Beyond referral: social prescribing as an access-producing system
- 1Center for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System
- 2Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
Abstract
Social prescribing is commonly represented as a referral from healthcare to non-clinical community resources, but referral does not ensure use. This perspective argues that social prescribing should be designed and evaluated as an access-producing system. Drawing primarily on food-access interventions as an analytic case, it distinguishes financial, geographic, and relational access as dimensions of practical access that can function as intermediate implementation mechanisms when strategies change them. They are not the antecedent barriers themselves or the downstream outcome of participation; they are the conditions linking a strategy to use. The added value of this framing is therefore not a new taxonomy of familiar barriers, but a more explicit causal question: what changed that made a prescribed resource affordable, reachable, legitimate, and sufficiently trustworthy to use? The three access pathways may interact as complements or bottlenecks, and participation may occur only after each necessary pathway reaches a context-dependent threshold. This parsimonious framing directs evaluation toward proximal evidence of access before distal health outcomes are attributed to social prescribing and offers propositions for prospective testing rather than a validated comprehensive theory.
Related
- Bayesian re-analysis suggests participation rather than referral underlies the benefits of social prescribing for chronic diseases
- The Knowledge‐Practice Gap in Prescribing: A Study of Perceptual and Experiential Predictors at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia—A Cross‐Sectional Study
- Clinical profiles, referral patterns and low vision aid prescribing across four rehabilitation centres in Ghana: protocol for a multicentre retrospective record review
- Factors influencing access to green health prescribing in primary care for older adults – a qualitative systematic review
- Social prescribing for anxiety and depression in older adults: mechanistic pathways, implementation requirements, and limitations of current evidence
BibTeX
@article{kim2026beyond,
title = {{Beyond referral: social prescribing as an access-producing system}},
author = {Bo Kim},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1967437},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1967437/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Beyond referral: social prescribing as an access-producing system
AU - Bo Kim
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1967437
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1967437/full
AB - Social prescribing is commonly represented as a referral from healthcare to non-clinical community resources, but referral does not ensure use. This perspective argues that social prescribing should be designed and evaluated as an access-producing system. Drawing primarily on food-access interventions as an analytic case, it distinguishes financial, geographic, and relational access as dimensions of practical access that can function as intermediate implementation mechanisms when strategies change them. They are not the antecedent barriers themselves or the downstream outcome of participation; they are the conditions linking a strategy to use. The added value of this framing is therefore not a new taxonomy of familiar barriers, but a more explicit causal question: what changed that made a prescribed resource affordable, reachable, legitimate, and sufficiently trustworthy to use? The three access pathways may interact as complements or bottlenecks, and participation may occur only after each necessary pathway reaches a context-dependent threshold. This parsimonious framing directs evaluation toward proximal evidence of access before distal health outcomes are attributed to social prescribing and offers propositions for prospective testing rather than a validated comprehensive theory.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -