Which memory does brain stimulation improve? The priming problem
Abstract
Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of cortical sites connected with the hippocampus improves scores on episodic memory tests and is being tested for memory decline, including in Alzheimer's disease. These gains are read as gains in intentional retrieval. Objective: To examine whether standard memory outcomes can support this reading and how the contribution of repetition priming can be measured. Methods: Narrative review of hippocampal-network stimulation studies, cognitive and electrophysiological research on priming and processing fluency, stimulation studies of priming and parietal cortex, and clinical trials of TMS for memory decline. Results: Old/new recognition and cued recall present studied items or cues again at test. Repetition priming makes these items easier to process, and this fluency can raise a memory score with intentional retrieval unchanged. The fluency behind word-recognition decisions is largely conceptual, so it persists after a change of surface form. TMS can also alter priming directly, and stimulating the standard parietal target changes the subjective side of recollection. Meta-analytic evidence shows that the gains are specific to episodic memory and largest for recollection tests after stimulation before encoding, but the priming contribution to these gains has not been estimated. Conclusions: Process-level claims about stimulation-related memory gains require the priming contribution to be measured. Five measurement steps, centred on matched indirect tests and process-dissociation procedures, make it measurable in the same participants, including in clinical trials.
Related
- A pro-inflammatory effector-memory T cell program links peripheral EBV priming to CNS autoimmunity
- Transcranial Random Aperiodic Stimulation Improves Working Memory Precision
- Motivational incentives improve working memory performance by enhancing memory-based representations rather than altering response strategies
- Hippocampal stimulation timed to memory reactivation shapes human sleep oscillatory dynamics and consolidation
- Forniceal deep brain stimulation improves memory in Rett syndrome mice by promoting the maturation of newborn hippocampal neurons
BibTeX
@misc{velioglu2026which,
title = {{Which memory does brain stimulation improve? The priming problem}},
author = {Halil Aziz Velioglu and Murat Can Celik and Dogukan Aslan and Mehmet Akif Sakiroglu and Yusuf Çiçek and Ali Tarik Altunc},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/nmeqx_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/nmeqx_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Which memory does brain stimulation improve? The priming problem
AU - Halil Aziz Velioglu
AU - Murat Can Celik
AU - Dogukan Aslan
AU - Mehmet Akif Sakiroglu
AU - Yusuf Çiçek
AU - Ali Tarik Altunc
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/nmeqx_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/nmeqx_v2/
AB - Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of cortical sites connected with the hippocampus improves scores on episodic memory tests and is being tested for memory decline, including in Alzheimer's disease. These gains are read as gains in intentional retrieval. Objective: To examine whether standard memory outcomes can support this reading and how the contribution of repetition priming can be measured. Methods: Narrative review of hippocampal-network stimulation studies, cognitive and electrophysiological research on priming and processing fluency, stimulation studies of priming and parietal cortex, and clinical trials of TMS for memory decline. Results: Old/new recognition and cued recall present studied items or cues again at test. Repetition priming makes these items easier to process, and this fluency can raise a memory score with intentional retrieval unchanged. The fluency behind word-recognition decisions is largely conceptual, so it persists after a change of surface form. TMS can also alter priming directly, and stimulating the standard parietal target changes the subjective side of recollection. Meta-analytic evidence shows that the gains are specific to episodic memory and largest for recollection tests after stimulation before encoding, but the priming contribution to these gains has not been estimated. Conclusions: Process-level claims about stimulation-related memory gains require the priming contribution to be measured. Five measurement steps, centred on matched indirect tests and process-dissociation procedures, make it measurable in the same participants, including in clinical trials.
ER -