Conversational hypnosis versus standard of care to reduce anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement under radiographic control prior to breast cancer surgery: A randomized, multicenter trial
Abstract
Background: Surgery is a cornerstone of breast cancer management. Prior to surgery, a wire marker is placed at the site of the tumor, to enable the surgeon to accurately localize the lesion during later surgery. This procedure can generate considerable anxiety for many patients. We investigated the value of conversational hypnosis (CH) in reducing anxiety in patients undergoing preoperative wire placement under radiographic control. Methods Randomized, multicentre study in 7 centers in France. Inclusion criteria were patients aged >18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, scheduled to undergo preoperative wire placement in one or several breast lesions. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by center to undergo preoperative wire placement with or without the use of CH by a radiological technician trained in the CH technique. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with an anxiety score ≥ 6 on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (absence of anxiety) to 10 (maximal anxiety). Secondary endpoints were pain score, perceived duration reported by the patient, technician satisfaction with their relationship with the patient, and ease of marker insertion reported by the radiologist. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients to assess their perception of the marker placement procedure. Results The trial was prematurely interrupted for futility after a planned interim analysis after accrual of 167 patients, i.e., half the planned sample size. Prior to marker placement, 29.3% ( n = 24) of patients in the control group had an anxiety score ≥ 6, versus 42.3% ( n = 33) in the CH group ( p = 0.08). After marker placement, the change of anxiety score was not significantly different between groups (11.0% ( n = 9) versus 14.3% ( n = 11), p = 0.615). There was no significant difference in any of the secondary endpoints. In the interviews, patients from both groups frequently spoke of a feeling of trust. Conclusion This study failed to show a benefit of conversational hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement prior to surgery for breast cancer. The fact that some caregivers had learned this personalized therapeutic communication technique may have had a positive impact on the whole caregiving team. Trial registration The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02867644).
Related
- Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting at fully covered self-expandable metal stent placement to prevent cholecystitis in malignant distal biliary obstruction: A multicenter prospective single-arm study protocol (PROTECT study)
- Evaluating the efficacy and safety of therapeutic plasma exchange in snakebite-associated thrombotic microangiopathy compared to standard care alone: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
- Individualized Or Conventional Transfusion Strategy During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support (ICONE Study): Rationale and Design of a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- Water Vapor Thermal Therapy with Rezūm Versus Combination Pharmacotherapy for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 1-Yr Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (VAPEUR-RCT)
- A New Phototherapy Regimen Coupled with Oral Vitamin D Supplementation, for the Long-Term Control of Atopic Dermatitis: A French Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover, Pragmatic Trial
BibTeX
@article{lemoine2026conversational,
title = {{Conversational hypnosis versus standard of care to reduce anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement under radiographic control prior to breast cancer surgery: A randomized, multicenter trial}},
author = {Lydie Lemoine and Virginie Adam and Xavier Galus and Pascale Siles and Agnès Coulon and Jeannette Grenier-Desforges and Joseph Orabona and Isabelle Kergastel and Pierre Wagner and Julia Salleron and Priscillia Tosti and Cécile Huin-Schohn and Jean-Louis Merlin and Rémi Etienne and Philippe Henrot},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971232},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-03893335v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Conversational hypnosis versus standard of care to reduce anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement under radiographic control prior to breast cancer surgery: A randomized, multicenter trial
AU - Lydie Lemoine
AU - Virginie Adam
AU - Xavier Galus
AU - Pascale Siles
AU - Agnès Coulon
AU - Jeannette Grenier-Desforges
AU - Joseph Orabona
AU - Isabelle Kergastel
AU - Pierre Wagner
AU - Julia Salleron
AU - Priscillia Tosti
AU - Cécile Huin-Schohn
AU - Jean-Louis Merlin
AU - Rémi Etienne
AU - Philippe Henrot
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971232
UR - https://hal.science/hal-03893335v1
AB - Background: Surgery is a cornerstone of breast cancer management. Prior to surgery, a wire marker is placed at the site of the tumor, to enable the surgeon to accurately localize the lesion during later surgery. This procedure can generate considerable anxiety for many patients. We investigated the value of conversational hypnosis (CH) in reducing anxiety in patients undergoing preoperative wire placement under radiographic control. Methods Randomized, multicentre study in 7 centers in France. Inclusion criteria were patients aged >18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, scheduled to undergo preoperative wire placement in one or several breast lesions. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by center to undergo preoperative wire placement with or without the use of CH by a radiological technician trained in the CH technique. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with an anxiety score ≥ 6 on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (absence of anxiety) to 10 (maximal anxiety). Secondary endpoints were pain score, perceived duration reported by the patient, technician satisfaction with their relationship with the patient, and ease of marker insertion reported by the radiologist. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients to assess their perception of the marker placement procedure. Results The trial was prematurely interrupted for futility after a planned interim analysis after accrual of 167 patients, i.e., half the planned sample size. Prior to marker placement, 29.3% ( n = 24) of patients in the control group had an anxiety score ≥ 6, versus 42.3% ( n = 33) in the CH group ( p = 0.08). After marker placement, the change of anxiety score was not significantly different between groups (11.0% ( n = 9) versus 14.3% ( n = 11), p = 0.615). There was no significant difference in any of the secondary endpoints. In the interviews, patients from both groups frequently spoke of a feeling of trust. Conclusion This study failed to show a benefit of conversational hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement prior to surgery for breast cancer. The fact that some caregivers had learned this personalized therapeutic communication technique may have had a positive impact on the whole caregiving team. Trial registration The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02867644).
SN - 1664-1078
ER -