Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging

Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical and Radiology Research.

  1. 1Department of RadiologyApollo Medical College HospitalAndhra PradeshIndia.
  2. 2Consultant RadiologistClarity ScansNellore.

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into medical imaging and radiology research, improving image acquisition, interpretation, workflow efficiency, and decision support. However, its rapid adoption has introduced complex legal and regulatory challenges involving patient privacy, data governance, algorithm validation, liability, intellectual property, transparency, cybersecurity, and ethical oversight. A comprehensive understanding of the evolving legal landscape is essential for the safe, effective, and legally compliant implementation of AI in radiology.Methods

A narrative review of the published literature and current regulatory guidance was conducted. Relevant international legal and regulatory frameworks governing AI in medical imaging were evaluated, including the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, General Data Protection Regulation, U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance on Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, World Health Organization recommendations, International Medical Device Regulators Forum principles, and selected national regulations. Key topics reviewed included data protection, informed consent, AI validation, regulatory approval pathways, post-market surveillance, cybersecurity, algorithmic bias, explainability, and medico-legal responsibility.Results

Current regulatory frameworks increasingly classify AI-enabled radiology software as SaMD, requiring risk-based evaluation, clinical validation, quality management systems, and continuous post-market performance monitoring. Regulatory authorities emphasize transparency, human oversight, data security, and lifecycle governance of AI systems. Nevertheless, important legal challenges remain, including liability for AI-assisted diagnostic errors, ownership of AI-generated outputs, secondary use of imaging data, cross-border data sharing, algorithmic bias, and regulation of adaptive or continuously learning AI models.Conclusions

The legal framework governing AI in radiology is evolving in parallel with technological innovation. Responsible integration of AI into clinical practice and research requires harmonized international regulations, robust data governance, standardized validation protocols, transparent algorithm development, and clearly defined legal accountability. Continued collaboration among radiologists, researchers, regulators, policymakers, industry, and legal experts will be essential to ensure that AI technologies remain safe, ethical, equitable, and trustworthy while maximizing their potential to improve patient care.

Related

  1. Perceptions of artificial intelligence for radiographic image accuracy: a cross-sectional survey of radiology personnel
    Reham Kaifi, Byadr Yamani, Rawan Almarwani +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Augmented Radiology: why map artificial intelligence in imaging from and for the Spanish-speaking world
    Federico Martín Olivera Plata
    Swiss Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Radiology: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.
    Anjali Agrawal, Fausto Labruto, Melissa A Davis
    The Indian journal of radiology & imagingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Reimagining Radiology in the Artificial Intelligence Era: The Global South Radiology AI Implementation Framework.
    Srikanth Mahankali
    The Indian journal of radiology & imagingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Preliminary Clinical Evaluation in Cross‐Sectional Imaging: A Qualitative Inquiry Into the Ethical Considerations in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
    Messiah N. K. Anudjo, Sharon Docherty, Theophilus N. Akudjedu
    Journal of Medical Radiation SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{reddy2026legal,
  title = {{Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical and Radiology Research.}},
  author = {Umamaheswara Reddy V and Susmitha S L N},
  journal = {The Indian journal of radiology \& imaging},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1055/s-0046-1829394},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921624},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical and Radiology Research.
AU  - Umamaheswara Reddy V
AU  - Susmitha S L N
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - The Indian journal of radiology & imaging
DO  - 10.1055/s-0046-1829394
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921624
AB  - Background  Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into medical imaging and radiology research, improving image acquisition, interpretation, workflow efficiency, and decision support. However, its rapid adoption has introduced complex legal and regulatory challenges involving patient privacy, data governance, algorithm validation, liability, intellectual property, transparency, cybersecurity, and ethical oversight. A comprehensive understanding of the evolving legal landscape is essential for the safe, effective, and legally compliant implementation of AI in radiology.Methods  A narrative review of the published literature and current regulatory guidance was conducted. Relevant international legal and regulatory frameworks governing AI in medical imaging were evaluated, including the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, General Data Protection Regulation, U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance on Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, World Health Organization recommendations, International Medical Device Regulators Forum principles, and selected national regulations. Key topics reviewed included data protection, informed consent, AI validation, regulatory approval pathways, post-market surveillance, cybersecurity, algorithmic bias, explainability, and medico-legal responsibility.Results  Current regulatory frameworks increasingly classify AI-enabled radiology software as SaMD, requiring risk-based evaluation, clinical validation, quality management systems, and continuous post-market performance monitoring. Regulatory authorities emphasize transparency, human oversight, data security, and lifecycle governance of AI systems. Nevertheless, important legal challenges remain, including liability for AI-assisted diagnostic errors, ownership of AI-generated outputs, secondary use of imaging data, cross-border data sharing, algorithmic bias, and regulation of adaptive or continuously learning AI models.Conclusions  The legal framework governing AI in radiology is evolving in parallel with technological innovation. Responsible integration of AI into clinical practice and research requires harmonized international regulations, robust data governance, standardized validation protocols, transparent algorithm development, and clearly defined legal accountability. Continued collaboration among radiologists, researchers, regulators, policymakers, industry, and legal experts will be essential to ensure that AI technologies remain safe, ethical, equitable, and trustworthy while maximizing their potential to improve patient care.
SN  - 0971-3026
SN  - 1998-3808
ER  -