Bullying behavior and mental health among college students in Sichuan, China: a cross-sectional study
6 affiliations
- 1School of Management, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Digital-Intelligent Disease Surveillance and Health Governance, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
- 3School of Graduate Studies, Post Graduate Centre, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
- 4School of Nursing, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
- 5International Medical School, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Malaysia
- 6Neuroscience and Mental Well-Being Centre (NeuroMIND), Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Malaysia
Abstract
Background: Bullying is a known risk factor for poor mental health in adolescents. Although bullying research has largely focused on adolescent populations, college students represent a distinct group warranting dedicated attention. They shoulder unique developmental tasks including academic competition and career preparation, and exhibit behavioral characteristics of frequent engagement with digital platforms. This study examined the prevalence of bullying and its associations with depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,120 students from August 18 to September 10, 2025. We recruited participants from a single college through class-based online channels using convenience sampling. Standardized scales assessed bullying experiences, anxiety, depression, PTSD symptoms, and psychological resilience.
Results: A total of 241(21.5%) students reported being bullied, and 101(9.0%) reported bullying others. Mann–Whitney U tests showed no significant effects of age and ethnicity on the four mental health indicators (all p > 0.05). Gender and family residence groups exhibited statistically significant differences in GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores; additionally, family residence groups differed in CD-RISC-25 scores (p < 0.05). Regression analyses indicated that traditional bullying victimization and cyberbullying victimization were significant factors associated with higher anxiety, depression and PTSD scores (β range: 0.280–0.561, all p < 0.001). Traditional bullying victimization was also associated with lower psychological resilience (β = −0.134, p = 0.009). The sensitivity analysis reveals that the inverse association observed between traditional bullying and certain indicators may be driven by suppression effects.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for campus-based mental health screening, early identification of bullying involvement, and targeted bullying prevention initiatives among university students. Specifically, given that cyberbullying victimization showed a stronger association with PTSD symptoms compared to traditional bullying, trauma-focused interventions should be prioritized for cyberbullying victims to alleviate PTSD symptoms. In contrast, traditional bullying victims may benefit from resilience enhancement programs.
Related
- Breast health information, motivation, behavioral skills, and breast self-examination behavior among female medical college students: a cross-sectional study
- Trust in HPV vaccine effectiveness and safety and willingness to initiate HPV vaccination among unvaccinated female college students recruited through university-based online networks in China: a cross-sectional study
- How physical activity relates to college students’ prosocial behavior through psychological capital and social connectedness
- Mental health damage risk, help-seeking behavior and coping strategies among young college students under different types of network media violence: a comprehensive study based on qualitative phenomenological research methodology
- The hidden burden of college life: Stress, sleep, and salivary biomarkers in students—A cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{jing2026bullying,
title = {{Bullying behavior and mental health among college students in Sichuan, China: a cross-sectional study}},
author = {Yuanyuan Jing and Ruiqing Cao and Dajun Yang and Yang Liu and Juan Zhang and Honggang Hui and Yu Yao and Yuanyuan Deng and Yuanping Zhang and Xiong Ke and Keyuan Ran and Muhammad Najib Mohamad Alwi},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1889019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1889019},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Bullying behavior and mental health among college students in Sichuan, China: a cross-sectional study
AU - Yuanyuan Jing
AU - Ruiqing Cao
AU - Dajun Yang
AU - Yang Liu
AU - Juan Zhang
AU - Honggang Hui
AU - Yu Yao
AU - Yuanyuan Deng
AU - Yuanping Zhang
AU - Xiong Ke
AU - Keyuan Ran
AU - Muhammad Najib Mohamad Alwi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1889019
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1889019
AB - Background: Bullying is a known risk factor for poor mental health in adolescents. Although bullying research has largely focused on adolescent populations, college students represent a distinct group warranting dedicated attention. They shoulder unique developmental tasks including academic competition and career preparation, and exhibit behavioral characteristics of frequent engagement with digital platforms. This study examined the prevalence of bullying and its associations with depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,120 students from August 18 to September 10, 2025. We recruited participants from a single college through class-based online channels using convenience sampling. Standardized scales assessed bullying experiences, anxiety, depression, PTSD symptoms, and psychological resilience. Results: A total of 241(21.5%) students reported being bullied, and 101(9.0%) reported bullying others. Mann–Whitney U tests showed no significant effects of age and ethnicity on the four mental health indicators (all p > 0.05). Gender and family residence groups exhibited statistically significant differences in GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores; additionally, family residence groups differed in CD-RISC-25 scores (p < 0.05). Regression analyses indicated that traditional bullying victimization and cyberbullying victimization were significant factors associated with higher anxiety, depression and PTSD scores (β range: 0.280–0.561, all p < 0.001). Traditional bullying victimization was also associated with lower psychological resilience (β = −0.134, p = 0.009). The sensitivity analysis reveals that the inverse association observed between traditional bullying and certain indicators may be driven by suppression effects. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for campus-based mental health screening, early identification of bullying involvement, and targeted bullying prevention initiatives among university students. Specifically, given that cyberbullying victimization showed a stronger association with PTSD symptoms compared to traditional bullying, trauma-focused interventions should be prioritized for cyberbullying victims to alleviate PTSD symptoms. In contrast, traditional bullying victims may benefit from resilience enhancement programs.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -