How accurately does L band vegetation optical depth predict aboveground biomass?
Abstract
L-band Vegetation Optical Depth (L-VOD) has emerged as a critical remote sensing proxy for monitoring global aboveground biomass (AGB) dynamics. Persistent methodological ambiguities, including the absence of standardized protocols for deriving AGB from L-VOD and the use of space-for-time assumption underpinning temporal predictions, pose challenges to the reliability of AGB estimates. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation on the current methodology using the SMOS-ICV2 L-VOD dataset and five AGB reference datasets. We find that all the existing fitting methods generally capture the AGB spatial variation, achieving 69-77 % variance explanation. Yet integrating tree cover significantly improves the AGB predictions in regions with small and medium L-VOD values. However, all methods fail to capture the spatial variation of AGB references in dense rainforests with L-VOD > 1, where the AGB reference data also show large discrepancies. Testing on space-for-time assumption reveals that spatial AGB sensitivities to L-VOD tend to be larger than temporal sensitivities. We suggest incorporating long-term in situ observations and remotely sensed vegetation structural data to understand the discrepancy between the AGB-L-VOD sensitivities and to improve AGB predictions. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of fitting methods, our results offer a cautionary tale to the use of L-VOD data to infer AGB dynamics and the necessity of developing long-term field-based biomass change datasets for further constraining and evaluating AGB predictions from remote sensing observations.
Related
- Terrestrial laser scanning-based aboveground biomass estimation across forest compartments in Patagonian forests: a workflow integrating freely available tools
- Tree height uncertainty biases aboveground biomass estimation more than wood density in miombo woodlands
- Contribution of aboveground and belowground biomass of Robinia pseudoacacia trees to total plant carbon stocks in a young agroforestry system
- Reconstructing annual 30 m forest aboveground biomass across Southwest China’s karst region from 1986 to 2024
- From plot to region: canopy height-mediated mangrove aboveground biomass mapping by synergizing UAV-LiDAR and multi-source satellite data
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026accurately,
title = {{How accurately does L band vegetation optical depth predict aboveground biomass?}},
author = {Yuan Zhang and Philippe Ciais and Jean-Pierre Wigneron and Jérôme Chave and Nan Cong and Xiaojun Li and Yan Yang and Sassan Saatchi},
journal = {International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.jag.2025.104931},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05838936v1},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - How accurately does L band vegetation optical depth predict aboveground biomass?
AU - Yuan Zhang
AU - Philippe Ciais
AU - Jean-Pierre Wigneron
AU - Jérôme Chave
AU - Nan Cong
AU - Xiaojun Li
AU - Yan Yang
AU - Sassan Saatchi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
DO - 10.1016/j.jag.2025.104931
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05838936v1
AB - L-band Vegetation Optical Depth (L-VOD) has emerged as a critical remote sensing proxy for monitoring global aboveground biomass (AGB) dynamics. Persistent methodological ambiguities, including the absence of standardized protocols for deriving AGB from L-VOD and the use of space-for-time assumption underpinning temporal predictions, pose challenges to the reliability of AGB estimates. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation on the current methodology using the SMOS-ICV2 L-VOD dataset and five AGB reference datasets. We find that all the existing fitting methods generally capture the AGB spatial variation, achieving 69-77 % variance explanation. Yet integrating tree cover significantly improves the AGB predictions in regions with small and medium L-VOD values. However, all methods fail to capture the spatial variation of AGB references in dense rainforests with L-VOD > 1, where the AGB reference data also show large discrepancies. Testing on space-for-time assumption reveals that spatial AGB sensitivities to L-VOD tend to be larger than temporal sensitivities. We suggest incorporating long-term in situ observations and remotely sensed vegetation structural data to understand the discrepancy between the AGB-L-VOD sensitivities and to improve AGB predictions. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of fitting methods, our results offer a cautionary tale to the use of L-VOD data to infer AGB dynamics and the necessity of developing long-term field-based biomass change datasets for further constraining and evaluating AGB predictions from remote sensing observations.
SN - 1569-8432
SN - 1872-826X
ER -