Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Finite-Size Limits of Adaptive Pauli Prediction

Abstract

The expectation values of a predetermined set of Pauli observables can be predicted using only a few copies of a quantum state. However, when later observables depend on earlier predictions, how the system size constrains the required number of copies remains unclear. We use classical interactive fingerprinting codes to establish this constraint. A compact Pauli-parity encoding embeds the fingerprinting interaction into the quantum prediction task, allowing any quantum prediction mechanism on the constructed diagonal states to be simulated by a classical response strategy subject to the same information constraints. We show that accurate prediction from too few copies would violate the guarantees of the fingerprinting code. For n qubits and M adaptively chosen Pauli observables, requiring all predictions to be simultaneously accurate to a fixed additive error with probability at least 2/3 yields the worst-case lower bound N*(n,M)=Ω(√(min{n,M})) on the required number of copies. For M≤ n, this lower bound matches known upper bounds. In particular, n adaptive predictions require Θ(√n) copies, whereas the same number of predetermined queries requires only O(log n) copies. This separation persists even for diagonal states and commuting observables.

Related

  1. Achievability of CSS codes performance limits over Pauli channels under separate ML decoding with bounded graphical complexity
    Gulnihal Mercanoglu, Achilleas Anastasopoulos, S. Sandeep Pradhan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Adaptive sensing beyond non-adaptive information limits: End-to-end co-design of geometry, policy, and inference
    Arvin Keshvari, William Tuxbury, Zin Lin
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  3. Why finite-size non-Hermitian eigenvalues can miss asymptotic eigenstates in topological physics
    Lucien Jezequel, Loïc Herviou, Jens Bardarson
    Physical Review BPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  4. Balancing theory uncertainties in ab initio nuclear structure calculations: Many-body truncation versus finite basis size
    L Zurek, U Vernik, P Demol +3
    HALPreprintLicence not statedNuclear physicsHAL
  5. Finite-size scaling theory of Rényi thermal entropy for second-order, first-order, and weakly first-order quantum phase transitions
    Zhe Wang, Yanzhang Zhu, Chunhao Guo +4
    Physical Review XPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.01 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossrefAPS
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026finitesize,
  title = {{Finite-Size Limits of Adaptive Pauli Prediction}},
  author = {Luofei Wang and Boyu Liu and Zihe Wang and Zhangqi Yin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13652},
  eprint = {2610.13652},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13652},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Finite-Size Limits of Adaptive Pauli Prediction
AU  - Luofei Wang
AU  - Boyu Liu
AU  - Zihe Wang
AU  - Zhangqi Yin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13652
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13652
AB  - The expectation values of a predetermined set of Pauli observables can be predicted using only a few copies of a quantum state. However, when later observables depend on earlier predictions, how the system size constrains the required number of copies remains unclear. We use classical interactive fingerprinting codes to establish this constraint. A compact Pauli-parity encoding embeds the fingerprinting interaction into the quantum prediction task, allowing any quantum prediction mechanism on the constructed diagonal states to be simulated by a classical response strategy subject to the same information constraints. We show that accurate prediction from too few copies would violate the guarantees of the fingerprinting code. For n qubits and M adaptively chosen Pauli observables, requiring all predictions to be simultaneously accurate to a fixed additive error with probability at least 2/3 yields the worst-case lower bound N^*(n,M)=Ω(√(min{n,M})) on the required number of copies. For M≤ n, this lower bound matches known upper bounds. In particular, n adaptive predictions require Θ(√n) copies, whereas the same number of predetermined queries requires only O(log n) copies. This separation persists even for diagonal states and commuting observables.
ER  -