Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCMedicine

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for predicting delayed neurologic sequelae caused by carbon monoxide poisoning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  1. 1Emergency Department, Hengshui People's Hospital, Hengshui City, China.
  2. 2Geriatric Internal Medicine, Hengshui People's Hospital, Hengshui City, China.

Abstract

Background

This study summarized and analyzed the prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for delayed neurologic sequelae (DNS) caused by carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database were searched to identify relevant articles from their inception to February 2026. The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI), area under the curve, meta-regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias for NLR were estimated to predict DNS.Results

Eight studies were included, involving 1757 patients with acute CO poisoning, among whom 382 cases (21.7%) developed DNS. The pooled results show that NLR was related to DNS (odds ratio = 14.67, 95% CI: 8.26-26.04, P < .001) and had high heterogeneity (I2 = 65.1%, P = .005). The area under the curve of NLR for predicting DNS was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 72%. Subgroup analysis indicated that study design may be the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of the results. Deek's test did not detect significant publication bias (P = .24).Conclusion

Current evidence indicates that an elevated NLR is associated with an increased risk of DNS after acute CO poisoning, supporting its potential utility as a prognostic marker. However, because the included studies showed substantial heterogeneity and were predominantly retrospective, these findings should be interpreted with caution and require validation in high-quality prospective studies. NLR should therefore be considered an auxiliary tool for risk stratification rather than an independent diagnostic method. Its principal clinical value may lie in resource-limited settings where advanced monitoring is not feasible.

Related

  1. Neurologic Stability During Tafamidis Treatment in Transthyretin Amyloidosis with a Mixed Phenotype: A Multicenter Real-World Study.
    Nowell M Fine, Nicholas S Streicher, Isabel Conceição +6
    Cardiology and therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Genomic in vitro transcription and Nanopore direct RNA sequencing of a human B-Lymphocyte cell line
    Talia Tzadikario, Stuart Akeson, Sally Dorer +6
    GigaSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text8 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefOpenAlex
  3. The Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETosis) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Molecular Mechanisms, Pathogenic Roles, Diagnostic Biomarkers, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  4. Stromal-derived Anxa1 engages neutrophil Fpr2 to brake the Nlrp3 inflammasome in otitis media with effusion
    Yixuan Liu, Zexuan Wen, Xiaoling Lu +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  5. Prognostic value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Minchao Qin, Zhongwen Feng, Chao Zhang +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryCell biologyPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{liu2026neutrophil,
  title = {{Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for predicting delayed neurologic sequelae caused by carbon monoxide poisoning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.}},
  author = {Xiao Ting Liu and Yong Yan Han and Xiao Lu Mi and Qing Mian Xiao and Wei Zhan Wang and Wen Pin Xu},
  journal = {Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1097/md.0000000000050975},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42888538},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for predicting delayed neurologic sequelae caused by carbon monoxide poisoning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU  - Xiao Ting Liu
AU  - Yong Yan Han
AU  - Xiao Lu Mi
AU  - Qing Mian Xiao
AU  - Wei Zhan Wang
AU  - Wen Pin Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Medicine
DO  - 10.1097/md.0000000000050975
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42888538
AB  - Background  This study summarized and analyzed the prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for delayed neurologic sequelae (DNS) caused by carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.Methods  PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database were searched to identify relevant articles from their inception to February 2026. The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI), area under the curve, meta-regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias for NLR were estimated to predict DNS.Results  Eight studies were included, involving 1757 patients with acute CO poisoning, among whom 382 cases (21.7%) developed DNS. The pooled results show that NLR was related to DNS (odds ratio = 14.67, 95% CI: 8.26-26.04, P < .001) and had high heterogeneity (I2 = 65.1%, P = .005). The area under the curve of NLR for predicting DNS was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 72%. Subgroup analysis indicated that study design may be the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of the results. Deek's test did not detect significant publication bias (P = .24).Conclusion  Current evidence indicates that an elevated NLR is associated with an increased risk of DNS after acute CO poisoning, supporting its potential utility as a prognostic marker. However, because the included studies showed substantial heterogeneity and were predominantly retrospective, these findings should be interpreted with caution and require validation in high-quality prospective studies. NLR should therefore be considered an auxiliary tool for risk stratification rather than an independent diagnostic method. Its principal clinical value may lie in resource-limited settings where advanced monitoring is not feasible.
SN  - 0304-5412
SN  - 1536-5964
ER  -