Healthcare utilization in patients with spinal disorders referred for specialist evaluation in Norway: an observational register-based cohort study.
9 affiliations
- 1Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. [email protected].
- 2Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
- 3Department of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- 4Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
- 5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- 6Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
- 7Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark.
- 8Cluster for Health Services Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
- 9Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
Background
Healthcare utilization is high for people with spinal disorders. We aimed to investigate differences in recommended versus actual healthcare use among individuals with back & neck pain compared to individuals with isolated back or neck pain. Additionally, we aimed to examine variations in healthcare utilization patterns before and after a specialist evaluation based on the location of pain.Methods
We linked the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry with health registries, including patients with spinal disorders registered between January 1st, 2016, and December 31st, 2020 (9316 patients (63% with back pain, 27% with neck pain, 11% with back & neck pain) aged 18-70 years, mean (SD) age 44 (13) years, 57% females). We studied the percentages being recommended and actually visiting primary care physicians, physical therapists, and chiropractors in primary care and outpatient and inpatient consultations in specialist care after an outpatient specialist evaluation (index consultation), focusing on differences between groups based on the location of spinal pain.Results
In total, ~20%-80% followed healthcare recommendations. Patients with back & neck pain followed recommendations less often than patients with back pain (39% (95% CI 35.7, 41.8) vs 45% (95% CI 43.9, 46.4)) or neck pain (44% (95% CI 42.4, 46.3)). Participants with back & neck pain had a proportion of consultations with physical therapists at 29.7% (95% CI 25.1, 34.2) and 25.4% (95% CI 20.7, 30.1) in years 1 and 2 after index consultation, ~6 percentage points higher than the back pain group (1st: -5.8% (95% CI -10.6, -1.0), 2nd: -6.0% (95% CI -11.0, -0.9). They also had a 2 percentage point higher proportion of consultations with primary care physicians compared to the neck pain group (1st: -2.4% (95% CI -4.1, -0.8), 2nd: -1.5% (95% CI -2.7, -0.3)).Conclusions
Patients with mixed back & neck pain have lower adherence to recommended care and higher utilization of physical therapy and primary care physicians two years after specialist evaluation compared to patients with isolated spinal pain. These results suggest that the current approach to managing spinal pain should be reconsidered to better address the complex needs of this patient group.
Related
- Healthcare utilization and medical costs among adults with selected psychiatric disorders: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
- One‐Year Healthcare Utilization and Costs After Emergency Department Encounters for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: A Statewide Observational Study
- An Evaluation of ICU Follow-Up Clinic Attendance and Subsequent Healthcare Resource Utilization in Wales, United Kingdom: A Retrospective, Population-Level Data-Linkage Study
- Evaluation of a Contingency Management Intervention to Treat Substance Use Disorders in a Family Medicine Residency Program: A Retrospective Observational Review Study of Patient Outcomes and Experiences.
- Behavioral pathways to hospitalization: physical exercise, social participation, and healthcare utilization in China
BibTeX
@article{kjono2026healthcare,
title = {{Healthcare utilization in patients with spinal disorders referred for specialist evaluation in Norway: an observational register-based cohort study.}},
author = {Lise Grethe Kjønø and Kjersti Storheim and Kåre Rønn Richardsen and Bjørnar Berg and Marianne Bakke Johnsen and Stine Haugaard Clausen and Jan Hartvigsen and Margreth Grotle and Karin Magnusson},
journal = {BMC health services research},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12913-026-15256-w},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972327},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Healthcare utilization in patients with spinal disorders referred for specialist evaluation in Norway: an observational register-based cohort study.
AU - Lise Grethe Kjønø
AU - Kjersti Storheim
AU - Kåre Rønn Richardsen
AU - Bjørnar Berg
AU - Marianne Bakke Johnsen
AU - Stine Haugaard Clausen
AU - Jan Hartvigsen
AU - Margreth Grotle
AU - Karin Magnusson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/03
JO - BMC health services research
DO - 10.1186/s12913-026-15256-w
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972327
AB - Background Healthcare utilization is high for people with spinal disorders. We aimed to investigate differences in recommended versus actual healthcare use among individuals with back & neck pain compared to individuals with isolated back or neck pain. Additionally, we aimed to examine variations in healthcare utilization patterns before and after a specialist evaluation based on the location of pain.Methods We linked the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry with health registries, including patients with spinal disorders registered between January 1st, 2016, and December 31st, 2020 (9316 patients (63% with back pain, 27% with neck pain, 11% with back & neck pain) aged 18-70 years, mean (SD) age 44 (13) years, 57% females). We studied the percentages being recommended and actually visiting primary care physicians, physical therapists, and chiropractors in primary care and outpatient and inpatient consultations in specialist care after an outpatient specialist evaluation (index consultation), focusing on differences between groups based on the location of spinal pain.Results In total, ~20%-80% followed healthcare recommendations. Patients with back & neck pain followed recommendations less often than patients with back pain (39% (95% CI 35.7, 41.8) vs 45% (95% CI 43.9, 46.4)) or neck pain (44% (95% CI 42.4, 46.3)). Participants with back & neck pain had a proportion of consultations with physical therapists at 29.7% (95% CI 25.1, 34.2) and 25.4% (95% CI 20.7, 30.1) in years 1 and 2 after index consultation, ~6 percentage points higher than the back pain group (1st: -5.8% (95% CI -10.6, -1.0), 2nd: -6.0% (95% CI -11.0, -0.9). They also had a 2 percentage point higher proportion of consultations with primary care physicians compared to the neck pain group (1st: -2.4% (95% CI -4.1, -0.8), 2nd: -1.5% (95% CI -2.7, -0.3)).Conclusions Patients with mixed back & neck pain have lower adherence to recommended care and higher utilization of physical therapy and primary care physicians two years after specialist evaluation compared to patients with isolated spinal pain. These results suggest that the current approach to managing spinal pain should be reconsidered to better address the complex needs of this patient group.
SN - 1472-6963
ER -