Biological and environmental correlates of cougar (Puma concolor) survival in west central Alberta
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
- 2Fish and Wildlife Stewardship, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
- 3Office of the Chief Scientist, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
- 4Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
Managing large carnivores benefits from understanding their vital rates, including survival. For cougars (Puma concolor), the hazards relevant to survival across the landscape are poorly understood. The risks that landscape features present can change temporally, increasing survival in one season while creating mortality risk in another. Between 2016 and 2021, 80 cougars were radio-collared and tracked in west central Alberta, Canada, for a total of 1082 cougar months with a mean monitoring time of 13.5 months/individual. We documented 37 deaths, determined causes of mortality, generated survival estimates using Kaplan-Meier models by sex and age class annually and for two seasons (i.e., warm and cold), and investigated factors affecting survival using Cox proportional hazard models. Humans were responsible for 29 of the 37 documented mortalities, including harvest, removal of problem individuals, landowner removals, incidental trapping, and vehicle collisions, with harvest representing the largest single source of mortality (16/37 deaths) for both sexes. However, we were unable to detect a difference in survival estimates between sexes or age classes and found no evidence of a male-biased harvest. Mean annual survival was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50–0.72) and varied seasonally with lower survival in the cold season (0.62, 95% CI: 0.52–0.74) than the warm season (0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–1.00). Using Cox proportional hazards models (Andersen-Gill), model selection identified a best-supported mixed model combining biological, environmental, and anthropogenic features: season, proximity to residences, proximity to secondary roads, linear-feature crossing rate, and step length.
Related
- Kin count: Social, physiological, and environmental correlates of annual survival in Belding’s ground squirrels
- Temperature-Dependent Development, Survival, and Population Growth of Novius penicillioides: Implications for Biological Control of Icerya jacobsoni Under Climate Warming
- Air Pollution, Early Adversity, and Amygdala: Environmental Correlates of Psychopathology in Preadolescents
- Environmental correlates of main and secondary sett locations in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a lowland landscape
- Environmental correlates of understory plant diversity and distribution in a temperate climate-change refugium
BibTeX
@article{littlefair2026biological,
title = {{Biological and environmental correlates of cougar (Puma concolor) survival in west central Alberta}},
author = {Carter J Littlefair and Paul F Frame and Mark A Edwards and Andrew E Derocher},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0357879},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357879},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Biological and environmental correlates of cougar (Puma concolor) survival in west central Alberta
AU - Carter J Littlefair
AU - Paul F Frame
AU - Mark A Edwards
AU - Andrew E Derocher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0357879
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357879
AB - Managing large carnivores benefits from understanding their vital rates, including survival. For cougars (Puma concolor), the hazards relevant to survival across the landscape are poorly understood. The risks that landscape features present can change temporally, increasing survival in one season while creating mortality risk in another. Between 2016 and 2021, 80 cougars were radio-collared and tracked in west central Alberta, Canada, for a total of 1082 cougar months with a mean monitoring time of 13.5 months/individual. We documented 37 deaths, determined causes of mortality, generated survival estimates using Kaplan-Meier models by sex and age class annually and for two seasons (i.e., warm and cold), and investigated factors affecting survival using Cox proportional hazard models. Humans were responsible for 29 of the 37 documented mortalities, including harvest, removal of problem individuals, landowner removals, incidental trapping, and vehicle collisions, with harvest representing the largest single source of mortality (16/37 deaths) for both sexes. However, we were unable to detect a difference in survival estimates between sexes or age classes and found no evidence of a male-biased harvest. Mean annual survival was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50–0.72) and varied seasonally with lower survival in the cold season (0.62, 95% CI: 0.52–0.74) than the warm season (0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–1.00). Using Cox proportional hazards models (Andersen-Gill), model selection identified a best-supported mixed model combining biological, environmental, and anthropogenic features: season, proximity to residences, proximity to secondary roads, linear-feature crossing rate, and step length.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -