Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Quantum Query Advantage Requires Space

Abstract

Hao, Huang, and Liu (STOC'26) recently showed that optimal quantum query complexity may require large workspace even for short-output problems, and asked whether a quantum query advantage over classical computation can itself require space. We resolve this question by exhibiting an explicit total Boolean function with quantum query complexity Q=Θ̃(M), and randomized query complexity R=Θ(M21/20), whereas, for every fixed 0<η<1/100 and S≤ O(M1/100−η), its S-space quantum query complexity satisfies QS=ω(M21/20). Consequently, Q<R<QS, so the unrestricted quantum query advantage disappears under sufficiently small workspace. The separation is obtained through a one-bit filtered-parity construction and a space-sensitive quantum lower bound based on compressed-oracle capacity and a new parity-to-capacity inequality, which may be of independent interest.

Related

  1. Parallel Quantum Advantage with Limited Adaptivity Requires Structure
    Qipeng Liu, Saachi Mutreja
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. An exponential query advantage from access to Stinespring dilation unitaries in quantum channel learning
    Manaki Arihara, Satoshi Yoshida, Philip Taranto +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries
    Natsuto Isogai, Satoshi Yoshida, Mio Murao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Exponential quantum space advantage in random data streams
    Adam Bouland, Matthew Ding, Siddhartha Jain
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. A Noise Operator Approach to Quantum Query Complexity and Time-Space Tradeoff Lower Bounds
    Paul Beame, Blake Holman, Niels Kornerup
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{gao2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum Query Advantage Requires Space}},
  author = {Minbo Gao and Zhengfeng Ji and Ziyi Xie},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.29497},
  eprint = {2609.29497},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29497},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum Query Advantage Requires Space
AU  - Minbo Gao
AU  - Zhengfeng Ji
AU  - Ziyi Xie
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.29497
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29497
AB  - Hao, Huang, and Liu (STOC'26) recently showed that optimal quantum query complexity may require large workspace even for short-output problems, and asked whether a quantum query advantage over classical computation can itself require space. We resolve this question by exhibiting an explicit total Boolean function with quantum query complexity Q=Θ̃(M), and randomized query complexity R=Θ(M^21/20), whereas, for every fixed 0<η<1/100 and S≤ O(M^1/100−η), its S-space quantum query complexity satisfies Q_S=ω(M^21/20). Consequently, Q<R<Q_S, so the unrestricted quantum query advantage disappears under sufficiently small workspace. The separation is obtained through a one-bit filtered-parity construction and a space-sensitive quantum lower bound based on compressed-oracle capacity and a new parity-to-capacity inequality, which may be of independent interest.
ER  -