Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Algorithmic Randomness and Physical Typicality

Abstract

Appeals to typicality are common in physics, but it is often unclear what it means for a physical state to be typical relative to a probability measure, and correspondingly unclear what a law that appeals to typicality asserts. Here we consider how one might characterize physical typicality using ideas from the theory of algorithmic randomness. As a concrete example, we show how taking a physical state to be typical relative to a computable measure when it is Martin-Löf random allows one to formulate the distribution postulate in Bohmian mechanics as a statistical constraining law of the theory. Using a toy model, we show how this constraint guarantees the standard Born statistics for computable experimental protocols. Algorithmic Bohmian mechanics (aBM) thus illustrates how algorithmic randomness may be used to provide precise content to a statistical law.

Related

  1. A Note on the Failure of L^2 Boundedness in Self-Similar Navier-Stokes Constructions: Algorithmic Hallucination vs. Physical Reality
    Aziz Arbai
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsFluid dynamicsHAL
  2. The weakness of typicality
    Eric P. Astor, Laurent Bienvenu, Damir D Dzhafarov +4
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsHALarXiv
  3. The Failure of Simultaneous Quantum Typicality
    Benoit Collins
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
  4. Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Demand and Yield Randomness
    Zhi Chen, Weijun Xie
    Production and Operations ManagementPeer-reviewedLicence not stated50 citedOptimisation & controlHAL
  5. How far is Kolmogorov-Loveland randomness from Martin-Löf randomness?
    Tomislav Petrović
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{barrett2026algorithmic,
  title = {{Algorithmic Randomness and Physical Typicality}},
  author = {Jeffrey A. Barrett and Eddy Keming Chen and Josiah Lopez-Wild},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.06268},
  eprint = {2609.06268},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06268},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Algorithmic Randomness and Physical Typicality
AU  - Jeffrey A. Barrett
AU  - Eddy Keming Chen
AU  - Josiah Lopez-Wild
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.06268
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06268
AB  - Appeals to typicality are common in physics, but it is often unclear what it means for a physical state to be typical relative to a probability measure, and correspondingly unclear what a law that appeals to typicality asserts. Here we consider how one might characterize physical typicality using ideas from the theory of algorithmic randomness. As a concrete example, we show how taking a physical state to be typical relative to a computable measure when it is Martin-Löf random allows one to formulate the distribution postulate in Bohmian mechanics as a statistical constraining law of the theory. Using a toy model, we show how this constraint guarantees the standard Born statistics for computable experimental protocols. Algorithmic Bohmian mechanics (aBM) thus illustrates how algorithmic randomness may be used to provide precise content to a statistical law.
ER  -