Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYMathematics

A Spreadsheet Environment for Force, Torque and Strength of Materials Modeling: Bridging Analytical Mathematics and Engineering Practice

Abstract

This paper presents and validates a unified spreadsheet-based framework for engineering mechanics education and preliminary design. Three modules are integrated within a single openly available workbook: multi-point resultant force and moment computation; axial normal stress with stress concentration effects for three geometric configurations (plate with hole, shoulder plate, stepped shaft); and beam deflection for simply supported and cantilever configurations under point loads. All governing equations are implemented as explicit closed-form expressions validated against analytical reference solutions for six independent cases; relative errors fall below 10−10 in all cases. Three worked exercises demonstrate the practical scope of the framework. A biomechanical multi-point force system yields joint moments of −6880, −33,421, and −58,241 N·mm at the wrist, elbow, and shoulder, respectively. A tensile shoulder plate with Kt≈1.85 produces σmax=232 MPa against σy=200 MPa, identifying a design failure; a parametric redesign with fillet radius r=10 mm reduces Kt to approximately 1.59 and σmax to approximately 198.7 MPa, restoring structural safety. A cantilever beam subjected to a 20,000 N tip load yields a maximum deflection of 13,133 μm. The framework constitutes a validated intermediate layer between manual analytical derivations and high-fidelity numerical simulations, applicable to preliminary design, parametric sensitivity studies, and engineering education at the linear elastic level.

Related

  1. Didactic Design Research on Two-Dimentional Shape Materials Based on Learning Obstacles in Grade VII Mathematics Learning
    Widaswara Agustin Hanisyah, Nuriana Rachmani Dewi, Ardhi Prabowo
    Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-InovatifPeer-reviewedCC BY-SAFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  2. What professional knowledge of mathematics do CLIS teachers need?
    Teresa Assude, Jeannette Tambone, Aliette Vérillon
    La nouvelle revue de l'adaptation et de la scolarisationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text7 citedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Domain-Specific Mathematics Performance of Grade 8 Students: Evidence from a K to 12 Achievement Test
    Raymart Gorosin, Laila Teressa Bersoto, Febraida Mendiola +3
    Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary JournalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  4. It is time for a New Deal for mathematics
    Nestor Guillen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. The crisis of AI-generated mathematics
    Max Weinreich
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{munich2026spreadsheet,
  title = {{A Spreadsheet Environment for Force, Torque and Strength of Materials Modeling: Bridging Analytical Mathematics and Engineering Practice}},
  author = {Elisa Munich and Jérémie Schutz and Christophe Sauvey and Yves Gillet},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.3390/math14122213},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05762356v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A Spreadsheet Environment for Force, Torque and Strength of Materials Modeling: Bridging Analytical Mathematics and Engineering Practice
AU  - Elisa Munich
AU  - Jérémie Schutz
AU  - Christophe Sauvey
AU  - Yves Gillet
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/19
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14122213
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05762356v1
AB  - This paper presents and validates a unified spreadsheet-based framework for engineering mechanics education and preliminary design. Three modules are integrated within a single openly available workbook: multi-point resultant force and moment computation; axial normal stress with stress concentration effects for three geometric configurations (plate with hole, shoulder plate, stepped shaft); and beam deflection for simply supported and cantilever configurations under point loads. All governing equations are implemented as explicit closed-form expressions validated against analytical reference solutions for six independent cases; relative errors fall below 10−10 in all cases. Three worked exercises demonstrate the practical scope of the framework. A biomechanical multi-point force system yields joint moments of −6880, −33,421, and −58,241 N·mm at the wrist, elbow, and shoulder, respectively. A tensile shoulder plate with Kt≈1.85 produces σmax=232 MPa against σy=200 MPa, identifying a design failure; a parametric redesign with fillet radius r=10 mm reduces Kt to approximately 1.59 and σmax to approximately 198.7 MPa, restoring structural safety. A cantilever beam subjected to a 20,000 N tip load yields a maximum deflection of 13,133 μm. The framework constitutes a validated intermediate layer between manual analytical derivations and high-fidelity numerical simulations, applicable to preliminary design, parametric sensitivity studies, and engineering education at the linear elastic level.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -