Is painless colonoscopy associated with trainee learning? A single-center study of insertion speed and adenoma detection curves in 1,769 procedures.
- 1Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
- 2Digestive Endoscopy Center, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract
Objective
To compare the learning curves of cecal intubation time and adenoma detection rate (ADR) between painless (sedated) and conventional (non-sedated) colonoscopy performed by trainees.Methods
This single-center retrospective cohort comprised the first 1,769 colonoscopies performed by eight trainees without prior colonoscopy experience, grouped by sedation status into a conventional group (n = 852) and a painless group (n = 917). Mixed-effects models characterized the learning trajectories of cecal intubation time and ADR, and an extended model allowing a random case-order slope tested individual heterogeneity. The caseload to independent cecal intubation competency was estimated with a rolling 20-procedure success-rate threshold and Bernoulli cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.Results
Cecal intubation time was shorter in the painless group (median 6 vs. 10 min, P < 0.001). The case-order × procedure-type interaction fell from -0.113/SD (P < 0.001) in the random-intercept model to -0.027/SD (P = 0.589) in the random-slope model and was not significant under an exact trainee-level permutation test (exact P = 0.23); the overall shortening of intubation time with painless colonoscopy was robust to all specifications. Sedation status, calendar era, and scope model were highly correlated at the trainee level (r = 0.92), precluding separation of their independent effects. The overall ADR was 13.0% and declined early with experience (odds ratio 0.80/SD, P = 0.002). Fewer procedures were required to reach independent cecal intubation competency in the painless group (rolling threshold 37 vs. 114; CUSUM 107 vs. 134); however, this difference could not be separated from calendar era and equipment upgrades.Conclusion
Intubation time was shorter overall under sedation, but the faster learning of the painless group vanished once individual heterogeneity was modeled, and ADR showed no robust improvement. Sedation, era, and equipment were confounded; no causal inference regarding the effect of sedation on learning can be drawn from these data, and prospective confirmation is required. Intubation speed alone should not serve as a benchmark of overall colonoscopy competence.
Related
- Influencing factors and individualized intervention strategies for inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy in high-risk populations: a review based on the clinical practice of painless colonoscopy in China.
- Biomarker−dependent detection of contrast−associated acute kidney injury after intra−arterial contrast procedures: an exploratory randomized trial
- Machine Learning Detection of Peritoneal Entry from Vibroacoustic Signals During Veress Needle Insertion
- Beyond White-Light Colonoscopy: Water Exchange, Image-Enhanced Endoscopy, and Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection—From Single Tools to Combined Strategies: A Scoping Review
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal lesion detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BibTeX
@article{ding2026painless,
title = {{Is painless colonoscopy associated with trainee learning? A single-center study of insertion speed and adenoma detection curves in 1,769 procedures.}},
author = {Yiming Ding and Hongjuan Wang and Xiangchun Lin},
journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1965959},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898273},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Is painless colonoscopy associated with trainee learning? A single-center study of insertion speed and adenoma detection curves in 1,769 procedures.
AU - Yiming Ding
AU - Hongjuan Wang
AU - Xiangchun Lin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - Frontiers in medicine
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1965959
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898273
AB - Objective To compare the learning curves of cecal intubation time and adenoma detection rate (ADR) between painless (sedated) and conventional (non-sedated) colonoscopy performed by trainees.Methods This single-center retrospective cohort comprised the first 1,769 colonoscopies performed by eight trainees without prior colonoscopy experience, grouped by sedation status into a conventional group (n = 852) and a painless group (n = 917). Mixed-effects models characterized the learning trajectories of cecal intubation time and ADR, and an extended model allowing a random case-order slope tested individual heterogeneity. The caseload to independent cecal intubation competency was estimated with a rolling 20-procedure success-rate threshold and Bernoulli cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.Results Cecal intubation time was shorter in the painless group (median 6 vs. 10 min, P < 0.001). The case-order × procedure-type interaction fell from -0.113/SD (P < 0.001) in the random-intercept model to -0.027/SD (P = 0.589) in the random-slope model and was not significant under an exact trainee-level permutation test (exact P = 0.23); the overall shortening of intubation time with painless colonoscopy was robust to all specifications. Sedation status, calendar era, and scope model were highly correlated at the trainee level (r = 0.92), precluding separation of their independent effects. The overall ADR was 13.0% and declined early with experience (odds ratio 0.80/SD, P = 0.002). Fewer procedures were required to reach independent cecal intubation competency in the painless group (rolling threshold 37 vs. 114; CUSUM 107 vs. 134); however, this difference could not be separated from calendar era and equipment upgrades.Conclusion Intubation time was shorter overall under sedation, but the faster learning of the painless group vanished once individual heterogeneity was modeled, and ADR showed no robust improvement. Sedation, era, and equipment were confounded; no causal inference regarding the effect of sedation on learning can be drawn from these data, and prospective confirmation is required. Intubation speed alone should not serve as a benchmark of overall colonoscopy competence.
SN - 2296-858X
ER -