Motivationally objective versus subjective decision-making: Neural correlates, behavior, and self-report
- 1NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the neural and behavioral basis of motivationally objective versus subjective value-based decisions. Using a within-subject fMRI design, healthy participants performed a risky decision-making task that elicited different levels of subjectivity in decision-making in two task conditions. In the Best or objective condition, choices were rewarded only when they were objectively best on a given trial, incentivizing decisions based on externally specified per-trial point maximization. In the Choice or subjective condition, participants received the reward associated with the chosen option, irrespective of how it compared to the unchosen option, allowing greater freedom to exercise subjective preferences in decision policy. Behaviorally, participants relied more on objectively optimal policy in the Best than the Choice condition. There was also a greater consensus across participants in behaviorally displayed and self-reported policies in the Best condition as well as a greater commitment to a single policy by individual participants in this condition, further confirming more objective behavior in the Best condition, compared to Choice. Moreover, behavioral inferences showed a greater agreement with self-report in the Best condition. Our fMRI results showed that the decision-making in Choice, relative to the Best condition, was associated with greater BOLD response in mid-cingulum/posterior cingulate cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting their involvement in less externally constrained, or motivationally subjective, decision-making.
Related
- Subjective and objective approaches in the study of conscious perception
- Neural correlates of the subjective experience of free-will during value-based risky decisions: a pilot study
- Multi-objective-conditioned-return-blocks decision transformer: a novel approach for multi-objective de novo drug design
- Adversity severity shapes caregiving predictors and neural correlates of infant social behavior
- Spontaneous eye behavior is an objective marker of parkinsonian severity
BibTeX
@misc{modak2026motivationally,
title = {{Motivationally objective versus subjective decision-making: Neural correlates, behavior, and self-report}},
author = {P. Modak and J. W. Brown},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.22.746476},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.22.746476v2},
note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Motivationally objective versus subjective decision-making: Neural correlates, behavior, and self-report
AU - P. Modak
AU - J. W. Brown
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/22
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.22.746476
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.22.746476v2
AB - In this study, we investigated the neural and behavioral basis of motivationally objective versus subjective value-based decisions. Using a within-subject fMRI design, healthy participants performed a risky decision-making task that elicited different levels of subjectivity in decision-making in two task conditions. In the Best or objective condition, choices were rewarded only when they were objectively best on a given trial, incentivizing decisions based on externally specified per-trial point maximization. In the Choice or subjective condition, participants received the reward associated with the chosen option, irrespective of how it compared to the unchosen option, allowing greater freedom to exercise subjective preferences in decision policy. Behaviorally, participants relied more on objectively optimal policy in the Best than the Choice condition. There was also a greater consensus across participants in behaviorally displayed and self-reported policies in the Best condition as well as a greater commitment to a single policy by individual participants in this condition, further confirming more objective behavior in the Best condition, compared to Choice. Moreover, behavioral inferences showed a greater agreement with self-report in the Best condition. Our fMRI results showed that the decision-making in Choice, relative to the Best condition, was associated with greater BOLD response in mid-cingulum/posterior cingulate cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting their involvement in less externally constrained, or motivationally subjective, decision-making.
ER -