Comparison of treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes between self-transported and EMS-transported patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI
- 1School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences
- 2School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of reperfusion therapy in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) depends largely on timely treatment. This study aimed to compare treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes between self-transported and EMS-transported patients with STEMI. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study included 208 patients with AMI who underwent PCI between March 2022 and June 2023. Of these, 92 patients arrived at the hospital by self-transport and 116 were transported by EMS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study population was predominantly male (78.4%), with a mean age of 58.05 ± 12.06 years. Significant differences were observed between self-transported and EMS-transported patients in onset-to-door time (P < 0.001) and door-to-balloon time (P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in AMI-related complications, including stroke, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, pericarditis, and dysrhythmias. Likewise, in-hospital outcomes, including left ventricular ejection fraction, length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and mortality, did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion Although EMS transport was associated with acceptably shorter treatment delays in patients with STEMI, total treatment times remained longer than recommended guideline targets. Our findings suggest that improving EMS utilization alone may be insufficient to improve clinical outcomes when overall system delays remain prolonged. However, given the limited sample size and low event rates, the results should be interpreted with caution. Patient-related factors may also influence treatment outcomes. Future large-scale studies are warranted to identify modifiable factors associated with treatment delays throughout the STEMI care pathway and to determine whether addressing these factors improves clinical outcomes.
Related
- Association Between Admission Calculated Serum Osmolality and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Triglyceride-glucose index and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
- Estimated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and incident myocardial infarction in patients undergoing dialysis: a nationwide cohort study.
- Roxadustat Treatment After PCI Among Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction : A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Comparative effectiveness of Orsiro, Xience, Synergy, and Resolute stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide registry study
BibTeX
@article{akhoundzadeh2026comparison,
title = {{Comparison of treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes between self-transported and EMS-transported patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI}},
author = {Kobra Akhoundzadeh and Saeideh Masoudi},
journal = {BMC Emergency Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12873-026-01717-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01717-2},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes between self-transported and EMS-transported patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI
AU - Kobra Akhoundzadeh
AU - Saeideh Masoudi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/01
JO - BMC Emergency Medicine
DO - 10.1186/s12873-026-01717-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01717-2
AB - Background The effectiveness of reperfusion therapy in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) depends largely on timely treatment. This study aimed to compare treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes between self-transported and EMS-transported patients with STEMI. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study included 208 patients with AMI who underwent PCI between March 2022 and June 2023. Of these, 92 patients arrived at the hospital by self-transport and 116 were transported by EMS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study population was predominantly male (78.4%), with a mean age of 58.05 ± 12.06 years. Significant differences were observed between self-transported and EMS-transported patients in onset-to-door time (P < 0.001) and door-to-balloon time (P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in AMI-related complications, including stroke, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, pericarditis, and dysrhythmias. Likewise, in-hospital outcomes, including left ventricular ejection fraction, length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and mortality, did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion Although EMS transport was associated with acceptably shorter treatment delays in patients with STEMI, total treatment times remained longer than recommended guideline targets. Our findings suggest that improving EMS utilization alone may be insufficient to improve clinical outcomes when overall system delays remain prolonged. However, given the limited sample size and low event rates, the results should be interpreted with caution. Patient-related factors may also influence treatment outcomes. Future large-scale studies are warranted to identify modifiable factors associated with treatment delays throughout the STEMI care pathway and to determine whether addressing these factors improves clinical outcomes.
SN - 1471-227X
ER -