Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical Proteomics

Integrated proteomics and machine learning for identifying candidate serum biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction-complicated cardiogenic shock: a prospective exploratory study

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041 People’s Republic of China
  2. 2Cardiac Structure and Function Research Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) prohibitively impacts survival. This prospective study aimed to discover and internally verify candidate serum protein biomarkers and evaluate their potential prognostic value for 30-day mortality in AMI-CS patients.

Methods: AMI-CS patients were consecutively enrolled into discovery (n = 30) and verification (n = 60) cohorts. Candidate biomarkers were screened using Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry, analyzed via differential abundance and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and verified via targeted Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM). Boruta feature selection for five machine learning algorithms were embedded within a rigorous nested cross-validation scheme. Incremental prognostic value over clinical predictors was evaluated using Cox regression and metrics including the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: DIA proteomics identified 216 proteins differentially abundant between 30-day survivors and non-survivors, and WGCNA defined an outcome-associated module linked to shock severity and enriched for oxidative stress and energy metabolism. During PRM verification, leakage-free nested cross-validation random forest model selected a seven-protein panel (YWHAZ, QDPR, MDH2, FAH, PSMA1, FABP5, and AHCY), which achieved a mean area under the ROC curve of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69–0.95) for 30-day mortality. Incorporating this panel significantly enhanced the IDI of the SCAI model (IDI 0.143, P = 0.016) and the IABP-SHOCK II model (0.138, P = 0.034), which remained independent after adjusting for core clinical confounders.

Conclusion: This exploratory study identifies a seven-protein candidate panel with potential value for early short-term risk stratification in AMI-CS patients. Large-scale multi-center external validation is strictly warranted to confirm its real-world clinical utility.

Graphical abstract:

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-026-09626-z.

Related

  1. Lattice rotation field around an indentation for identifying slip system interaction coefficients in FCC Nickel single crystal
    Alexandre Bourceret, Jalal Smiri, Yves Gaillard +4
    Materials Today CommunicationsPeer-reviewedHAL deposit licenceFull textMaterials & polymersHAL
  2. Identifying Plastic Inorganic Semiconductors Requires More Rigorous Criteria
    Qiao Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryCondensed matterarXiv
  3. A Reductionist Molecular Dynamics Framework for Identifying Molecular Descriptors of Hydration at Solid–Liquid Biomaterial Interfaces
    Tomoya Nakago, Kohei Shiraishi
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
  4. Identifying and Addressing Systematic Data Leakage in Protein-Ligand Affinity Benchmarks
    Björn Mattsson, W. Patrick Walters
    bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)PreprintCC BY7 citedMedicinal chemistry & drug discoveryOpenAlex
  5. Cation Vacancies with and without O-O Dimerization: Identifying Reconstructed Defect Configurations in Metal Oxides.
    Taifeng Liu, Xingfan Zhang, Jamal Abdul Nasir +11
    Journal of the American Chemical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026integrated,
  title = {{Integrated proteomics and machine learning for identifying candidate serum biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction-complicated cardiogenic shock: a prospective exploratory study}},
  author = {Xi Wang and Qian-feng Xiao and Fang-yang Huang and Si Wang and Ying Xu and Xiao-bo Pu and Yan Yang and Mao Chen and Xin Wei},
  journal = {Clinical Proteomics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12014-026-09626-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-026-09626-z},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Integrated proteomics and machine learning for identifying candidate serum biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction-complicated cardiogenic shock: a prospective exploratory study
AU  - Xi Wang
AU  - Qian-feng Xiao
AU  - Fang-yang Huang
AU  - Si Wang
AU  - Ying Xu
AU  - Xiao-bo Pu
AU  - Yan Yang
AU  - Mao Chen
AU  - Xin Wei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/20
JO  - Clinical Proteomics
DO  - 10.1186/s12014-026-09626-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-026-09626-z
AB  - Background: Cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) prohibitively impacts survival. This prospective study aimed to discover and internally verify candidate serum protein biomarkers and evaluate their potential prognostic value for 30-day mortality in AMI-CS patients.  Methods: AMI-CS patients were consecutively enrolled into discovery (n = 30) and verification (n = 60) cohorts. Candidate biomarkers were screened using Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry, analyzed via differential abundance and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and verified via targeted Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM). Boruta feature selection for five machine learning algorithms were embedded within a rigorous nested cross-validation scheme. Incremental prognostic value over clinical predictors was evaluated using Cox regression and metrics including the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).  Results: DIA proteomics identified 216 proteins differentially abundant between 30-day survivors and non-survivors, and WGCNA defined an outcome-associated module linked to shock severity and enriched for oxidative stress and energy metabolism. During PRM verification, leakage-free nested cross-validation random forest model selected a seven-protein panel (YWHAZ, QDPR, MDH2, FAH, PSMA1, FABP5, and AHCY), which achieved a mean area under the ROC curve of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69–0.95) for 30-day mortality. Incorporating this panel significantly enhanced the IDI of the SCAI model (IDI 0.143, P = 0.016) and the IABP-SHOCK II model (0.138, P = 0.034), which remained independent after adjusting for core clinical confounders.  Conclusion: This exploratory study identifies a seven-protein candidate panel with potential value for early short-term risk stratification in AMI-CS patients. Large-scale multi-center external validation is strictly warranted to confirm its real-world clinical utility.  Graphical abstract:  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-026-09626-z.
SN  - 1542-6416
SN  - 1559-0275
ER  -