CT- and MRI-detected calcification to predict 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
6 affiliations
- 1Radiology Division, School of Medicine, Clinics’ Hospital, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Minas Gerais Brazil
- 2Laboratory of Applied Pathology and Genetics, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, 45662-900 Brazil
- 3Department of Health Science, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, 45662-900 Brazil
- 4Department of Radiology and Imaging Diagnostics, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG Brazil
- 5Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais Brazil
- 6Department of Biological Science, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, 45662- 900 Brazil
Abstract
Background: Adult diffuse lower-grade gliomas (LGGs, WHO grades 2–3) are heterogeneous CNS tumors. The 1p/19q codeletion defines oligodendrogliomas (IDHmut-Codel) and predicts better prognosis. Noninvasive imaging biomarkers could aid preoperative tumor characterization, particularly when molecular testing is limited.
Purpose: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of calcifications on CT and MRI as a predictor of 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas.
Data sources: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched up to August 2025.
Study selection: Studies evaluating calcifications on CT or MRI for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status were included, with FISH, PCR, or NGS as reference standards. Ten studies comprising 1,256 patients met inclusion criteria.
Data analysis: Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (HSROC-AUC) were calculated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis.
Data synthesis: Calcifications showed pooled sensitivity of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.38–0.53) and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88–0.95), with a DOR of 12.0 (95% CI: 6.41–22.46) and HSROC-AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.46–0.94). The high specificity indicates that the presence of calcification strongly supports 1p/19q codeletion, whereas the lower sensitivity indicates that its absence should not be used to exclude codeletion.
Limitations: Heterogeneity was related to variations in imaging protocols and difficulties differentiating calcifications from hemorrhage or microbleeds across studies.
Conclusions: Calcifications on CT and MRI are a reliable noninvasive marker for identifying IDHmut-Codel gliomas and excluding IDHmut-Noncodel tumors. Their detection provides clinically relevant information for preoperative decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings. Combining calcification assessment with other imaging features may further improve diagnostic accuracy.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16730-8.
Related
- Optimizing Immunohistochemical Surrogate Panels for 1p/19q Codeletion in IDH-Mutant Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Diagnostic Performance of Vimentin and H3K27me3
- Diagnostic Accuracy of APTw and NOEw MRI Metrics for IDH Mutation and 1p/19q Codeletion Prediction in Gliomas
- A Case of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis With Thumb‐Sized Calcification Detected on Panoramic Radiograph
- Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Opening for Enhanced Drug Delivery in Diffuse Gliomas: A Systematic Review
- Beyond the cortex, early deficits, late recovery: a systematic review of language outcomes and subcortical mapping after awake craniotomy for diffuse gliomas
BibTeX
@article{raposoneto2026mridetected,
title = {{CT- and MRI-detected calcification to predict 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
author = {José Joaquim Raposo-Neto and Guilherme Cincinato de Almeida and Isabela Milagres Guimarães and Eduarda Lemes Dias and Andrea de Martino Luppi and Luciene C G Campos},
journal = {BMC Cancer},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12885-026-16730-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16730-8},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - CT- and MRI-detected calcification to predict 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - José Joaquim Raposo-Neto
AU - Guilherme Cincinato de Almeida
AU - Isabela Milagres Guimarães
AU - Eduarda Lemes Dias
AU - Andrea de Martino Luppi
AU - Luciene C G Campos
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/12
JO - BMC Cancer
DO - 10.1186/s12885-026-16730-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16730-8
AB - Background: Adult diffuse lower-grade gliomas (LGGs, WHO grades 2–3) are heterogeneous CNS tumors. The 1p/19q codeletion defines oligodendrogliomas (IDHmut-Codel) and predicts better prognosis. Noninvasive imaging biomarkers could aid preoperative tumor characterization, particularly when molecular testing is limited. Purpose: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of calcifications on CT and MRI as a predictor of 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas. Data sources: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched up to August 2025. Study selection: Studies evaluating calcifications on CT or MRI for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status were included, with FISH, PCR, or NGS as reference standards. Ten studies comprising 1,256 patients met inclusion criteria. Data analysis: Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (HSROC-AUC) were calculated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Data synthesis: Calcifications showed pooled sensitivity of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.38–0.53) and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88–0.95), with a DOR of 12.0 (95% CI: 6.41–22.46) and HSROC-AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.46–0.94). The high specificity indicates that the presence of calcification strongly supports 1p/19q codeletion, whereas the lower sensitivity indicates that its absence should not be used to exclude codeletion. Limitations: Heterogeneity was related to variations in imaging protocols and difficulties differentiating calcifications from hemorrhage or microbleeds across studies. Conclusions: Calcifications on CT and MRI are a reliable noninvasive marker for identifying IDHmut-Codel gliomas and excluding IDHmut-Noncodel tumors. Their detection provides clinically relevant information for preoperative decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings. Combining calcification assessment with other imaging features may further improve diagnostic accuracy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16730-8.
SN - 1471-2407
ER -