Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Measuring audience experience across 20 showings of the same theatre performance using customer feedback kiosks and a questionnaire

7 affiliations
  1. 1MAGICS-Aalto, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  2. 2Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  3. 3The Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
  4. 4Aalto Scientific Computing, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  5. 5Greta Productions, Helsinki, Finland.
  6. 6Aalto Studios, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  7. 7Aalto Behavioral Laboratory (ABL), Aalto Neuroimaging, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Abstract

Audience experiences can vary both between performances and among spectators, but little is known about how different methods capture this variation across repeated showings of the same production. We therefore examined audience experience across twenty live performances of the same music theatre production. We combined two complementary methods: immediate audience ratings collected through customer feedback kiosks and more detailed post-performance questionnaires. The kiosks recorded 1,887 responses, corresponding to 67% of total attendance, and 458 audience members (16%) completed questionnaires. Overall, the reception was positive, but kiosk ratings varied significantly across performances, indicating that audience-level enjoyment ratings differed from one showing to another. Kiosk and questionnaire responses to the same enjoyment question did not differ significantly at the aggregate level, suggesting that brief kiosk feedback may provide a practical, low-burden measure of audience-level enjoyment. Cluster analysis of questionnaire data identified three descriptive response profiles that differed primarily in overall engagement and ratings of specific artistic elements. These profiles illustrate heterogeneity within the audience of a single production. Qualitative responses from participants whose quantitative ratings were closest to each cluster centroid provided illustrative accounts of the experiences associated with these profiles. These narratives added context to the quantitative findings by showing differences in emotional tone, interpretive emphasis, and personal connection to the performance. Supplementary interviews with the director, artistic director, and an external playwright illustrated both interest in and reservations about incorporating audience data into creative work. Their comments emphasised the potential of empirical findings to support artistic reflection, while also underscoring the importance of how and when feedback is communicated within production teams.

Related

  1. The complementary-competitive interplay of consumer information search and experience sharing: Implications for targeted advertising and firm performance
    Wu Dan, Zhao Jiang
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceMaterials & polymersPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  2. Measuring evidence against exchangeability and group invariance with E-values
    Nick W. Koning
    The Annals of StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text17 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Yet another approach to measuring distance in some hyperspaces
    Dariusz Bugajewski, Piotr Maćkowiak
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Proof Perplexity: A Probabilistic Approach to Measuring non-triviality in Machine Generated Proofs
    Madhuparna Das, Soumya Banerjee
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  5. Measuring Sudoku Difficulty: Formulation, Propagation and Uniqueness Certification
    Aled Williams
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@article{sams2026measuring,
  title = {{Measuring audience experience across 20 showings of the same theatre performance using customer feedback kiosks and a questionnaire}},
  author = {Mikko Sams and Einat Amir-Ahola and Enrico Glerean and Sirpa Kähkönen and Taru Mäkelä and Reetta Ristimäki and Antti Ruotoistenmäki and Veli-Matti Saarinen},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0344225},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344225},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Measuring audience experience across 20 showings of the same theatre performance using customer feedback kiosks and a questionnaire
AU  - Mikko Sams
AU  - Einat Amir-Ahola
AU  - Enrico Glerean
AU  - Sirpa Kähkönen
AU  - Taru Mäkelä
AU  - Reetta Ristimäki
AU  - Antti Ruotoistenmäki
AU  - Veli-Matti Saarinen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0344225
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344225
AB  - Audience experiences can vary both between performances and among spectators, but little is known about how different methods capture this variation across repeated showings of the same production. We therefore examined audience experience across twenty live performances of the same music theatre production. We combined two complementary methods: immediate audience ratings collected through customer feedback kiosks and more detailed post-performance questionnaires. The kiosks recorded 1,887 responses, corresponding to 67% of total attendance, and 458 audience members (16%) completed questionnaires. Overall, the reception was positive, but kiosk ratings varied significantly across performances, indicating that audience-level enjoyment ratings differed from one showing to another. Kiosk and questionnaire responses to the same enjoyment question did not differ significantly at the aggregate level, suggesting that brief kiosk feedback may provide a practical, low-burden measure of audience-level enjoyment. Cluster analysis of questionnaire data identified three descriptive response profiles that differed primarily in overall engagement and ratings of specific artistic elements. These profiles illustrate heterogeneity within the audience of a single production. Qualitative responses from participants whose quantitative ratings were closest to each cluster centroid provided illustrative accounts of the experiences associated with these profiles. These narratives added context to the quantitative findings by showing differences in emotional tone, interpretive emphasis, and personal connection to the performance. Supplementary interviews with the director, artistic director, and an external playwright illustrated both interest in and reservations about incorporating audience data into creative work. Their comments emphasised the potential of empirical findings to support artistic reflection, while also underscoring the importance of how and when feedback is communicated within production teams.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -