Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Prevalence, acquisition, and risk factors of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales colonization in long-term care hospitals: A prospective active surveillance study

  1. 1Gyeongsangnam-do Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Changwon, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, GC Labs, Yangsan, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a critical threat to patient safety, particularly in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) where elderly patients with multiple comorbidities are concentrated. Objective: To analyze asymptomatic CRE colonization, acquisition and risk factors in LTCHs prospectively. Methods: A prospective active surveillance study was conducted on 140 patients across four LTCHs in Korea from November 2023 to December 2024. Rectal swab cultures were performed weekly for up to six weeks and at three months to isolate CRE. Prevalence, acquisition rate, time to detection, and risk factors for CRE colonization were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare acquisition patterns according to patient type, and Cox proportional-hazard models were applied to identify risk factors among patients who were CRE-negative at baseline. Results: The overall prevalence of asymptomatic CRE colonization was 24.3% (34/140). The colonization rate was higher among newly admitted patients (30.8%) compared to current inpatients (21.8%). Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) accounted for 80.0% of CRE isolates, with KPC being predominant. Among initially negative patients, 8.6% acquired CRE during hospitalization. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a dynamic pattern: current inpatients showed higher acquisition rates early on, while newly admitted patients showed higher cumulative rates after three weeks. Key risk factors included invasive device use within the past year (hazard ratio, HR: 9.83) and prior room sharing with CRE patients (HR: 5.01). Conclusions: LTCHs serve as favorable environments for both CRE importation and intra-facility transmission. Strict adherence to standard precautions, targeted screening of high-risk individuals, and prompt cohorting or isolation of CRE-positive patients are essential for effective control. These findings provide prospective evidence supporting strengthened surveillance and infection prevention strategies in long-term care settings.

Related

  1. Neonatal Unit Colonization Pressure and Acquisition of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Gut Colonization
    Aislinn Cook, Matilda Berkell, C. Henri van Werkhoven +58
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyHAL
  2. Prevalence and characterization of third-generation cephalosporin, carbapenem and colistin-resistant Enterobacterales isolated from clinical samples in Cambodia
    Gauthier Delvallez, Sokleaph Cheng, Florian Girond +9
    New Microbes and New InfectionsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND4 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  3. Apparent prevalence and performance of post-mortem inspection for bovine tuberculosis surveillance at Korhogo municipal slaughterhouse (northern Côte d'Ivoire)
    Benjamin K. M'Bari, Guillaume B. Gragnon
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourHAL
  4. Microbiological surveillance after automated reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes in routine clinical practice: A prospective randomized microbiological surveillance study
    Masayuki Kato, Hideki Hayashi, Nobuharu Hironaka +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Incidence of medically attended Lyme borreliosis across endemic regions of six European countries (BOLD): a prospective multicentre active surveillance study
    Kate Halsby, Alexandra Loew-Baselli, Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska +27
    The Lancet Regional Health - EuropePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{hwang2026prevalence,
  title = {{Prevalence, acquisition, and risk factors of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales colonization in long-term care hospitals: A prospective active surveillance study}},
  author = {Hyejin Hwang and Sunjoo Kim},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358973},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358973},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prevalence, acquisition, and risk factors of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales colonization in long-term care hospitals: A prospective active surveillance study
AU  - Hyejin Hwang
AU  - Sunjoo Kim
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358973
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358973
AB  - Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a critical threat to patient safety, particularly in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) where elderly patients with multiple comorbidities are concentrated. Objective: To analyze asymptomatic CRE colonization, acquisition and risk factors in LTCHs prospectively. Methods: A prospective active surveillance study was conducted on 140 patients across four LTCHs in Korea from November 2023 to December 2024. Rectal swab cultures were performed weekly for up to six weeks and at three months to isolate CRE. Prevalence, acquisition rate, time to detection, and risk factors for CRE colonization were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare acquisition patterns according to patient type, and Cox proportional-hazard models were applied to identify risk factors among patients who were CRE-negative at baseline. Results: The overall prevalence of asymptomatic CRE colonization was 24.3% (34/140). The colonization rate was higher among newly admitted patients (30.8%) compared to current inpatients (21.8%). Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) accounted for 80.0% of CRE isolates, with KPC being predominant. Among initially negative patients, 8.6% acquired CRE during hospitalization. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a dynamic pattern: current inpatients showed higher acquisition rates early on, while newly admitted patients showed higher cumulative rates after three weeks. Key risk factors included invasive device use within the past year (hazard ratio, HR: 9.83) and prior room sharing with CRE patients (HR: 5.01). Conclusions: LTCHs serve as favorable environments for both CRE importation and intra-facility transmission. Strict adherence to standard precautions, targeted screening of high-risk individuals, and prompt cohorting or isolation of CRE-positive patients are essential for effective control. These findings provide prospective evidence supporting strengthened surveillance and infection prevention strategies in long-term care settings.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -