Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Motivational incentives improve working memory performance by enhancing memory-based representations rather than altering response strategies

  1. 1University of Oxford

Abstract

Motivational incentives are known to improve working memory (WM) when items differ in value, but whether they enhance performance when all items are equally valued, and if so, by what mechanism, remains unclear. Improvements could reflect enhanced memory-based representations or speed-accuracy trade-offs, whereby incentives promote slower, more cautious responding without improving memory itself. Here, we tested these alternatives across two experiments using an auditory WM task in which incentives varied across trials, but all items on a trial were equally incentivised. In Experiment 1,we allowed participants to resubmit their responses if desired. Reward-related improvements in WM performance were selectively observed when memory load was high, and only at serial positions associated with greater interference. These improvements were also dissociated from systematic response slowing and resubmission behaviour. This indicated that the benefits of incentives were unlikely to be attributable to response caution. Critically, in Experiment 2, motivational benefits persisted under strict response deadlines, where speed cannot be traded for accuracy. Computational modelling showed that reward selectively improved the precision of memory-based responses without reducing guessing. Together, these findings indicate that motivational incentives improve WM by enhancing the quality of memory-based representations, rather than by strategic slowing or altering response strategies.

Related

  1. Nanotechnology-Enabled Strategies for Enhancing Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance
    Yusheng Li, Saddam Hussain, Lichen Wang +7
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  2. Enhancing physiological performance and antioxidant defense in Mexican lime (Citrus aurantifolia) under water-deficit: synergistic effects of PGPB and KNO₃ application
    Soraya Moallaye Mazraei, Esmaeil Khaleghi, Naeimeh Enayatizamir
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  3. Human milk-derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri improved growth performance of weaned pigs by modulating systemic immune responses and enhancing intestinal health
    Hyunjin Kyoung, Sewon Ha, Kyeong Il Park +11
    Journal of Animal SciencePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textZoology & animal behaviourPMC
  4. Enhancing food digestion and nutrient absorption through pre-digestion: Tailored strategies for special populations
    Peng Wu, Shao-Xiu Pu, Mao-Shuai Jiang +4
    Food & Medicine HomologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text11 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Microbial consortia and bioinoculant strategies for enhancing crop salt tolerance and restoring fertility in salt-degraded soils
    Cengiz Kaya, Muhammad Ashraf, Sergey N. Shabala
    Plant and SoilPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text10 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{nair2026motivational,
  title = {{Motivational incentives improve working memory performance by enhancing memory-based representations rather than altering response strategies}},
  author = {V. Nair and O. Agnel and E. Mizrak and S. G. Manohar},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.02.755939},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.02.755939v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Motivational incentives improve working memory performance by enhancing memory-based representations rather than altering response strategies
AU  - V. Nair
AU  - O. Agnel
AU  - E. Mizrak
AU  - S. G. Manohar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.02.755939
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.02.755939v1
AB  - Motivational incentives are known to improve working memory (WM) when items differ in value, but whether they enhance performance when all items are equally valued, and if so, by what mechanism, remains unclear. Improvements could reflect enhanced memory-based representations or speed-accuracy trade-offs, whereby incentives promote slower, more cautious responding without improving memory itself. Here, we tested these alternatives across two experiments using an auditory WM task in which incentives varied across trials, but all items on a trial were equally incentivised. In Experiment 1,we allowed participants to resubmit their responses if desired. Reward-related improvements in WM performance were selectively observed when memory load was high, and only at serial positions associated with greater interference. These improvements were also dissociated from systematic response slowing and resubmission behaviour. This indicated that the benefits of incentives were unlikely to be attributable to response caution. Critically, in Experiment 2, motivational benefits persisted under strict response deadlines, where speed cannot be traded for accuracy. Computational modelling showed that reward selectively improved the precision of memory-based responses without reducing guessing. Together, these findings indicate that motivational incentives improve WM by enhancing the quality of memory-based representations, rather than by strategic slowing or altering response strategies.
ER  -