Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

How accurately does L band vegetation optical depth predict aboveground biomass?

Abstract

L-band Vegetation Optical Depth (L-VOD) has emerged as a critical remote sensing proxy for monitoring global aboveground biomass (AGB) dynamics. Persistent methodological ambiguities, including the absence of standardized protocols for deriving AGB from L-VOD and the use of space-for-time assumption underpinning temporal predictions, pose challenges to the reliability of AGB estimates. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation on the current methodology using the SMOS-ICV2 L-VOD dataset and five AGB reference datasets. We find that all the existing fitting methods generally capture the AGB spatial variation, achieving 69-77 % variance explanation. Yet integrating tree cover significantly improves the AGB predictions in regions with small and medium L-VOD values. However, all methods fail to capture the spatial variation of AGB references in dense rainforests with L-VOD > 1, where the AGB reference data also show large discrepancies. Testing on space-for-time assumption reveals that spatial AGB sensitivities to L-VOD tend to be larger than temporal sensitivities. We suggest incorporating long-term in situ observations and remotely sensed vegetation structural data to understand the discrepancy between the AGB-L-VOD sensitivities and to improve AGB predictions. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of fitting methods, our results offer a cautionary tale to the use of L-VOD data to infer AGB dynamics and the necessity of developing long-term field-based biomass change datasets for further constraining and evaluating AGB predictions from remote sensing observations.

Related

  1. Terrestrial laser scanning-based aboveground biomass estimation across forest compartments in Patagonian forests: a workflow integrating freely available tools
    Romina Gonzalez Musso, Atticus Stovall, Juan H. Gowda +2
    Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. Tree height uncertainty biases aboveground biomass estimation more than wood density in miombo woodlands
    Arthur M. Yambayamba, Ferdinand Handavu, Kondwani Kapinga +1
    BiogeosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geology & geochemistryCrossref
  3. Contribution of aboveground and belowground biomass of Robinia pseudoacacia trees to total plant carbon stocks in a young agroforestry system
    Soline Martin-Blangy, Christophe Jourdan, Isabelle Bertrand +5
    Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyAtmospheric science & meteorologyHAL
  4. Reconstructing annual 30 m forest aboveground biomass across Southwest China’s karst region from 1986 to 2024
    Zezhi Yang, Xiaoxin Zhang, Xiaowei Tong
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionEarthArXiv
  5. From plot to region: canopy height-mediated mangrove aboveground biomass mapping by synergizing UAV-LiDAR and multi-source satellite data
    Yunyan Xiang, Wen H. Cai, Hongxin Su +5
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026accurately,
  title = {{How accurately does L band vegetation optical depth predict aboveground biomass?}},
  author = {Yuan Zhang and Philippe Ciais and Jean-Pierre Wigneron and Jérôme Chave and Nan Cong and Xiaojun Li and Yan Yang and Sassan Saatchi},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jag.2025.104931},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05838936v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - How accurately does L band vegetation optical depth predict aboveground biomass?
AU  - Yuan Zhang
AU  - Philippe Ciais
AU  - Jean-Pierre Wigneron
AU  - Jérôme Chave
AU  - Nan Cong
AU  - Xiaojun Li
AU  - Yan Yang
AU  - Sassan Saatchi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
DO  - 10.1016/j.jag.2025.104931
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05838936v1
AB  - L-band Vegetation Optical Depth (L-VOD) has emerged as a critical remote sensing proxy for monitoring global aboveground biomass (AGB) dynamics. Persistent methodological ambiguities, including the absence of standardized protocols for deriving AGB from L-VOD and the use of space-for-time assumption underpinning temporal predictions, pose challenges to the reliability of AGB estimates. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation on the current methodology using the SMOS-ICV2 L-VOD dataset and five AGB reference datasets. We find that all the existing fitting methods generally capture the AGB spatial variation, achieving 69-77 % variance explanation. Yet integrating tree cover significantly improves the AGB predictions in regions with small and medium L-VOD values. However, all methods fail to capture the spatial variation of AGB references in dense rainforests with L-VOD > 1, where the AGB reference data also show large discrepancies. Testing on space-for-time assumption reveals that spatial AGB sensitivities to L-VOD tend to be larger than temporal sensitivities. We suggest incorporating long-term in situ observations and remotely sensed vegetation structural data to understand the discrepancy between the AGB-L-VOD sensitivities and to improve AGB predictions. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of fitting methods, our results offer a cautionary tale to the use of L-VOD data to infer AGB dynamics and the necessity of developing long-term field-based biomass change datasets for further constraining and evaluating AGB predictions from remote sensing observations.
SN  - 1569-8432
SN  - 1872-826X
ER  -