Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Prognostic value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

  1. 1Department of Urology, Jincheng People's Hospital, Jincheng, Shanxi Province, China.
  2. 2Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Hospital Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
  3. 3Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation is associated with the prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) combines systemic inflammation and host immune status. However, its prognostic value in non-metastatic ccRCC remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between preoperative CLR and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic ccRCC. Methods: We retrospectively included 414 patients with non-metastatic ccRCC who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy. The primary Cox analyses treated ln(CLR) as a continuous variable and assessed overall survival (OS) and the cause-specific hazard of ccRCC-related death. Sensitivity analyses included expanded adjustment and time-varying effects. Cut-off-based analyses were exploratory. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLR with other inflammatory markers. Incremental discrimination and calibration were assessed using bootstrap internal validation. Results: After adjustment for age, Fuhrman grade, and T stage, ln(CLR) remained independently associated with OS (HR = 1.589, 95% CI 1.257–2.009; P < 0.001) and ccRCC-related death (HR = 1.612, 95% CI 1.266–2.052; P < 0.001). The associations persisted in sensitivity analyses addressing additional pathological factors and time-varying effects. The 3- and 5-year AUCs of CLR for OS were 0.810 and 0.776, respectively. No statistically significant AUC differences were detected between CLR and CRP, NLR, or CAR. Adding CLR increased the apparent C-index from 0.843 to 0.885. After bootstrap optimism correction, the C-indices were 0.832 and 0.873, respectively (ΔC-index = 0.041). Calibration was assessed at 3 and 5 years. Conclusions: Preoperative CLR was independently associated with OS and the cause-specific hazard of ccRCC-related death in this single-center cohort. Adding CLR improved discrimination after internal validation, but its superiority over other inflammatory markers and clinical utility remain unestablished. Independent multicenter validation is needed.

Related

  1. Urinary TAGMe methylation enables preoperative risk stratification and reveals enhancer‑mediated regulation in urothelial carcinoma
    Qing Chen, Ziwei Wang, Wei He +13
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. The Impact of the Antidiabetic Agent Sitagliptin on the Radiation Response of Breast Carcinoma Cells with Different Metastatic Capacities
    Marie Theres Eling, Anouk Bottema, Dragana Savic +4
    CellsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Identification of prognostic biomarkers for nasopharyngeal carcinoma through microRNA‑mRNA network analysis combined with screening of immune‑related genes
    Lihe He, Xuan Huang, Ping Huang
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationCell biologyPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  4. Genomic in vitro transcription and Nanopore direct RNA sequencing of a human B-Lymphocyte cell line
    Talia Tzadikario, Stuart Akeson, Sally Dorer +6
    GigaSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text8 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefOpenAlex
  5. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for predicting delayed neurologic sequelae caused by carbon monoxide poisoning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xiao Ting Liu, Yong Yan Han, Xiao Lu Mi +3
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{qin2026prognostic,
  title = {{Prognostic value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma}},
  author = {Minchao Qin and Zhongwen Feng and Chao Zhang and Wei Song and Kai Wang and Zhen Chen},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0362126},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362126},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognostic value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
AU  - Minchao Qin
AU  - Zhongwen Feng
AU  - Chao Zhang
AU  - Wei Song
AU  - Kai Wang
AU  - Zhen Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0362126
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362126
AB  - Background: Systemic inflammation is associated with the prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) combines systemic inflammation and host immune status. However, its prognostic value in non-metastatic ccRCC remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between preoperative CLR and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic ccRCC. Methods: We retrospectively included 414 patients with non-metastatic ccRCC who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy. The primary Cox analyses treated ln(CLR) as a continuous variable and assessed overall survival (OS) and the cause-specific hazard of ccRCC-related death. Sensitivity analyses included expanded adjustment and time-varying effects. Cut-off-based analyses were exploratory. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLR with other inflammatory markers. Incremental discrimination and calibration were assessed using bootstrap internal validation. Results: After adjustment for age, Fuhrman grade, and T stage, ln(CLR) remained independently associated with OS (HR = 1.589, 95% CI 1.257–2.009; P < 0.001) and ccRCC-related death (HR = 1.612, 95% CI 1.266–2.052; P < 0.001). The associations persisted in sensitivity analyses addressing additional pathological factors and time-varying effects. The 3- and 5-year AUCs of CLR for OS were 0.810 and 0.776, respectively. No statistically significant AUC differences were detected between CLR and CRP, NLR, or CAR. Adding CLR increased the apparent C-index from 0.843 to 0.885. After bootstrap optimism correction, the C-indices were 0.832 and 0.873, respectively (ΔC-index = 0.041). Calibration was assessed at 3 and 5 years. Conclusions: Preoperative CLR was independently associated with OS and the cause-specific hazard of ccRCC-related death in this single-center cohort. Adding CLR improved discrimination after internal validation, but its superiority over other inflammatory markers and clinical utility remain unestablished. Independent multicenter validation is needed.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -