Navigating anticoagulation in heart transplantation with thrombin–antithrombin complex: when conventional monitoring fails
- 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Abstract
Background Heart transplant recipients often face the clinical dilemma of coexisting bleeding and thrombotic risks postoperatively. Conventional anticoagulation monitoring parameters (e.g., platelet count, fibrinogen, D‑dimer, and anti‑Xa activity) frequently exhibit limitations in evaluating complex postoperative patients, including delayed response, poor sensitivity, and lack of clear target ranges. This case report describes the use of thrombin–antithrombin complex (TAT) to guide anticoagulation management for complex thrombotic events after heart transplantation and explores its potential value as a supplementary monitoring tool. Case presentation A 50‑year‑old male heart transplant recipient developed multiple venous thrombi in the extremities and cerebral venous sinuses during the early postoperative period. Conventional monitoring parameters (platelets, fibrinogen, D‑dimer, and anti‑Xa activity) failed to effectively warn of thrombus progression or guide dose adjustments. Thrombosis continued to progress despite increasing anticoagulant intensity. Introduction of TAT monitoring revealed that its dynamic changes closely paralleled thrombotic events. Persistently elevated TAT levels (> 8 ng/mL) indicated inadequate anticoagulation. After adjusting anticoagulant intensity based on TAT levels to maintain them within a safe range (< 8 ng/mL), thrombosis was controlled. Later, when anti‑Xa activity decreased due to infection, stable TAT levels provided evidence to maintain the original anticoagulation regimen, avoiding overtreatment. Conclusions This case suggests that TAT may serve as a useful adjunctive monitoring tool for hypercoagulable states after heart transplantation. Its dynamic changes may more sensitively reflect thrombotic risk and assist in clinical decision‑making, particularly when conventional parameters are contradictory or lack clear targets, thereby facilitating more individualized and precise anticoagulation management.
Related
- Editorial: Silver linings: navigating the challenges and opportunities of organ transplantation in an Ageing population
- Anticoagulation Monitoring in Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Subsequent Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.
- Comparison of bivalirudin and conventional anticoagulation therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Navigating Heart Transplantation in a Highly Sensitized Patient with Takayasu Arteritis: The Role of Perioperative Desensitization
- Navigating Dynamic Risks: Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation under Escalating Risk
BibTeX
@article{liu2026navigating,
title = {{Navigating anticoagulation in heart transplantation with thrombin–antithrombin complex: when conventional monitoring fails}},
author = {Chaonan Liu and Liqin Ling and Xunbei Huang and Zhiyu Yu and Shuang Wang and Jing Zhou},
journal = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s13019-026-04500-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04500-3},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Navigating anticoagulation in heart transplantation with thrombin–antithrombin complex: when conventional monitoring fails
AU - Chaonan Liu
AU - Liqin Ling
AU - Xunbei Huang
AU - Zhiyu Yu
AU - Shuang Wang
AU - Jing Zhou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
DO - 10.1186/s13019-026-04500-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04500-3
AB - Background Heart transplant recipients often face the clinical dilemma of coexisting bleeding and thrombotic risks postoperatively. Conventional anticoagulation monitoring parameters (e.g., platelet count, fibrinogen, D‑dimer, and anti‑Xa activity) frequently exhibit limitations in evaluating complex postoperative patients, including delayed response, poor sensitivity, and lack of clear target ranges. This case report describes the use of thrombin–antithrombin complex (TAT) to guide anticoagulation management for complex thrombotic events after heart transplantation and explores its potential value as a supplementary monitoring tool. Case presentation A 50‑year‑old male heart transplant recipient developed multiple venous thrombi in the extremities and cerebral venous sinuses during the early postoperative period. Conventional monitoring parameters (platelets, fibrinogen, D‑dimer, and anti‑Xa activity) failed to effectively warn of thrombus progression or guide dose adjustments. Thrombosis continued to progress despite increasing anticoagulant intensity. Introduction of TAT monitoring revealed that its dynamic changes closely paralleled thrombotic events. Persistently elevated TAT levels (> 8 ng/mL) indicated inadequate anticoagulation. After adjusting anticoagulant intensity based on TAT levels to maintain them within a safe range (< 8 ng/mL), thrombosis was controlled. Later, when anti‑Xa activity decreased due to infection, stable TAT levels provided evidence to maintain the original anticoagulation regimen, avoiding overtreatment. Conclusions This case suggests that TAT may serve as a useful adjunctive monitoring tool for hypercoagulable states after heart transplantation. Its dynamic changes may more sensitively reflect thrombotic risk and assist in clinical decision‑making, particularly when conventional parameters are contradictory or lack clear targets, thereby facilitating more individualized and precise anticoagulation management.
SN - 1749-8090
ER -