Analytical metric tools: A critical reflection on their role, evolution, and future towards a more responsible and fit-for-purpose assessment
- 1Analytical Chemistry Group (TESEA), I. U. CINQUIMA, Faculty of Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47011, Valladolid, Spain
- 2Department of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ebla Private University, 22743, Idlib, Syria
Abstract
The evaluation of analytical methods has expanded from traditional performance criteria toward more holistic approaches that incorporate environmental, practical, and societal dimensions. This shift has driven the fast development of analytical metric tools, which are now widely used to support method assessment, comparison, and decision-making. However, despite their increasing growth, several transversal aspects remain insufficiently explored. This perspective article provides a critical reflection on the role, evolution, and future of metric tools in analytical chemistry. We discuss and summarize the current proliferation of metrics and question whether the field requires further tools or rather a more harmonized and effective use of existing ones. Key dimensions are analyzed, including the emergence of multichromatic frameworks that integrate multiple evaluation criteria, the ongoing digitalization of metrics, the potential role of artificial intelligence, and the development of new concepts, principles, and terminology that came up. In addition, we highlight the need to move beyond purely environmental perspectives by incorporating responsibility, inclusivity, and broader sustainability considerations. Several gaps are identified, such as the predominant ex-post application of metrics, the limited consideration of full analytical workflows and energy consumption, and the lack of integration into innovation and commercialization processes. We emphasize the importance of education, training, and harmonization to ensure their proper use. This work calls for a transition toward more responsible, transparent, and fit-for-purpose evaluation practices in analytical chemistry in the context of metric tools.
Related
- Chlorate as an emerging contaminant in water and food matrices: Sources, occurrence, toxicity, analytical methods, and mitigation strategies: A critical review
- A predictive transferability index for crystal plasticity framework selection: Variational derivation, analytical bounds, and FFT-based plausibility assessment
- Extraction Strategies for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A Critical Comparative Framework Integrating Sensitivity, Sustainability, and Analytical Trade-offs
- Quaternary ammonium compounds as food and environmental contaminants: occurrence, biodegradation, toxicity, analytical challenges, and removal– A critical review
- Analytical Method Development and Validation for the Quantification of Related Substances in Pantoprazole Gastro-Resistant Tablets by RP-HPLC: A Critical Review
BibTeX
@article{fuenteballesteros2026analytical,
title = {{Analytical metric tools: A critical reflection on their role, evolution, and future towards a more responsible and fit-for-purpose assessment}},
author = {Adrián Fuente-Ballesteros and Reem Hasan Obaydo},
journal = {Green Analytical Chemistry},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1016/j.greeac.2026.100362},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.greeac.2026.100362},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Analytical metric tools: A critical reflection on their role, evolution, and future towards a more responsible and fit-for-purpose assessment
AU - Adrián Fuente-Ballesteros
AU - Reem Hasan Obaydo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/09
JO - Green Analytical Chemistry
DO - 10.1016/j.greeac.2026.100362
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.greeac.2026.100362
AB - The evaluation of analytical methods has expanded from traditional performance criteria toward more holistic approaches that incorporate environmental, practical, and societal dimensions. This shift has driven the fast development of analytical metric tools, which are now widely used to support method assessment, comparison, and decision-making. However, despite their increasing growth, several transversal aspects remain insufficiently explored. This perspective article provides a critical reflection on the role, evolution, and future of metric tools in analytical chemistry. We discuss and summarize the current proliferation of metrics and question whether the field requires further tools or rather a more harmonized and effective use of existing ones. Key dimensions are analyzed, including the emergence of multichromatic frameworks that integrate multiple evaluation criteria, the ongoing digitalization of metrics, the potential role of artificial intelligence, and the development of new concepts, principles, and terminology that came up. In addition, we highlight the need to move beyond purely environmental perspectives by incorporating responsibility, inclusivity, and broader sustainability considerations. Several gaps are identified, such as the predominant ex-post application of metrics, the limited consideration of full analytical workflows and energy consumption, and the lack of integration into innovation and commercialization processes. We emphasize the importance of education, training, and harmonization to ensure their proper use. This work calls for a transition toward more responsible, transparent, and fit-for-purpose evaluation practices in analytical chemistry in the context of metric tools.
SN - 2772-5774
ER -