Environmental correlates of main and secondary sett locations in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a lowland landscape
- 1Department of Genetics, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
- 2Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, Department of Physical Geography, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- 3Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Protection, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Abstract
The main aim of this research was to investigate site selection for two types of Eurasian badger (Meles meles) setts (main and secondary) in relation to environmental factors (soil type and vegetation structure) and distances to meadows, rivers, human settlements, and public roads in the Stobrawa Landscape Park (SLP, southwestern Poland). A total of 53 badger setts were identified, comprising 31 main setts (58,5%) and 22 secondary setts (41,5%). The environmental variables that most clearly differentiated main and secondary setts were distance to water sources and soil type. Our results indicate that forest type influenced the locations of main setts but was not significantly associated with the locations of secondary setts. Regarding soil type, significant differences were observed between the soil types used for secondary setts and the overall distribution of these soil types in the SLP. We applied various analytical approaches to evaluate sett distribution relative to six habitat and landscape variables. Main setts were located farther from public roads and human settlements, but closer to meadows and water. In the case of secondary settlements, it was revealed that they were situated closer to meadows, where the other conditions (buildings, roads, and water) were not significant. In conclusion, main setts were situated closer to water, whereas secondary setts were farther from water and closer to meadows; the tendency for setts to occur farther from buildings and roads appeared to reflect terrain characteristics rather than species-specific habitat preferences.
Related
- Evaluating functional connectivity in urban aquatic ecosystems using environmental DNA: A case study on eurasian otter (
- Air Pollution, Early Adversity, and Amygdala: Environmental Correlates of Psychopathology in Preadolescents
- Biological and environmental correlates of cougar (Puma concolor) survival in west central Alberta
- Environmental correlates of understory plant diversity and distribution in a temperate climate-change refugium
- Kin count: Social, physiological, and environmental correlates of annual survival in Belding’s ground squirrels
BibTeX
@article{kochan2026environmental,
title = {{Environmental correlates of main and secondary sett locations in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a lowland landscape}},
author = {J. I. Kochan and A. Gerlée and M. Frąszczak and P. Kurek and W. Kruszyński},
journal = {The European Zoological Journal},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1080/24750263.2026.2748121},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2026.2748121},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Environmental correlates of main and secondary sett locations in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a lowland landscape
AU - J. I. Kochan
AU - A. Gerlée
AU - M. Frąszczak
AU - P. Kurek
AU - W. Kruszyński
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - The European Zoological Journal
DO - 10.1080/24750263.2026.2748121
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2026.2748121
AB - The main aim of this research was to investigate site selection for two types of Eurasian badger (Meles meles) setts (main and secondary) in relation to environmental factors (soil type and vegetation structure) and distances to meadows, rivers, human settlements, and public roads in the Stobrawa Landscape Park (SLP, southwestern Poland). A total of 53 badger setts were identified, comprising 31 main setts (58,5%) and 22 secondary setts (41,5%). The environmental variables that most clearly differentiated main and secondary setts were distance to water sources and soil type. Our results indicate that forest type influenced the locations of main setts but was not significantly associated with the locations of secondary setts. Regarding soil type, significant differences were observed between the soil types used for secondary setts and the overall distribution of these soil types in the SLP. We applied various analytical approaches to evaluate sett distribution relative to six habitat and landscape variables. Main setts were located farther from public roads and human settlements, but closer to meadows and water. In the case of secondary settlements, it was revealed that they were situated closer to meadows, where the other conditions (buildings, roads, and water) were not significant. In conclusion, main setts were situated closer to water, whereas secondary setts were farther from water and closer to meadows; the tendency for setts to occur farther from buildings and roads appeared to reflect terrain characteristics rather than species-specific habitat preferences.
SN - 2475-0263
ER -