Extending the osmophobic effect to protein side chains with a physical transfer model across osmolyte classes
- 1Institute of Chemistry - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Abstract
Understanding the role of the protein backbone and side chains on cosolvent-induced stabilization is essential for a molecular picture of osmolyte action. The prevailing view holds that protecting osmolytes stabilize proteins mainly through unfavorable backbone interactions - the osmophobic effect - with side chains playing a minor or opposing role. By revisiting the decomposition of amino acid transfer free energies to properly account for mutual shielding between backbone and side chains, we derive a transfer model consistent with experimental denaturation m-values for both urea and protecting osmolytes - a feat neither existing model achieves alone. Backbone accessibility is mechanism-dependent: geometric for excluded cosolvents, complete for binders with specific cosolvent-backbone interactions. For strong protecting osmolytes - TMAO, sarcosine, sucrose, trehalose, and sorbitol - both backbone and side chains contribute favorably to stabilization, with side-chain contributions comparable or even greater than the backbone's. For urea, accounting for the preferential binding and directional nature of urea-backbone hydrogen bonding - which makes the backbone accessible regardless of side-chain shielding - recovers the known balanced backbone and side-chain contributions to denaturation. Weaker protectants such as proline, betaine, and glycerol show competing backbone and side-chain effects that partially cancel. These results extend the osmophobic effect to side chains and yield a three-tier classification of osmolyte action: cooperative stabilization, cooperative destabilization, and competing backbone/side-chain contributions. The model's greater sensitivity to side-chain composition offers avenues for experimental validation and for protein engineering.
Related
- Recent advances on structure and dynamics of G protein–coupled receptors using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer
- Phospholipids that Plug the Pores of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Control Its Triglyceride Transfer
- The physical foundation beneath protein generative modeling
- Sfh3 is a sterol-modulated PI/PI4P transfer protein that confers azole resistance in yeast by specifically mediating lanosterol/PI exchange
- Decoding the Physical Mechanisms of Protein-Small Molecule Association by Multiscale Kinetic Monte-Carlo Simulations
BibTeX
@misc{pereira2026extending,
title = {{Extending the osmophobic effect to protein side chains with a physical transfer model across osmolyte classes}},
author = {A. F. Pereira and J. O. Araujo and W. Tarraga and L. Martinez},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.64898/2026.06.17.732849},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.17.732849v2},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Extending the osmophobic effect to protein side chains with a physical transfer model across osmolyte classes
AU - A. F. Pereira
AU - J. O. Araujo
AU - W. Tarraga
AU - L. Martinez
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/17
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.06.17.732849
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.17.732849v2
AB - Understanding the role of the protein backbone and side chains on cosolvent-induced stabilization is essential for a molecular picture of osmolyte action. The prevailing view holds that protecting osmolytes stabilize proteins mainly through unfavorable backbone interactions - the osmophobic effect - with side chains playing a minor or opposing role. By revisiting the decomposition of amino acid transfer free energies to properly account for mutual shielding between backbone and side chains, we derive a transfer model consistent with experimental denaturation m-values for both urea and protecting osmolytes - a feat neither existing model achieves alone. Backbone accessibility is mechanism-dependent: geometric for excluded cosolvents, complete for binders with specific cosolvent-backbone interactions. For strong protecting osmolytes - TMAO, sarcosine, sucrose, trehalose, and sorbitol - both backbone and side chains contribute favorably to stabilization, with side-chain contributions comparable or even greater than the backbone's. For urea, accounting for the preferential binding and directional nature of urea-backbone hydrogen bonding - which makes the backbone accessible regardless of side-chain shielding - recovers the known balanced backbone and side-chain contributions to denaturation. Weaker protectants such as proline, betaine, and glycerol show competing backbone and side-chain effects that partially cancel. These results extend the osmophobic effect to side chains and yield a three-tier classification of osmolyte action: cooperative stabilization, cooperative destabilization, and competing backbone/side-chain contributions. The model's greater sensitivity to side-chain composition offers avenues for experimental validation and for protein engineering.
ER -