Fundamental Limit for One versus Two Point Sources Detection using Direct Imaging
Abstract
We consider the task of distinguishing between a single weak incoherent optical point source and two weak incoherent optical point sources located symmetrically about the first source. θ is the separation between the two point sources scaled to the Point Spread Function (PSF) width in the image plane. Using an ideal focal plane array of intensity detectors (ideal direct imaging), we quantify the performance using the Bhattacharyya distance and find the scaling of its leading order term in terms of θ in the sub-Rayleigh regime. A suite of previous analyses of this problem lacked a comprehensive analysis for when the amplitude spread function (ASF) of the imaging system has zeros and reported a scaling that we find to be incorrect. We complete this analysis by explicitly calculating the leading order term of the Bhattacharyya distance for ideal direct imaging with any ASF, for small θ and show the difference in scaling based on the presence or absence of zeros in the ASF. This is similar to the ASF dependent performance in the task of estimating the separation between the two point sources and the task of detecting a change to an object. We then apply our results to the specific example of a Gaussian and a Sinc ASF and show good agreement with numerical calculations. Our results allow the accurate comparison of other measurement schemes with ideal direct imaging, and to the quantum limit.
Related
- Beyond Direct Imaging: Quantum Measurement Design for Small-Target Detection in UAV Hyperspectral Sensing
- Complementary-Aperture Pulse Sequencing for Fundamental-Band Nonlinearity Parameter Imaging
- Second-order multipole response of two nearby incoherent sources in wave-optical imaging of a Schwarzschild black hole
- Nonlinear pluggable optics: Digital signal processing-free Intensity Modulated Direct Detection links using analog photonic Next Generation Reservoir Computing
- Direct imaging of the Ni eg hole orbitals in the bilayer nickelate La2SmNi2O7
BibTeX
@misc{darekar2026fundamental,
title = {{Fundamental Limit for One versus Two Point Sources Detection using Direct Imaging}},
author = {Parth Hemant Darekar and Amit Kumar Jha and Michael R. Grace and Aqil Sajjad and Saikat Guha},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.00968},
eprint = {2606.00968},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00968},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Fundamental Limit for One versus Two Point Sources Detection using Direct Imaging
AU - Parth Hemant Darekar
AU - Amit Kumar Jha
AU - Michael R. Grace
AU - Aqil Sajjad
AU - Saikat Guha
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.00968
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00968
AB - We consider the task of distinguishing between a single weak incoherent optical point source and two weak incoherent optical point sources located symmetrically about the first source. θ is the separation between the two point sources scaled to the Point Spread Function (PSF) width in the image plane. Using an ideal focal plane array of intensity detectors (ideal direct imaging), we quantify the performance using the Bhattacharyya distance and find the scaling of its leading order term in terms of θ in the sub-Rayleigh regime. A suite of previous analyses of this problem lacked a comprehensive analysis for when the amplitude spread function (ASF) of the imaging system has zeros and reported a scaling that we find to be incorrect. We complete this analysis by explicitly calculating the leading order term of the Bhattacharyya distance for ideal direct imaging with any ASF, for small θ and show the difference in scaling based on the presence or absence of zeros in the ASF. This is similar to the ASF dependent performance in the task of estimating the separation between the two point sources and the task of detecting a change to an object. We then apply our results to the specific example of a Gaussian and a Sinc ASF and show good agreement with numerical calculations. Our results allow the accurate comparison of other measurement schemes with ideal direct imaging, and to the quantum limit.
ER -