Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLoS Computational Biology

The limitations of non-mechanistic methods for characterizing pathogen-pathogen interactions: A simulation study

Abstract

Pathogen-pathogen interactions occur when infection with one pathogen influences one’s chance of infection or disease due to another. Increasingly, evidence suggests that interactions are a common feature of infectious disease epidemiology. However, due to both the nonlinearities and stochasticity inherent to infectious disease transmission, and the frequency of confounding (e.g., by shared seasonal forcing), simple, correlative methods for characterizing interactions may be prone to failure. Here, we perform a simulation study to evaluate several more complex non-mechanistic approaches for inferring causality from time series data: generalized additive models (GAMs), Granger causality, transfer entropy, and convergent cross-mapping (CCM). Specifically, we use a two-pathogen mechanistic transmission model, calibrated to produce dynamics resembling outbreaks of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), to generate synthetic datasets with a range of values for interaction strength and duration. We then apply each method to all synthetic datasets. We find that Granger causality, transfer entropy, and CCM all fail to consistently infer whether data contain signal of an interaction; in particular, methods tend to incorrectly identify interactions where none are modeled (average sensitivity = 80.6%, 92.1%, 72.1%, respectively; average specificity = 31.0%, 33.3%, 33.1%). Furthermore, we find little to no association between point estimates from each method and true interaction strength. In contrast, GAMs infer the existence of interactions more accurately than the other methods (sensitivity = 85.2%, specificity = 72.5%), and consistently yield larger point estimates for stronger interactions. However, their practical utility is limited by an inability to evaluate interaction asymmetry (i.e., whether the effect of pathogen A on pathogen B is identical to that of B on A). Overall performance patterns were similar when methods were applied to two real-world datasets from Hong Kong and Canada. We conclude that accurately and comprehensively characterizing pathogen-pathogen interactions based on outbreak data remains a significant challenge. For this reason, it is critical that any proposed methods be rigorously evaluated before being used to draw conclusions about interactions.

Related

  1. Social prescribing for anxiety and depression in older adults: mechanistic pathways, implementation requirements, and limitations of current evidence
    Bo Yang, Bang He, Yang Gao +2
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Pstpip2-deficient mouse models in SAPHO syndrome research: Utility, mechanistic insights, and translational limitations
    Yu Wang, Bowen Feng, Yunuo Wang +4
    Journal of translational autoimmunityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. A Synbiotic for the Oral–Nasal Gateway: The Mechanistic Rationale, Pathogen-Targeting Profile, and Implications for Gut and Pulmonary Health
    John N. Peldyak, Paul Reynolds, César Alas Pineda +2
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Editorial: Immunology of human fungal pathogens: host-pathogen interactions, immune evasion, and therapeutic strategies
    Iván Martínez-Duncker, Andrea Regina de Souza Baptista, Héctor M. Mora Montes
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  5. Longitudinal study of a rodent invasion reveals shifts in host pathogen interactions
    Andrew Mcmanus, Maxime Galan, Nathalie Charbonnel +4
    PLoS PathogensPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyZoology & animal behaviourHAL
BibTeX
@article{kramer2026limitations,
  title = {{The limitations of non-mechanistic methods for characterizing pathogen-pathogen interactions: A simulation study}},
  author = {Sarah Kramer and Sarah Pirikahu and Cana Kussmaul and Lulla Opatowski and Matthieu Domenech de Cellès},
  journal = {PLoS Computational Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013859},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05795268v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The limitations of non-mechanistic methods for characterizing pathogen-pathogen interactions: A simulation study
AU  - Sarah Kramer
AU  - Sarah Pirikahu
AU  - Cana Kussmaul
AU  - Lulla Opatowski
AU  - Matthieu Domenech de Cellès
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/17
JO  - PLoS Computational Biology
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013859
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05795268v1
AB  - Pathogen-pathogen interactions occur when infection with one pathogen influences one’s chance of infection or disease due to another. Increasingly, evidence suggests that interactions are a common feature of infectious disease epidemiology. However, due to both the nonlinearities and stochasticity inherent to infectious disease transmission, and the frequency of confounding (e.g., by shared seasonal forcing), simple, correlative methods for characterizing interactions may be prone to failure. Here, we perform a simulation study to evaluate several more complex non-mechanistic approaches for inferring causality from time series data: generalized additive models (GAMs), Granger causality, transfer entropy, and convergent cross-mapping (CCM). Specifically, we use a two-pathogen mechanistic transmission model, calibrated to produce dynamics resembling outbreaks of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), to generate synthetic datasets with a range of values for interaction strength and duration. We then apply each method to all synthetic datasets. We find that Granger causality, transfer entropy, and CCM all fail to consistently infer whether data contain signal of an interaction; in particular, methods tend to incorrectly identify interactions where none are modeled (average sensitivity = 80.6%, 92.1%, 72.1%, respectively; average specificity = 31.0%, 33.3%, 33.1%). Furthermore, we find little to no association between point estimates from each method and true interaction strength. In contrast, GAMs infer the existence of interactions more accurately than the other methods (sensitivity = 85.2%, specificity = 72.5%), and consistently yield larger point estimates for stronger interactions. However, their practical utility is limited by an inability to evaluate interaction asymmetry (i.e., whether the effect of pathogen A on pathogen B is identical to that of B on A). Overall performance patterns were similar when methods were applied to two real-world datasets from Hong Kong and Canada. We conclude that accurately and comprehensively characterizing pathogen-pathogen interactions based on outbreak data remains a significant challenge. For this reason, it is critical that any proposed methods be rigorously evaluated before being used to draw conclusions about interactions.
SN  - 1553-734X
SN  - 1553-7358
ER  -