Home-based telerehabilitation after CABG: higher objectively verified adherence and 12-week functional outcomes in a single-center observational cohort
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
- 2Department of Cardiac Function Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
- 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital
- 4Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Abstract
Background: Home-based telerehabilitation (HBTCR) may address access barriers to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, real-world comparative evidence on objectively verified adherence and functional recovery, with careful confounding control, remains sparse. This observational cohort study compared session completion and 12-week functional outcomes between HBTCR and CBCR in post-CABG patients using routine clinical data.
Methods: This single-center observational cohort screened 288 patients and identified 195 potentially eligible post-CABG patients (February 2024–February 2025). After excluding 28 patients with unresolved rehabilitation exposure, 167 patients (56 HBTCR, 54 CBCR, 57 usual care) formed the propensity-score estimation cohort, adjusted for 25 baseline covariates with generalized propensity scores and overlap weighting. The primary complete-case analysis included 105 patients (35 per group) with complete 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome was objectively verified session completion (% of 36 prescribed sessions). The key clinical outcome was 12-week VO ₂ peak, analyzed via weighted ANCOVA. Results are reported as adjusted differences with 95% CIs.
Results: After weighting, covariates were well balanced (all SMDs <0.10). HBTCR showed significantly higher objectively verified session completion than CBCR (87.7% vs. 78.5%; overlap-weighted difference 9.1 percentage points, 95% CI: 4.4 to 13.7; P < 0.001). The adjusted HBTCR–CBCR difference in 12-week VO ₂ peak was small and not statistically significant (0.17 mL/kg/min, 95% CI: −0.50 to 0.84; P = 0.616). Both active rehabilitation groups showed substantially larger 12-week VO ₂ peak gains than usual care (adjusted differences >4.0 mL/kg/min).
Conclusion: Among post-CABG patients who chose HBTCR or CBCR in routine practice, those choosing HBTCR had higher objectively verified session completion and comparable observed 12-week improvement in VO ₂ peak. These findings support HBTCR as a feasible option for patients who prefer or require home-based rehabilitation because of work, travel, or scheduling constraints. Formal equivalence was not tested, and the clinical meaningfulness and cost-effectiveness of this delivery model warrant further evaluation.
Related
- Barriers and facilitators to telerehabilitation adherence in young and middle-aged stroke survivors: a qualitative COM-B analysis
- Early postoperative functional exercise adherence and its association with 3-month hip functional recovery among older adults after femoral neck fracture surgery: a prospective observational study.
- Adherence-related factors associated with weight reduction: clinical outcomes of telerehabilitation in patients with metabolic syndrome
- Integrating Functional Cognitive Rehabilitation With Activity-Based Stroke Telerehabilitation: Intervention Design and Development Study.
- Measurement of Tuberculosis treatment adherence: A methodological scoping review of observational studies
BibTeX
@article{liu2026homebased,
title = {{Home-based telerehabilitation after CABG: higher objectively verified adherence and 12-week functional outcomes in a single-center observational cohort}},
author = {Yan Liu and Xugang Wang and Cuihua Wang and Minjuan Zhang and Manman Kong and Meng Wang and Jingjing Ma and Huili Liu},
journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1947232},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1947232/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Home-based telerehabilitation after CABG: higher objectively verified adherence and 12-week functional outcomes in a single-center observational cohort
AU - Yan Liu
AU - Xugang Wang
AU - Cuihua Wang
AU - Minjuan Zhang
AU - Manman Kong
AU - Meng Wang
AU - Jingjing Ma
AU - Huili Liu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1947232
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1947232/full
AB - Background: Home-based telerehabilitation (HBTCR) may address access barriers to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, real-world comparative evidence on objectively verified adherence and functional recovery, with careful confounding control, remains sparse. This observational cohort study compared session completion and 12-week functional outcomes between HBTCR and CBCR in post-CABG patients using routine clinical data. Methods: This single-center observational cohort screened 288 patients and identified 195 potentially eligible post-CABG patients (February 2024–February 2025). After excluding 28 patients with unresolved rehabilitation exposure, 167 patients (56 HBTCR, 54 CBCR, 57 usual care) formed the propensity-score estimation cohort, adjusted for 25 baseline covariates with generalized propensity scores and overlap weighting. The primary complete-case analysis included 105 patients (35 per group) with complete 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome was objectively verified session completion (% of 36 prescribed sessions). The key clinical outcome was 12-week VO ₂ peak, analyzed via weighted ANCOVA. Results are reported as adjusted differences with 95% CIs. Results: After weighting, covariates were well balanced (all SMDs <0.10). HBTCR showed significantly higher objectively verified session completion than CBCR (87.7% vs. 78.5%; overlap-weighted difference 9.1 percentage points, 95% CI: 4.4 to 13.7; P < 0.001). The adjusted HBTCR–CBCR difference in 12-week VO ₂ peak was small and not statistically significant (0.17 mL/kg/min, 95% CI: −0.50 to 0.84; P = 0.616). Both active rehabilitation groups showed substantially larger 12-week VO ₂ peak gains than usual care (adjusted differences >4.0 mL/kg/min). Conclusion: Among post-CABG patients who chose HBTCR or CBCR in routine practice, those choosing HBTCR had higher objectively verified session completion and comparable observed 12-week improvement in VO ₂ peak. These findings support HBTCR as a feasible option for patients who prefer or require home-based rehabilitation because of work, travel, or scheduling constraints. Formal equivalence was not tested, and the clinical meaningfulness and cost-effectiveness of this delivery model warrant further evaluation.
SN - 2297-055X
ER -