Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJMIR formative research

Supplementing the Interference Preservation Hypothesis With Motivational Interviewing-Based Feedback in a Rural Military Veteran With Moral Injury: Formative Case Study.

5 affiliations
  1. 1School of Human Sciences, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 475 Clocktower Drive, Carbondale, IL, 62901, United States, 1 6184531865.
  2. 2James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.
  3. 3Division of Epidemiology, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
  4. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
  5. 5Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

Abstract

Background

Veterans experiencing moral injury (ie, having witnessed or done something during military service that conflicts with one's value system) may encounter challenges that affect engagement and learning in online contexts.Objective

This formative case study examined the feasibility of integrating motivational interviewing (MI)-based delayed feedback, a key tenet of the interference preservation hypothesis, into an online program focused on machine learning instruction for a veteran with self-reported probable moral injury.Methods

One veteran completed a moral injury assessment and 17 training modules with various checkpoint assessments, followed by a machine learning module incorporating a pretest, MI-based delayed feedback, and a posttest.Results

The participant completed all instructional and assessment components. Checkpoint scores ranged from 66.7% to 100%, with 7 of 10 checkpoints exhibiting a perfect score. Machine learning performance increased from 90% at pretest to 100% at posttest following MI-based delayed feedback.Conclusions

These findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating MI-based delayed feedback within an online data science instruction program and provide formative evidence supporting evaluation in larger samples.

Related

  1. In people with nociplastic dominant chronic pain is multi-disciplinary pain management plus motivational interviewing more effective than multi-disciplinary pain management alone for improving pain self-efficacy and pain interference: A randomised controlled trial protocol
    Jon Ford, Paul O'Halloran, Nicholas F. Taylor +2
    Contemporary clinical trials communicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. Motivational Interviewing for Pediatric Residents: A Case-Based Workshop on Adolescent Substance Use.
    Roshni Bhat, Natalie LaBossier, Adam Kronish +1
    MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resourcesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Effectiveness of a Sequential Simulation and Online Learning Intervention on Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses’ Motivational Interviewing Knowledge, Confidence, and Skill Performance for Medication Adherence: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial
    Wen-Ling Hsieh, I-Hsien Li, Tsui-Mei Hung +2
    Asian Nursing ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyDOAJ
  4. An LLM-based motivational interviewing training system for Japanese clinical education
    H Arashi, K Okumura, M Yasuda +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  5. Phase-sensitive integration of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: a scoping review.
    Mei-Hsin Ho, Chizimuzo Okoli, Chun-Liong Tung +1
    BMC psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{mcdaniel2026supplementing,
  title = {{Supplementing the Interference Preservation Hypothesis With Motivational Interviewing-Based Feedback in a Rural Military Veteran With Moral Injury: Formative Case Study.}},
  author = {Justin T McDaniel and Jolie N Haun and Jenna Jamieson and Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo and Dawn Roberts and Lenorris Hughes and Dustin D French},
  journal = {JMIR formative research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2196/101294},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953928},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Supplementing the Interference Preservation Hypothesis With Motivational Interviewing-Based Feedback in a Rural Military Veteran With Moral Injury: Formative Case Study.
AU  - Justin T McDaniel
AU  - Jolie N Haun
AU  - Jenna Jamieson
AU  - Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo
AU  - Dawn Roberts
AU  - Lenorris Hughes
AU  - Dustin D French
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - JMIR formative research
DO  - 10.2196/101294
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953928
AB  - Background  Veterans experiencing moral injury (ie, having witnessed or done something during military service that conflicts with one's value system) may encounter challenges that affect engagement and learning in online contexts.Objective  This formative case study examined the feasibility of integrating motivational interviewing (MI)-based delayed feedback, a key tenet of the interference preservation hypothesis, into an online program focused on machine learning instruction for a veteran with self-reported probable moral injury.Methods  One veteran completed a moral injury assessment and 17 training modules with various checkpoint assessments, followed by a machine learning module incorporating a pretest, MI-based delayed feedback, and a posttest.Results  The participant completed all instructional and assessment components. Checkpoint scores ranged from 66.7% to 100%, with 7 of 10 checkpoints exhibiting a perfect score. Machine learning performance increased from 90% at pretest to 100% at posttest following MI-based delayed feedback.Conclusions  These findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating MI-based delayed feedback within an online data science instruction program and provide formative evidence supporting evaluation in larger samples.
SN  - 2561-326X
ER  -