyvindur Ari Palsson
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Finite-Regularity Counterexamples to Katok's Periodic-Point Conjecture
    Nan Ding, Yao Tong
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsarXiv
  5. Semifields in prime dimensions and counterexamples to Kaplansky's conjecture
    Gábor P. Nagy, Yue Zhou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tran2026morley,
  title = {{Morley Simplices in Higher Dimensions: Regularity, Reflections, and Counterexamples}},
  author = {Quang Hung Tran},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.01216},
  eprint = {2610.01216},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01216},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Morley Simplices in Higher Dimensions: Regularity, Reflections, and Counterexamples
AU  - Quang Hung Tran
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01216
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01216
AB  - Trisecting the dihedral angles of an n-simplex defines its Morley simplex. We study the original simplices for which this simplex is regular. A criterion in terms of the Gram matrix of the facet normals reduces the problem to a matrix equation. The derivative of the Morley map at the regular simplex has two explicit eigenvalues, both nonzero for n≥3; thus the regular simplex is an isolated solution. We conjecture that in dimensions four and five a regular Morley simplex forces two hyperplane reflections interchanging disjoint pairs of vertices. We prove that this conclusion fails in every dimension 6≤ n≤200 and in every dimension n=binom k2−1 with k≥9: in these dimensions there are simplices with regular Morley simplex and no hyperplane reflection symmetry. The examples for 8≤ n≤200 have dihedral symmetry of order 2(n+1), while the infinite family is based on the Johnson scheme. In dimension four we give exact constructions of two nonregular examples, defined by irreducible polynomials of degrees $18$ and $8$ with Galois groups S_18 and S_8. Neither example is expressible by radicals. The computer assisted existence proofs use exact rational arithmetic and intervals with outward rounding.
ER  -