Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Toward mechanistic endotyping in allergic rhinitis: a State–Place–Time framework for appraising nasal tissue evidence

  1. 1Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Binhai County People’s Hospital

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis (AR) heterogeneity is usually described by sensitization, symptom burden, or inflammatory profiles, but these descriptors do not establish which mechanism operates in a particular nasal mucosa. This critical narrative review proposes a State–Place–Time framework that evaluates cellular programs together with their anatomical setting and exposure-related response phase. The framework distinguishes descriptive tissue states from candidate mechanistic modules, measurable mechanistic endotypes, and clinically actionable endotypes. These are operational definitions for this review, rather than a validated classification. Five overlapping examples are examined: IgE–FcϵRI effector activity, late-phase type 2 amplification, barrier–repair dysfunction, separable sensory, vascular, and secretory outputs, and putative stromal maintenance. An author-derived conceptual matrix summarizes human evidence, spatial localization, timing/recurrence, matched perturbation, accessible measurement, and clinical utility; it does not provide an evidence score or patient assignment rule. Human intervention supports IgE-pathway dependence, but this does not establish a validated nasal tissue endotype for treatment selection. Late-phase cytokine responses and epithelial abnormalities are supported by human observations and functional systems, while their stability and predictive utility remain incompletely established. Stromal maintenance remains a hypothesis, with important limits from nasal polyposis sampling and inferred communication. The framework complements existing clinical and inflammatory classifications by identifying missing links and testable alternatives. Progress toward clinical use requires reproducibility within patients, analytical and external validation, and incremental value beyond routine assessment; treatment-selection claims additionally require evidence of differential treatment benefit.

Related

  1. Evidence-to-Recommendation Framework for 2026 ACE Clinical Guideline on allergic rhinitis — diagnosis and management
    Samuel Goh Li Earn, MSc, MPharm, Jing Xi Yang, BSc (Pharm)(Hon), Shu Jun Kan, BSc (Pharm) (Hon) +3
    Singapore Medical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textImmunologyDOAJ
  2. Improving allergic rhinitis symptoms through nutrition as an adjunct: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of dietary supplements
    Jun Jie Lim, Ying Xin Lee, Qi Yi Ambrose Wong +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossref
  3. Association of Score for Allergic Rhinitis with Serum Total IgE and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis
    Nada Megahed, Rehab Rabie, Laila Al-kady
    Zagazig University Medical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textImmunologyDOAJ
  4. Environmental Ligands of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Allergic Rhinitis: Immune and Neuroimmune Mechanisms
    Yalan Xiong, Jia Han, Zhaoxin Yang +5
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyCrossref
  5. Low-density neutrophil subsets in allergic rhinitis: heterogeneity and an emerging hypothesis for the non-type 2 endotype
    Pengyuan Yu, Feihu Wu, Yufeng Chen +5
    Frontiers in allergyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{meng2026toward,
  title = {{Toward mechanistic endotyping in allergic rhinitis: a State–Place–Time framework for appraising nasal tissue evidence}},
  author = {Ye Meng and Xiang Gao},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1972016},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1972016/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Toward mechanistic endotyping in allergic rhinitis: a State–Place–Time framework for appraising nasal tissue evidence
AU  - Ye Meng
AU  - Xiang Gao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1972016
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1972016/full
AB  - Allergic rhinitis (AR) heterogeneity is usually described by sensitization, symptom burden, or inflammatory profiles, but these descriptors do not establish which mechanism operates in a particular nasal mucosa. This critical narrative review proposes a State–Place–Time framework that evaluates cellular programs together with their anatomical setting and exposure-related response phase. The framework distinguishes descriptive tissue states from candidate mechanistic modules, measurable mechanistic endotypes, and clinically actionable endotypes. These are operational definitions for this review, rather than a validated classification. Five overlapping examples are examined: IgE–FcϵRI effector activity, late-phase type 2 amplification, barrier–repair dysfunction, separable sensory, vascular, and secretory outputs, and putative stromal maintenance. An author-derived conceptual matrix summarizes human evidence, spatial localization, timing/recurrence, matched perturbation, accessible measurement, and clinical utility; it does not provide an evidence score or patient assignment rule. Human intervention supports IgE-pathway dependence, but this does not establish a validated nasal tissue endotype for treatment selection. Late-phase cytokine responses and epithelial abnormalities are supported by human observations and functional systems, while their stability and predictive utility remain incompletely established. Stromal maintenance remains a hypothesis, with important limits from nasal polyposis sampling and inferred communication. The framework complements existing clinical and inflammatory classifications by identifying missing links and testable alternatives. Progress toward clinical use requires reproducibility within patients, analytical and external validation, and incremental value beyond routine assessment; treatment-selection claims additionally require evidence of differential treatment benefit.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -