Facility-based assessment of caesarean section indications and outcomes in Njombe Region, Tanzania, 2024
- 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SPHSS), School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Reproductive and Child Health Directorate (RCH), Ministry of Health (MoH), Dodoma, Tanzania
- 2Ministry of Health (MoH), Dodoma, Tanzania
- 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SPHSS), School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Abstract
Introduction: Caesarean section (CS) is a critical intervention for managing maternal and neonatal complications when vaginal delivery fails. While global CS rates rose from 7% in the year 1990 to 21% in the year 2021, during which excessive reliance on CS without clear medical indications was recorded, this has raised concerns, especially in developing countries like Tanzania, where the CS rate has increased from 7% in the year 1990 up to 13% in the year 2021. This study examines the indications and outcomes of CS among women who delivered in health facilities in the Njombe region, Tanzania. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to May 2024, involving 567 post-delivery women (PDW) selected through multistage cluster sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and hospital records, focusing on demographic, clinical, and delivery details. Descriptive statistics analysis was used to analyse categorical and continuous variables. Results: The study revealed that 60.1% of CS were elective, whereby a previous caesarean scar was the most common indication (19.3%). Neonatal complications were more prevalent after CS (32.6%) compared to vaginal deliveries (14.9%), with early neonatal sepsis being the leading complication in both modes of delivery. Maternal complications after CS included postpartum haemorrhage (39.4%) and infections (30.3%), compared to a lower complication rate in vaginal deliveries (3.6%). Conclusions: Elective CS remains high, posing unnecessary risks and resource burdens. Neonatal outcomes, particularly early neonatal sepsis, highlight gaps in infection prevention and neonatal care. Maternal complications such as postpartum haemorrhage underscore the need for enhanced obstetric management during the labour and delivery period. Strengthening antenatal care to improve birth preparedness, adhering to clinical guidelines for CS, and investing in neonatal and maternal care during the labour and delivery period will help reduce unnecessary CS and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Related
- Caesarean section in Bangladesh, 2012-13 to 2025: facility birth, the private sector and small-area geography
- Facilitators and Barriers to Discharge Education for Puerperal Sepsis Prevention After Caesarean Section: A Qualitative Study at a Tertiary Health Facility in Southwestern Uganda.
- Prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia and associated factors among preterm infants aged 3–6 months attending clinics in Dodoma, Tanzania: a facility-based cross-sectional study
- Previous caesarean delivery is associated with adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes: a real-world cohort study of 26,843 singleton pregnancies
- Prevalence and age, health insurance coverage and health facility level disparities associated with mistreatment of pregnant women during childbirth services in Tanzania: analysis of demographic and health survey 2022
BibTeX
@article{masatu2026facilitybased,
title = {{Facility-based assessment of caesarean section indications and outcomes in Njombe Region, Tanzania, 2024}},
author = {Jonhas Masatu and Ismail Habib and Rogath Kishimba and Rose Mpembeni},
journal = {Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.37432/jieph-d-24-02038},
url = {https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-24-02038},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Facility-based assessment of caesarean section indications and outcomes in Njombe Region, Tanzania, 2024
AU - Jonhas Masatu
AU - Ismail Habib
AU - Rogath Kishimba
AU - Rose Mpembeni
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health
DO - 10.37432/jieph-d-24-02038
UR - https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-24-02038
AB - Introduction: Caesarean section (CS) is a critical intervention for managing maternal and neonatal complications when vaginal delivery fails. While global CS rates rose from 7% in the year 1990 to 21% in the year 2021, during which excessive reliance on CS without clear medical indications was recorded, this has raised concerns, especially in developing countries like Tanzania, where the CS rate has increased from 7% in the year 1990 up to 13% in the year 2021. This study examines the indications and outcomes of CS among women who delivered in health facilities in the Njombe region, Tanzania. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to May 2024, involving 567 post-delivery women (PDW) selected through multistage cluster sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and hospital records, focusing on demographic, clinical, and delivery details. Descriptive statistics analysis was used to analyse categorical and continuous variables. Results: The study revealed that 60.1% of CS were elective, whereby a previous caesarean scar was the most common indication (19.3%). Neonatal complications were more prevalent after CS (32.6%) compared to vaginal deliveries (14.9%), with early neonatal sepsis being the leading complication in both modes of delivery. Maternal complications after CS included postpartum haemorrhage (39.4%) and infections (30.3%), compared to a lower complication rate in vaginal deliveries (3.6%). Conclusions: Elective CS remains high, posing unnecessary risks and resource burdens. Neonatal outcomes, particularly early neonatal sepsis, highlight gaps in infection prevention and neonatal care. Maternal complications such as postpartum haemorrhage underscore the need for enhanced obstetric management during the labour and delivery period. Strengthening antenatal care to improve birth preparedness, adhering to clinical guidelines for CS, and investing in neonatal and maternal care during the labour and delivery period will help reduce unnecessary CS and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
SN - 2664-2824
ER -