Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Optimizing Geoengineering Interventions Using Differentiable Climate Models

Abstract

The deployment of a geoengineering program to cool Earth's climate may be imminent. It is crucial that tools be developed to ensure that such a program would achieve its objectives while minimizing disruption. Here we exploit recently developed differentiable atmospheric models to demonstrate a novel geoengineering control strategy. In the differentiable primitive-equation atmospheric model JAX-GCM we impose a uniform +4\,K ocean warming and ask what pattern of sea-surface temperature cooling -- in five ocean-masked zonal bands of prescribed SST forcings whose amplitudes are free -- returns land near-surface air temperature closest to the model's own unwarmed climatology. This idealized set-up represents a cooling pattern that could be delivered physically either by marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection. Gradients through chaotic dynamics decorrelate from the true sensitivity beyond the Lyapunov horizon, so we optimize greedily over segments of 8 to 14 days, following receding-horizon control. The learned strategy removes 92.3 ± 0.4% of the realized land warming across a ten-member ensemble of two-year rollouts, and a three-year run sustains it. If we use the spatial pattern of land temperature as the optimization objective, the distributions of precipitation, evaporation, and specific humidity over land are restored as well, even though they are not included in the objective function. The learned strategy from JAX-GCM replayed in the AI emulators LUCIE and NeuralGCM without re-optimization is successful, suggesting robustness. These promising results demonstrate a strategy for designing optimal climate interventions that can be applied broadly for geoengineering scenarios under consideration.

Related

  1. Hydraulic analysis and electrical resistivity for optimizing coastal groundwater management for irrigation under climate stress
    Collins O. Molua, Anthony O. Ukpene, John C. Morka +1
    Discover GeosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeophysics & seismologyDOAJ
  2. Mapping justice claims for solar geoengineering
    Sikina Jinnah, Portia Adade Williams, Catriona McKinnon
    PLOS ClimatePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceClimate sciencePLOS
  3. G6-1.5K-SAI and G6sulfur: changes in impacts and uncertainty depending on stratospheric aerosol injection strategy in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project
    Walker Lee, Daniele Visioni, Benjamin Wagman +8
    Atmospheric chemistry and physicsPeer-reviewedCC BY8 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  4. DiffSWE2d: a differentiable Shallow Water Equations solver for end-to-end flood and tsunami modelling
    Zhonghou Xu
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyFluid dynamicsarXiv
  5. Suêtes: An end-to-end differentiable non-hydrostatic limited-area dynamical core
    Tim Whittaker, Seth Taylor, Elsa Cardoso-Bihlo +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyDynamical systemsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{dubey2026optimizing,
  title = {{Optimizing Geoengineering Interventions Using Differentiable Climate Models}},
  author = {Pulkit Dubey and Dorian S. Abbot and Ashesh Chattopadhyay},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12528},
  eprint = {2609.12528},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12528},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimizing Geoengineering Interventions Using Differentiable Climate Models
AU  - Pulkit Dubey
AU  - Dorian S. Abbot
AU  - Ashesh Chattopadhyay
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12528
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12528
AB  - The deployment of a geoengineering program to cool Earth's climate may be imminent. It is crucial that tools be developed to ensure that such a program would achieve its objectives while minimizing disruption. Here we exploit recently developed differentiable atmospheric models to demonstrate a novel geoengineering control strategy. In the differentiable primitive-equation atmospheric model JAX-GCM we impose a uniform +4\,K ocean warming and ask what pattern of sea-surface temperature cooling -- in five ocean-masked zonal bands of prescribed SST forcings whose amplitudes are free -- returns land near-surface air temperature closest to the model's own unwarmed climatology. This idealized set-up represents a cooling pattern that could be delivered physically either by marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection. Gradients through chaotic dynamics decorrelate from the true sensitivity beyond the Lyapunov horizon, so we optimize greedily over segments of 8 to 14 days, following receding-horizon control. The learned strategy removes 92.3 ± 0.4% of the realized land warming across a ten-member ensemble of two-year rollouts, and a three-year run sustains it. If we use the spatial pattern of land temperature as the optimization objective, the distributions of precipitation, evaporation, and specific humidity over land are restored as well, even though they are not included in the objective function. The learned strategy from JAX-GCM replayed in the AI emulators LUCIE and NeuralGCM without re-optimization is successful, suggesting robustness. These promising results demonstrate a strategy for designing optimal climate interventions that can be applied broadly for geoengineering scenarios under consideration.
ER  -