Molecular Insights into Oil–Water Interfacial Behavior of Gemini Sulfonate Surfactants: The Critical Role of Spacer Group
- 1State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, College of Chemical Engineering and Environment, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102200, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology, Beijing 102206, China
- 3School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Abstract
Gemini surfactants are extensively employed in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) owing to their low critical micelle concentration (CMC), excellent interfacial activity, and strong self–assembly capability. However, molecular–level understanding of how spacer chemistry regulates the interfacial behavior of sulfonate–containing gemini surfactants remains limited. All–atom molecular dynamics simulations were employed to investigate four gemini sulfonate surfactants with distinct spacers (carbon–chain spacer (CA), ester containing spacer (EG), benzene–ring spacer (BR), and nitrogen–containing (NA)) at the n–decane/water interface. Based on its superior interfacial performance, the EG system was further selected to evaluate the effects of polyacrylamide (PAM) and partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM). Increasing surfactant concentration markedly altered interfacial assembly, and at 2.33 μmol/m2, pronounced interfacial curvature indicated a tendency toward microemulsion-like structures. Spacer chemistry strongly regulated interfacial thickness, hydration, and molecular organization. The rigid aromatic spacer of BR broadened the interfacial region through its strong oil–phase affinity, whereas the ester–containing EG spacer enhanced hydration and hydrogen–bond formation and promoted favorable molecular packing, resulting in the best overall interfacial performance. Further simulations showed that PAM accumulated near the EG interfacial layer and strongly interacted with EG, leading to a pronounced reduction in interfacial tension. In contrast, hydrolysis strengthened HPAM–water interactions and promoted its distribution in the bulk aqueous phase, thereby limiting its influence on the interface. This study provides molecular insights into how different spacer groups regulate interfacial behavior, offering theoretical guidance for the design and formulation of gemini surfactant systems for EOR.
Related
- Interfacial Molecular Behavior and Organization of Low-Fluorine Surfactants at the sc-CO2/Water Interface
- Molecular Simulations Investigation of Deep Eutectic Solvent Induced Structural and Interfacial Behavior in Surfactant-Enhanced Oil Recovery Systems
- Superchaotropic or Hydrophobic Behavior? How Borate Clusters Assemble with Nonionic Surfactants
- Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Molecular Dynamics Studies of Novel 1,2,4-Triazole-Functionalized Benzene-Sulfonate Derivatives as Potential Enzyme Inhibitors and Cytotoxicity in HepG2 Cells.
- Adsorption Behavior of C10 Amino Acid Surfactants at the Air/Water Interface: Implications for Membrane Compatibility.
BibTeX
@article{ren2026molecular,
title = {{Molecular Insights into Oil–Water Interfacial Behavior of Gemini Sulfonate Surfactants: The Critical Role of Spacer Group}},
author = {Wen Ren and Hao Lu and Jinyuan Zhang and Xingchun Li and Linglan Zhang and Chunmao Chen and Qinghong Wang and Shuixiang Xie and Ling Lin},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/polym18212665},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2665},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Molecular Insights into Oil–Water Interfacial Behavior of Gemini Sulfonate Surfactants: The Critical Role of Spacer Group
AU - Wen Ren
AU - Hao Lu
AU - Jinyuan Zhang
AU - Xingchun Li
AU - Linglan Zhang
AU - Chunmao Chen
AU - Qinghong Wang
AU - Shuixiang Xie
AU - Ling Lin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18212665
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2665
AB - Gemini surfactants are extensively employed in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) owing to their low critical micelle concentration (CMC), excellent interfacial activity, and strong self–assembly capability. However, molecular–level understanding of how spacer chemistry regulates the interfacial behavior of sulfonate–containing gemini surfactants remains limited. All–atom molecular dynamics simulations were employed to investigate four gemini sulfonate surfactants with distinct spacers (carbon–chain spacer (CA), ester containing spacer (EG), benzene–ring spacer (BR), and nitrogen–containing (NA)) at the n–decane/water interface. Based on its superior interfacial performance, the EG system was further selected to evaluate the effects of polyacrylamide (PAM) and partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM). Increasing surfactant concentration markedly altered interfacial assembly, and at 2.33 μmol/m2, pronounced interfacial curvature indicated a tendency toward microemulsion-like structures. Spacer chemistry strongly regulated interfacial thickness, hydration, and molecular organization. The rigid aromatic spacer of BR broadened the interfacial region through its strong oil–phase affinity, whereas the ester–containing EG spacer enhanced hydration and hydrogen–bond formation and promoted favorable molecular packing, resulting in the best overall interfacial performance. Further simulations showed that PAM accumulated near the EG interfacial layer and strongly interacted with EG, leading to a pronounced reduction in interfacial tension. In contrast, hydrolysis strengthened HPAM–water interactions and promoted its distribution in the bulk aqueous phase, thereby limiting its influence on the interface. This study provides molecular insights into how different spacer groups regulate interfacial behavior, offering theoretical guidance for the design and formulation of gemini surfactant systems for EOR.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -