Social dynamics signals in archaeological time-series: How cultural transmission and production biases shape assemblage diversity
- 1Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 2Leibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie, Mainz, Germany
Abstract
High-resolution studies on scales of decades to centuries indicate that social systems shift to greater complexity and back, a phenomenon usually referred to as social cycles. In archaeological data, such cycles are reflected in the increase and decrease of diversity in material culture signals. However, the exact correlation between assemblage diversity cycles and social complexity remains unclear. Addressing this topic, our model investigates the impact of cultural transmission and production biases on the variation in material culture sets and explains how the observable variability in empirical evidence results from the same basic complex dynamic behavior. A single mathematical algorithm describes path-dependency, gradual changes, and rapid transformations of the empirically visible assemblage composition as the replacement of components of material culture in archaeological assemblages. Our simulations capture the direct impact of short-term fluctuations and delayed sensitive dependence on the initial conditions (chaotic effects) of the assemblage diversity. The model finds a decrease in variation (standardization) in assemblages to be an outcome of production bias, potentially reflecting changes in social complexity.
Related
- Diversity in early animal communities of the Ediacaran, Avalon assemblage
- Growing disequilibria in species distributions and assemblage diversity until the end of the 21st‑century
- Diversity of anopheline species and malaria transmission dynamics in high-altitude areas of western Cameroon
- Underexplored diversity and transmission of RNA viruses in Antarctic aquatic animals
- Leveraging genomes and metagenome-assembled genomes unveils novel diversity and transmission between public transport and clinical settings in Acinetobacter
BibTeX
@article{diachenko2026social,
title = {{Social dynamics signals in archaeological time-series: How cultural transmission and production biases shape assemblage diversity}},
author = {Aleksandr Diachenko and Detlef Gronenborn},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358135},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358135},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Social dynamics signals in archaeological time-series: How cultural transmission and production biases shape assemblage diversity
AU - Aleksandr Diachenko
AU - Detlef Gronenborn
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358135
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358135
AB - High-resolution studies on scales of decades to centuries indicate that social systems shift to greater complexity and back, a phenomenon usually referred to as social cycles. In archaeological data, such cycles are reflected in the increase and decrease of diversity in material culture signals. However, the exact correlation between assemblage diversity cycles and social complexity remains unclear. Addressing this topic, our model investigates the impact of cultural transmission and production biases on the variation in material culture sets and explains how the observable variability in empirical evidence results from the same basic complex dynamic behavior. A single mathematical algorithm describes path-dependency, gradual changes, and rapid transformations of the empirically visible assemblage composition as the replacement of components of material culture in archaeological assemblages. Our simulations capture the direct impact of short-term fluctuations and delayed sensitive dependence on the initial conditions (chaotic effects) of the assemblage diversity. The model finds a decrease in variation (standardization) in assemblages to be an outcome of production bias, potentially reflecting changes in social complexity.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -