Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

An Uncertainty-Guided Digital Twin Framework for Online Adaptive Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study

3 more authors

Abstract

Objective: Head and neck (HN) proton therapy spans six to seven weeks of anatomical change, while offline replanning takes about a week. We present an uncertainty-guided digital twin (UGDT) framework that forecasts treatment-day anatomy before treatment and evaluate whether it generates online adaptive proton therapy (APT) plans of clinical quality. Approach: A library of 302 longitudinal deformations from 88 previously treated HN patients was transported onto each new patient's treatment planning CT (TPCT) using two-step multi-atlas deformable image registration (DIR) built on a pretrained CT foundation model, generating about 284 predicted CTs (pdCTs) with contours per patient. Dispersion of propagated clinical target volume (CTV) contours defined a patient-specific robust margin. In ten patients, the quality assurance CT (QACT) triggering a replan represented treatment-day anatomy, and the physician-approved replan was the baseline. The pdCT most similar to the QACT (pdCT-H) and one from the lowest quartile (pdCT-L) were planned to within about 5% of baseline plan quality, forward-calculated on the QACT, and reoptimized to generate online APT plans. Main results: pdCT plans scored within -0.7% (pdCT-H) and -1.0% (pdCT-L) of baseline. Forward calculation on QACT reduced high-dose CTV D98% to 88.3% and 85.5%. After online reoptimization, D98% recovered to 98.3 +/- 0.3% and 98.2 +/- 0.3%, versus 98.5 +/- 0.4% at baseline. Spinal cord and brainstem doses remained below tolerance, and plan quality scores were within -1.1% (p = 0.19) and -1.7% (p = 0.01) of baseline. Significance: UGDT generated online APT plans comparable in quality to physician-approved offline replans using anatomy forecast before treatment, enabling a transition from reactive offline replanning toward anticipatory online adaptation.

Related

  1. A digital-twin framework for forecasting treatment-day imaging with contour uncertainty in adaptive proton radiotherapy
    Yizhou Wu, Jie Ding, Justin Roper +6
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  2. Deep Learning-based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Dose Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification for Left- and Right-sided Breast Cancer: A Single-institution Feasibility Study
    Thanakorn Sukha, Chanon Puttanawarut, Nat Sirirutbunkajorn +3
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  3. Model-Uncertainty-Aware Digital Twins for Non-Markovian Quantum Repeater Memories
    Muhammad Waqas Haseeb
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Evolutionary dynamics of collective-risk social dilemma game with risk uncertainty and adaptive strategy
    Chuanzhi Zhou, Ju Han, Xiaojie Chen +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  5. Feasibility of reduced PTV margins in magnetic resonance image-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer: a personalised approach.
    Bethany Williams, Saleh Sandoughdaran, Joan Chick +7
    Clinical and translational radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{wu2026uncertaintyguided,
  title = {{An Uncertainty-Guided Digital Twin Framework for Online Adaptive Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study}},
  author = {Yizhou Wu and Ryan J. Sanford and Huiqiao Xie and Jie Ding and Shupeng Chen and Tung-Ho Wu and Ping-Hsiu Wu and Justin Roper and Jun Zhou and Minglei Kang and Bill Stokes and Sibo Tian and David S. Yu and Xiaofeng Yang and Chih-Wei Chang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.39010},
  eprint = {2609.39010},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39010},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - An Uncertainty-Guided Digital Twin Framework for Online Adaptive Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study
AU  - Yizhou Wu
AU  - Ryan J. Sanford
AU  - Huiqiao Xie
AU  - Jie Ding
AU  - Shupeng Chen
AU  - Tung-Ho Wu
AU  - Ping-Hsiu Wu
AU  - Justin Roper
AU  - Jun Zhou
AU  - Minglei Kang
AU  - Bill Stokes
AU  - Sibo Tian
AU  - David S. Yu
AU  - Xiaofeng Yang
AU  - Chih-Wei Chang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.39010
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39010
AB  - Objective: Head and neck (HN) proton therapy spans six to seven weeks of anatomical change, while offline replanning takes about a week. We present an uncertainty-guided digital twin (UGDT) framework that forecasts treatment-day anatomy before treatment and evaluate whether it generates online adaptive proton therapy (APT) plans of clinical quality. Approach: A library of 302 longitudinal deformations from 88 previously treated HN patients was transported onto each new patient's treatment planning CT (TPCT) using two-step multi-atlas deformable image registration (DIR) built on a pretrained CT foundation model, generating about 284 predicted CTs (pdCTs) with contours per patient. Dispersion of propagated clinical target volume (CTV) contours defined a patient-specific robust margin. In ten patients, the quality assurance CT (QACT) triggering a replan represented treatment-day anatomy, and the physician-approved replan was the baseline. The pdCT most similar to the QACT (pdCT-H) and one from the lowest quartile (pdCT-L) were planned to within about 5% of baseline plan quality, forward-calculated on the QACT, and reoptimized to generate online APT plans. Main results: pdCT plans scored within -0.7% (pdCT-H) and -1.0% (pdCT-L) of baseline. Forward calculation on QACT reduced high-dose CTV D98% to 88.3% and 85.5%. After online reoptimization, D98% recovered to 98.3 +/- 0.3% and 98.2 +/- 0.3%, versus 98.5 +/- 0.4% at baseline. Spinal cord and brainstem doses remained below tolerance, and plan quality scores were within -1.1% (p = 0.19) and -1.7% (p = 0.01) of baseline. Significance: UGDT generated online APT plans comparable in quality to physician-approved offline replans using anatomy forecast before treatment, enabling a transition from reactive offline replanning toward anticipatory online adaptation.
ER  -