Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of affective disorders

Does Ecological Momentary Assessment Improve Prediction of Suicide Risk Among Military Personnel and Veterans, and How Frequent Should It Be?

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Suicidal risk fluctuates rapidly, yet suicide monitoring primarily relies on retrospective assessments. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a promising approach for capturing real-time fluctuations in suicidal urges and identifying elevated suicidal risks beyond clinical settings, but poses substantial participant burden. This study aimed to examine the incremental predictive value of EMA and its optimal sampling frequency. METHODS: Military service members and veterans (N = 62) with recent suicidal ideation or attempts received outpatient psychotherapy weekly. Participants completed measures of suicidal ideation at each session and four daily EMA surveys of suicidal urges over 28 days. Mixed-effects models examined whether EMA-assessed suicidal urges during the inter-session window predicted suicidal ideation at the subsequent therapy session beyond retrospective measures. We simulated reduced EMA frequencies by probabilistically thinning EMA observations and re-estimated model performance with different EMA frequencies. RESULTS: Both the mean and maximum levels of EMA-assessed suicidal urges significantly improved the prediction of next-session suicidal ideation beyond prior session-based measures (p < .001). Simulation analyses revealed a nonlinear relationship between EMA frequency and its predictive utility. The predictive utility of EMA remained nearly unchanged as sampling frequency decreased from highly frequent (twice per day) to moderately frequent (once every other day) schedules but declined more sharply with further reductions in EMA frequency. CONCLUSIONS: EMA enhanced the prediction of near-term suicidal risks beyond session-based assessments. Moderate EMA sampling frequencies (once every other day) may preserve most predictive utility while reducing participant burden, offering a practical approach for scalable suicide monitoring in clinical populations.

Related

  1. Leveraging ecological momentary assessment and dynamic structural equation modeling to identify idiographic antecedents of child irritability and defiance
    Shannon Shaughnessy, Spencer C. Evans
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  2. Ecological momentary assessment of anxiety and depression in individuals with early-treated phenylketonuria
    Braden E. Hayse, Sean P. Lane, Shifali Singh +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxivPMC
  3. An Experimental Evaluation of Assessment Reactivity in Ecological Momentary Assessment of Alcoholics Anonymous Involvement and Alcohol-Related Outcomes: One Day at a Time
    Mason L. Hatwan, Matthew R. Pearson, J. Scott Tonigan
    Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive BehaviorsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  4. Baseline depressive-symptom severity and divergent psychological trajectories during GIP and/or GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy: a prospective ecological momentary assessment study
    Aika Miya, Michihiro Kaneko, Yuka Ozaki +2
    Diabetology internationalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  5. Sleep and the Daytime Course of Anhedonia in Adolescent Depression: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
    Hannah E. Marshall, Linda Nduka, Tahjanee Givens +6
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@article{lin2026does,
  title = {{Does Ecological Momentary Assessment Improve Prediction of Suicide Risk Among Military Personnel and Veterans, and How Frequent Should It Be?}},
  author = {Tao Lin and Leo Rosaz Shariyf and Marin Kautz and Justin C. Baker and Lauren Khazem and Craig J. Bryan and Lily A. Brown},
  journal = {Journal of affective disorders},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jad.2026.122133},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122133},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Does Ecological Momentary Assessment Improve Prediction of Suicide Risk Among Military Personnel and Veterans, and How Frequent Should It Be?
AU  - Tao Lin
AU  - Leo Rosaz Shariyf
AU  - Marin Kautz
AU  - Justin C. Baker
AU  - Lauren Khazem
AU  - Craig J. Bryan
AU  - Lily A. Brown
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/17
JO  - Journal of affective disorders
DO  - 10.1016/j.jad.2026.122133
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122133
AB  - OBJECTIVES: Suicidal risk fluctuates rapidly, yet suicide monitoring primarily relies on retrospective assessments. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a promising approach for capturing real-time fluctuations in suicidal urges and identifying elevated suicidal risks beyond clinical settings, but poses substantial participant burden. This study aimed to examine the incremental predictive value of EMA and its optimal sampling frequency. METHODS: Military service members and veterans (N = 62) with recent suicidal ideation or attempts received outpatient psychotherapy weekly. Participants completed measures of suicidal ideation at each session and four daily EMA surveys of suicidal urges over 28 days. Mixed-effects models examined whether EMA-assessed suicidal urges during the inter-session window predicted suicidal ideation at the subsequent therapy session beyond retrospective measures. We simulated reduced EMA frequencies by probabilistically thinning EMA observations and re-estimated model performance with different EMA frequencies. RESULTS: Both the mean and maximum levels of EMA-assessed suicidal urges significantly improved the prediction of next-session suicidal ideation beyond prior session-based measures (p < .001). Simulation analyses revealed a nonlinear relationship between EMA frequency and its predictive utility. The predictive utility of EMA remained nearly unchanged as sampling frequency decreased from highly frequent (twice per day) to moderately frequent (once every other day) schedules but declined more sharply with further reductions in EMA frequency. CONCLUSIONS: EMA enhanced the prediction of near-term suicidal risks beyond session-based assessments. Moderate EMA sampling frequencies (once every other day) may preserve most predictive utility while reducing participant burden, offering a practical approach for scalable suicide monitoring in clinical populations.
SN  - 0165-0327
SN  - 1573-2517
ER  -