Comparative Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Panoramic Radiography for Presurgical Implant Planning in the Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Analysis
- 1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Best Dental Science College and Hospital, Madurai, IND
- 2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, JKKN Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, IND
Abstract
Background
Radiographic evaluation is critical in implant planning in the posterior mandible, where proximity to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle necessitates precise assessment of bone quantity, bone quality, and spatial relationships with vital anatomical structures. Panoramic radiography is widely available and cost-effective but suffers from magnification distortion and inability to depict buccolingual dimensions. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides three-dimensional (3D) information but at a higher cost and radiation exposure. Objective: This study aims to compare CBCT and panoramic radiography in terms of (i) visualization of the mandibular canal and mental foramen, (ii) visualization of the crest of the alveolar ridge and superior border of the inferior alveolar canal, and (iii) assessment of bone quantity (height and mesiodistal width) and quality (buccolingual width and density in Hounsfield units (HU)) at posterior mandibular implant sites.Methods
A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed on pre-existing radiographic records from a single academic center, comprising CBCT volumes and corresponding panoramic radiographs of the same patients with at least one posterior mandibular edentulous site. Visibility of the mandibular canal at the mental foramen and at 1, 2, and 3 cm posterior to the mental foramen was graded using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent). Visibility of the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal and crest of the alveolar ridge was similarly graded. Bone height and mesiodistal width were measured on both modalities, whereas buccolingual width and bone density (HU) were obtained only from CBCT. Results: CBCT showed significantly higher grading scores for mandibular canal visualization at all four evaluated locations (at the mental foramen and at 1, 2, and 3 cm posterior) compared with panoramic radiography. Visualization of both the crest of the alveolar ridge and the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal was also significantly better with CBCT.Conclusion
CBCT provides superior visualization of the mandibular canal in the posterior mandible, especially 2-3 cm distal to the mental foramen, and uniquely allows assessment of buccolingual bone dimensions and density, making it more suitable than panoramic radiography for presurgical implant planning in anatomically critical posterior mandibular sites. Panoramic radiography remains acceptable for routine cases with adequate vertical bone height away from vital structures, but CBCT should be considered when canal visualization is inadequate or when buccolingual and density information are required.
Related
- Comparative Evaluation of Three Endodontic File Systems for Pericervical Dentin Preservation and Canal Transportation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study
- Status of presurgical evaluation among patients with drug-resistant epilepsy identified with a computable electronic health record algorithm
- Comparative evaluation of fractal analysis and canny edge-detection algorithms for the quantification and classification of bone trabecular patterns in cone-beam computed tomography
- Evaluation of superior semicircular canal bony roof morphology and adjacent pneumatization patterns in children using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study.
- Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of furcation perforations: an in vitro comparison with periapical radiography and micro-computed tomography
BibTeX
@article{elango2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Panoramic Radiography for Presurgical Implant Planning in the Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Analysis}},
author = {Sowmiya Elango and Varun Muthuraman and Sri Sahana Ilango and Venkateshpraveen M and Vijay Thiyagarajan J and Rashmi Priyem Saravanan Vellaiappan},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.117151},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719006},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Panoramic Radiography for Presurgical Implant Planning in the Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Analysis
AU - Sowmiya Elango
AU - Varun Muthuraman
AU - Sri Sahana Ilango
AU - Venkateshpraveen M
AU - Vijay Thiyagarajan J
AU - Rashmi Priyem Saravanan Vellaiappan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.117151
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719006
AB - Background Radiographic evaluation is critical in implant planning in the posterior mandible, where proximity to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle necessitates precise assessment of bone quantity, bone quality, and spatial relationships with vital anatomical structures. Panoramic radiography is widely available and cost-effective but suffers from magnification distortion and inability to depict buccolingual dimensions. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides three-dimensional (3D) information but at a higher cost and radiation exposure. Objective: This study aims to compare CBCT and panoramic radiography in terms of (i) visualization of the mandibular canal and mental foramen, (ii) visualization of the crest of the alveolar ridge and superior border of the inferior alveolar canal, and (iii) assessment of bone quantity (height and mesiodistal width) and quality (buccolingual width and density in Hounsfield units (HU)) at posterior mandibular implant sites.Methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed on pre-existing radiographic records from a single academic center, comprising CBCT volumes and corresponding panoramic radiographs of the same patients with at least one posterior mandibular edentulous site. Visibility of the mandibular canal at the mental foramen and at 1, 2, and 3 cm posterior to the mental foramen was graded using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent). Visibility of the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal and crest of the alveolar ridge was similarly graded. Bone height and mesiodistal width were measured on both modalities, whereas buccolingual width and bone density (HU) were obtained only from CBCT. Results: CBCT showed significantly higher grading scores for mandibular canal visualization at all four evaluated locations (at the mental foramen and at 1, 2, and 3 cm posterior) compared with panoramic radiography. Visualization of both the crest of the alveolar ridge and the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal was also significantly better with CBCT.Conclusion CBCT provides superior visualization of the mandibular canal in the posterior mandible, especially 2-3 cm distal to the mental foramen, and uniquely allows assessment of buccolingual bone dimensions and density, making it more suitable than panoramic radiography for presurgical implant planning in anatomically critical posterior mandibular sites. Panoramic radiography remains acceptable for routine cases with adequate vertical bone height away from vital structures, but CBCT should be considered when canal visualization is inadequate or when buccolingual and density information are required.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -