Open and endoscopic decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome: long-term clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, and comparison of anterior transposition techniques
- 1Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
- 2Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Bismil State Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
- 3Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
Abstract
Background/objective: The optimal surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) remains controversial, and comparative evidence regarding endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition is lacking. This study compared the clinical and functional outcomes of open and endoscopic decompression, evaluated open versus endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition, and identified patient-related prognostic factors associated with postoperative outcomes.
Methods: Fifty-six patients who underwent surgery for CuTS between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Nineteen patients underwent open in situ decompression and 37 underwent endoscopic decompression. Outcomes were assessed using Quick DASH, VAS, Wilson–Krout grading system, patient satisfaction, and job change. An additional comparative analysis was performed in patients requiring anterior transposition because of intraoperative ulnar nerve instability (open, n = 16; endoscopic-assisted, n = 11). Smoking, body mass index (BMI), occupation, and preoperative McGowan grade were evaluated as prognostic factors.
Results: Median follow-up was 138 months (range, 56–180) in the open group and 76 months (range, 27–156) in the endoscopic group. No statistically significant differences were detected between open and endoscopic decompression in postoperative Quick DASH, VAS, Wilson–Krout grades, patient satisfaction, job change, or complication rates. Among patients undergoing anterior transposition, median follow-up was 148 months (range, 60–180) after open transposition and 105 months (range, 50–156) after endoscopic-assisted transposition. No statistically significant differences were detected in postoperative Quick DASH, VAS or Wilson–Krout grades between patients who underwent open anterior transposition and those who underwent endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition. Increasing preoperative McGowan grade was associated with worse postoperative Quick DASH, VAS, and Wilson–Krout outcomes. Smoking and higher BMI were associated with less favorable Wilson–Krout outcomes, whereas occupation had no significant effect on postoperative recovery.
Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were detected in long-term clinical and functional outcomes between open and endoscopic decompression for CuTS. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were detected between open and endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition. Greater preoperative disease severity was associated with less favorable postoperative outcomes. Given the retrospective design and limited sample size, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence or non-inferiority between the surgical techniques.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06548-1.
Related
- Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative study involving clinical efficacy and cost analysis
- Endoscopic endonasal transcavernous posterior clinoidectomy with pituitary transposition for resection of a craniopharyngioma
- Clinical Outcomes and Feasibility of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
- Neurological deterioration after posterior decompression of an unrecognised calcified thoracic disc: recovery following endoscopic discectomy.
- Endoscopic versus non-endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
BibTeX
@article{ertem2026open,
title = {{Open and endoscopic decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome: long-term clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, and comparison of anterior transposition techniques}},
author = {Hakan Ertem and Cihad Şireci and Firat Al and Abdulkarim Alyousef and İpek Balikçi Çiçek and Kadir Ertem},
journal = {Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1007/s00402-026-06548-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06548-1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Open and endoscopic decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome: long-term clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, and comparison of anterior transposition techniques
AU - Hakan Ertem
AU - Cihad Şireci
AU - Firat Al
AU - Abdulkarim Alyousef
AU - İpek Balikçi Çiçek
AU - Kadir Ertem
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
DO - 10.1007/s00402-026-06548-1
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06548-1
AB - Background/objective: The optimal surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) remains controversial, and comparative evidence regarding endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition is lacking. This study compared the clinical and functional outcomes of open and endoscopic decompression, evaluated open versus endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition, and identified patient-related prognostic factors associated with postoperative outcomes. Methods: Fifty-six patients who underwent surgery for CuTS between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Nineteen patients underwent open in situ decompression and 37 underwent endoscopic decompression. Outcomes were assessed using Quick DASH, VAS, Wilson–Krout grading system, patient satisfaction, and job change. An additional comparative analysis was performed in patients requiring anterior transposition because of intraoperative ulnar nerve instability (open, n = 16; endoscopic-assisted, n = 11). Smoking, body mass index (BMI), occupation, and preoperative McGowan grade were evaluated as prognostic factors. Results: Median follow-up was 138 months (range, 56–180) in the open group and 76 months (range, 27–156) in the endoscopic group. No statistically significant differences were detected between open and endoscopic decompression in postoperative Quick DASH, VAS, Wilson–Krout grades, patient satisfaction, job change, or complication rates. Among patients undergoing anterior transposition, median follow-up was 148 months (range, 60–180) after open transposition and 105 months (range, 50–156) after endoscopic-assisted transposition. No statistically significant differences were detected in postoperative Quick DASH, VAS or Wilson–Krout grades between patients who underwent open anterior transposition and those who underwent endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition. Increasing preoperative McGowan grade was associated with worse postoperative Quick DASH, VAS, and Wilson–Krout outcomes. Smoking and higher BMI were associated with less favorable Wilson–Krout outcomes, whereas occupation had no significant effect on postoperative recovery. Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were detected in long-term clinical and functional outcomes between open and endoscopic decompression for CuTS. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were detected between open and endoscopic-assisted anterior transposition. Greater preoperative disease severity was associated with less favorable postoperative outcomes. Given the retrospective design and limited sample size, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence or non-inferiority between the surgical techniques. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06548-1.
SN - 0936-8051
SN - 1434-3916
ER -