Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Confounding Masquerading as Improvement: A Systematic Evaluation of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Stroke Antithrombotic Treatment in a 129,000-Patient Registry

Abstract

Recent offline reinforcement learning (RL) studies report policies that outperform physician decisions on clinical outcomes. We conduct a systematic, partially crossed evaluation of five offline RL algorithm families and 14 reward designs in 44,894 post-2018 acute ischemic stroke patients from a nationwide registry (N = 129,033). Standard Fitted Q-Evaluation (FQE) yields an apparent policy-improvement estimate of +0.0069; adding an Early Neurological Deterioration penalty increases it to +0.0101. We identify reward-embedded confounding, in which a proxy terminal reward encodes baseline severity and prognosis as well as treatment efficacy. A 2 x 2 factorial analysis finds that terminal reward confounding accounts for 218.6% of the observed signal change, so its removal overshoots the null. After DML-inspired GBM reward residualization, the FQE estimate attenuates to +0.0033 (p = 0.132), and full deconfounding yields +0.0025 (p = 0.291). FQE-based diagnostics, T-learner analyses, and direct recurrence analyses converge away from a clinically meaningful aggregate improvement. A 1-year mRS factorial analysis replicates the attenuation. We provide an empirically motivated six-step evaluation checklist. NIHSS-stratified heterogeneity is hypothesis-generating for prospective trial design; hospital-level disagreement does not persist after full reward deconfounding.

Related

  1. Reinforcement Learning Under Runtime Confounding: Policy Learning and Off-Policy Evaluation
    Raphael Kim, Michele Santacatterina, Ramin Zabih +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Spatial causal inference in the presence of unmeasured confounding and interference
    Georgia Papadogeorgou, Srijata Samanta
    The Annals of Applied StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text35 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding
    Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward H. Kennedy
    The Review of Economics and StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text29 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  4. Inverse Confounding Analysis: An Exact Method for Quantifying the Significance of Confounding
    Sergey Porotsky
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. The Effect of Residual Confounding in the Analysis of Large Observational Data Sets
    S. Stanley Young, Warren B. Kindzierski
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{rhee2026confounding,
  title = {{Confounding Masquerading as Improvement: A Systematic Evaluation of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Stroke Antithrombotic Treatment in a 129,000-Patient Registry}},
  author = {Kihun Rhee},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.30442},
  eprint = {2608.30442},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30442},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Confounding Masquerading as Improvement: A Systematic Evaluation of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Stroke Antithrombotic Treatment in a 129,000-Patient Registry
AU  - Kihun Rhee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.30442
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30442
AB  - Recent offline reinforcement learning (RL) studies report policies that outperform physician decisions on clinical outcomes. We conduct a systematic, partially crossed evaluation of five offline RL algorithm families and 14 reward designs in 44,894 post-2018 acute ischemic stroke patients from a nationwide registry (N = 129,033). Standard Fitted Q-Evaluation (FQE) yields an apparent policy-improvement estimate of +0.0069; adding an Early Neurological Deterioration penalty increases it to +0.0101. We identify reward-embedded confounding, in which a proxy terminal reward encodes baseline severity and prognosis as well as treatment efficacy. A 2 x 2 factorial analysis finds that terminal reward confounding accounts for 218.6% of the observed signal change, so its removal overshoots the null. After DML-inspired GBM reward residualization, the FQE estimate attenuates to +0.0033 (p = 0.132), and full deconfounding yields +0.0025 (p = 0.291). FQE-based diagnostics, T-learner analyses, and direct recurrence analyses converge away from a clinically meaningful aggregate improvement. A 1-year mRS factorial analysis replicates the attenuation. We provide an empirically motivated six-step evaluation checklist. NIHSS-stratified heterogeneity is hypothesis-generating for prospective trial design; hospital-level disagreement does not persist after full reward deconfounding.
ER  -