Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Framework for Real-Time Deviation Settlement in Local Energy Communities

Abstract

This paper proposes a cooperative game-theoretical framework for the financial settlement of real-time deviations in Community-Based Local Energy Markets (CB-LEMs). The real-time settlement process is modeled as a transferable-utility cooperative game, and the resulting Real-Time Local Energy Market (RTLEM) game is shown to be superadditive and balanced. We analyze two game-theoretical allocation mechanisms, the Shapley value and the nucleolus, and evaluate their efficiency, individual rationality, coalitional rationality, and temporal-aggregation properties. We subsequently compare these mechanisms with a settlement rule based on proportional imbalance responsibility. The three mechanisms are efficient and individually rational, but only the nucleolus is guaranteed to satisfy coalitional rationality for every RTLEM instance. The proposed framework is demonstrated using real-world data from a residential energy community in Amsterdam, showing the trade-offs among the three allocation mechanisms in terms of surplus distribution, coalitional stability, interpretability, and computational requirements.

Related

  1. Predicting continuous load-settlement trajectories of bored piles: A GA-optimized weighted ensemble framework with explainable AI
    Loi Van Giap, Tuong Lai Nguyen, Tuan Anh Pham
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersStatisticsPLOSEurope PMC
  2. Distinguishing persistence from deviation in composite policy indices: A diagnostic framework for AI readiness trajectory screening and stratification
    Abedallah Zaid Abualkishik, Adel Khelifi, Ibtesam Mohammed Alawadhi +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsStatisticsPLOSPMC
  3. A Decision-Theoretic Framework for Comparing Likelihood Ratio Methods for the Rare Type Match Problem
    Giulia Cereda, Fabio Corradi, Cecilia Viscardi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. A decision-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification in epidemiological modelling
    Nicholas Steyn, Cathal Mills, Vik Shirvaikar +3
    American Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPMC
  5. PAGR: Proof-Carrying Algebraic-Geometric Retrieval: A Quiver-, Provenance-, and Sheaf-Theoretic Framework for Grounded LLM Retrieval
    Xingting Wang, Min Wu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{gonzalezrueda2026cooperative,
  title = {{A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Framework for Real-Time Deviation Settlement in Local Energy Communities}},
  author = {Angel M. González-Rueda and Iago Núñez Lugilde and Jose L. Crespo-Vazquez and Tarek Alskaif},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.03030},
  eprint = {2611.03030},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03030},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Framework for Real-Time Deviation Settlement in Local Energy Communities
AU  - Angel M. González-Rueda
AU  - Iago Núñez Lugilde
AU  - Jose L. Crespo-Vazquez
AU  - Tarek Alskaif
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.03030
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03030
AB  - This paper proposes a cooperative game-theoretical framework for the financial settlement of real-time deviations in Community-Based Local Energy Markets (CB-LEMs). The real-time settlement process is modeled as a transferable-utility cooperative game, and the resulting Real-Time Local Energy Market (RTLEM) game is shown to be superadditive and balanced. We analyze two game-theoretical allocation mechanisms, the Shapley value and the nucleolus, and evaluate their efficiency, individual rationality, coalitional rationality, and temporal-aggregation properties. We subsequently compare these mechanisms with a settlement rule based on proportional imbalance responsibility. The three mechanisms are efficient and individually rational, but only the nucleolus is guaranteed to satisfy coalitional rationality for every RTLEM instance. The proposed framework is demonstrated using real-world data from a residential energy community in Amsterdam, showing the trade-offs among the three allocation mechanisms in terms of surplus distribution, coalitional stability, interpretability, and computational requirements.
ER  -