Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYThe European journal of general practice

Advance care planning in people with intellectual disabilities, more than 'to resuscitate or not to resuscitate': A qualitative interview study with general practitioners and family caregivers.

  1. 1Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp Research group (ELIZA), Faculty of Medicine and Health science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  2. 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, AZ Klina hospital, Brasschaat, Belgium.

Abstract

Background

Advance care planning for people (ACP) with intellectual disabilities requires timely and carefully communication between family caregivers and general practitioners.Objectives

Despite its recognised importance, little is known about how these stakeholders experience advance care planning and decision-making processes, particularly regarding goals of care and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, highlighting a critical gap in ensuring person-centred palliative care for this population.Methods

A qualitative design was used to investigate how Belgian general practitioners and family caregivers of adults (≥18 years) with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities (IQ ≤ 50) approach and experience decision-making about treatment goals and DNR directives. The data were analysed thematically.Findings

Interviews with six family caregivers and five general practitioners identified six themes: limited preparedness for ACP, the need for open discussion, communication challenges, involvement of key stakeholders, timing, and positive outcomes. Participants reported limited ACP knowledge and a need for earlier, broader conversations that extend beyond DNR decisions. Emotional barriers, uncertainty, and concerns about discussing end-of-life care too early often delayed ACP. Family caregivers generally expected GPs to initiate discussions, while both groups emphasised multidisciplinary involvement and timely, proactive conversations. Despite challenges, ACP discussions were often experienced as reassuring and helpful.Conclusions

ACP for adults with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities is shaped by knowledge gaps, communication barriers, and uncertainty about timing. Early, proactive, and multidisciplinary approaches that address personal values alongside treatment preferences may support person-centred decision-making and improve experiences of end-of-life planning.

Related

  1. Healthcare workers and caregivers’ perspectives on access to cancer screening for people with intellectual disabilities as revealed by system dynamics and group model building
    Amina Banda, Maarten Cuypers, Etiënne A.J.A. Rouwette +4
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Barriers to the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities into the Lebanese workforce: a qualitative study
    Ghassan M Khairallah, Tala Abbas, Elio Salameh +8
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Exploring How Staff Engage in Conversations Around Sexuality With Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
    Naoise Webb, Hannah O'Daly, Christine Linehan
    Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARIDPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. A Family-Inclusive, Visually Supported Sexual Abuse Prevention Intervention for Children with Moderate Intellectual Disabilities
    Türkan Akyol Güner
    Journal of Child & Adolescent TraumaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. From exclusion to later life: residential care trajectories of ageing people with intellectual disabilities in Chile
    Félix González-Carrasco, Izaskun Álvarez-Aguado
    International Journal of Developmental DisabilitiesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{grim2026advance,
  title = {{Advance care planning in people with intellectual disabilities, more than 'to resuscitate or not to resuscitate': A qualitative interview study with general practitioners and family caregivers.}},
  author = {Marnix De Grim and Jakke Hauman and Oliwia Zmysłowska and Sophie Opsomer and Johan Wens and Anke Van Dijck and Annelies Colliers},
  journal = {The European journal of general practice},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1080/13814788.2026.2745929},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42895908},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Advance care planning in people with intellectual disabilities, more than 'to resuscitate or not to resuscitate': A qualitative interview study with general practitioners and family caregivers.
AU  - Marnix De Grim
AU  - Jakke Hauman
AU  - Oliwia Zmysłowska
AU  - Sophie Opsomer
AU  - Johan Wens
AU  - Anke Van Dijck
AU  - Annelies Colliers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - The European journal of general practice
DO  - 10.1080/13814788.2026.2745929
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42895908
AB  - Background  Advance care planning for people (ACP) with intellectual disabilities requires timely and carefully communication between family caregivers and general practitioners.Objectives  Despite its recognised importance, little is known about how these stakeholders experience advance care planning and decision-making processes, particularly regarding goals of care and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, highlighting a critical gap in ensuring person-centred palliative care for this population.Methods  A qualitative design was used to investigate how Belgian general practitioners and family caregivers of adults (≥18 years) with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities (IQ ≤ 50) approach and experience decision-making about treatment goals and DNR directives. The data were analysed thematically.Findings  Interviews with six family caregivers and five general practitioners identified six themes: limited preparedness for ACP, the need for open discussion, communication challenges, involvement of key stakeholders, timing, and positive outcomes. Participants reported limited ACP knowledge and a need for earlier, broader conversations that extend beyond DNR decisions. Emotional barriers, uncertainty, and concerns about discussing end-of-life care too early often delayed ACP. Family caregivers generally expected GPs to initiate discussions, while both groups emphasised multidisciplinary involvement and timely, proactive conversations. Despite challenges, ACP discussions were often experienced as reassuring and helpful.Conclusions  ACP for adults with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities is shaped by knowledge gaps, communication barriers, and uncertainty about timing. Early, proactive, and multidisciplinary approaches that address personal values alongside treatment preferences may support person-centred decision-making and improve experiences of end-of-life planning.
SN  - 1381-4788
SN  - 1751-1402
ER  -