Diagnostic approaches for tubal factor infertility: a systematic review of HSG, HyCoSy, HyFoSy, and laparoscopy.
4 affiliations
- 1Kazakh Medical University "KSPH", Almaty, Kazakhstan.
- 2Department of Science and Human Resources, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan.
- 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 1, Medical University of Astana, Astana, Kazakhstan.
- 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baku Branch of the First Moscow State Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Abstract
Introduction
Tubal pathology remains a major cause of female infertility, making accurate assessment of tubal patency and morphology important for clinical decision-making. Several diagnostic approaches are available, including hysterosalpingography (HSG), hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy), hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy), and laparoscopy with chromopertubation. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on their diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and role in contemporary diagnostic pathways.Methods
PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2015 and March 2026. Studies evaluating methods for tubal patency or morphological assessment in women undergoing infertility investigation were considered. A total of 21 studies were included. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, particularly differences in study populations, diagnostic thresholds, and reference standards, the findings were synthesized qualitatively.Results
HSG generally demonstrated high sensitivity but variable specificity, limiting its reliability for confirming tubal occlusion. HyCoSy showed potentially useful diagnostic performance as a non-invasive screening method, although estimates varied across studies. Several studies reported favorable specificity, predictive values, and agreement measures for HyFoSy, together with improved patient tolerability; however, findings were not uniform and were influenced by methodological heterogeneity and differences in reference standards. Laparoscopy with chromopertubation remained the reference standard for assessing tubal patency and identifying concomitant pelvic pathology, although its invasive nature limits its routine use.Discussion
Current evidence supports a stepwise approach to tubal assessment in which less invasive methods may be used initially, with confirmatory or invasive techniques reserved for selected cases. Such an approach may improve diagnostic confidence while reducing unnecessary procedural burden and risks. Further well-designed comparative studies using standardized reference standards and outcome definitions are needed to clarify the relative diagnostic value of available techniques.
Related
- Reversibility of Male Factor Infertility: Mechanisms and Evidence from the Literature
- Genetic variants involved in sperm motility and their association with sperm motility parameters and risk of male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- Microfluidic sperm separation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection yields similar blastocyst rates compared with density gradient, however, may be of benefit for male factor infertility: a randomized sibling oocyte study.
- Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy for salpingo-oophorectomy and adnexectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Editorial: Frontiers in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in diabetic sensorimotor neuropathy, volume II
BibTeX
@article{alenova2026diagnostic,
title = {{Diagnostic approaches for tubal factor infertility: a systematic review of HSG, HyCoSy, HyFoSy, and laparoscopy.}},
author = {Adalyat Alenova and Almagul Kauysheva and Anuar Korkan and Islam Magalov},
journal = {Frontiers in reproductive health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/frph.2026.1861471},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909007},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Diagnostic approaches for tubal factor infertility: a systematic review of HSG, HyCoSy, HyFoSy, and laparoscopy.
AU - Adalyat Alenova
AU - Almagul Kauysheva
AU - Anuar Korkan
AU - Islam Magalov
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Frontiers in reproductive health
DO - 10.3389/frph.2026.1861471
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909007
AB - Introduction Tubal pathology remains a major cause of female infertility, making accurate assessment of tubal patency and morphology important for clinical decision-making. Several diagnostic approaches are available, including hysterosalpingography (HSG), hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy), hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy), and laparoscopy with chromopertubation. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on their diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and role in contemporary diagnostic pathways.Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2015 and March 2026. Studies evaluating methods for tubal patency or morphological assessment in women undergoing infertility investigation were considered. A total of 21 studies were included. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, particularly differences in study populations, diagnostic thresholds, and reference standards, the findings were synthesized qualitatively.Results HSG generally demonstrated high sensitivity but variable specificity, limiting its reliability for confirming tubal occlusion. HyCoSy showed potentially useful diagnostic performance as a non-invasive screening method, although estimates varied across studies. Several studies reported favorable specificity, predictive values, and agreement measures for HyFoSy, together with improved patient tolerability; however, findings were not uniform and were influenced by methodological heterogeneity and differences in reference standards. Laparoscopy with chromopertubation remained the reference standard for assessing tubal patency and identifying concomitant pelvic pathology, although its invasive nature limits its routine use.Discussion Current evidence supports a stepwise approach to tubal assessment in which less invasive methods may be used initially, with confirmatory or invasive techniques reserved for selected cases. Such an approach may improve diagnostic confidence while reducing unnecessary procedural burden and risks. Further well-designed comparative studies using standardized reference standards and outcome definitions are needed to clarify the relative diagnostic value of available techniques.
SN - 2673-3153
ER -