Benchmarking Single-Photon Sources for Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution

@misc{memmen2026benchmarking,
  title = {{Benchmarking Single-Photon Sources for Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution}},
  author = {Janka Memmen and Yvonne Lasars and Tobias Heindel and Nathan Walk and Anna Pappa},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.42041},
  eprint = {2610.42041},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.42041},
}

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Benchmarking Single-Photon Sources for Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
AU  - Janka Memmen
AU  - Yvonne Lasars
AU  - Tobias Heindel
AU  - Nathan Walk
AU  - Anna Pappa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.42041
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.42041
AB  - Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution (MDI-QKD) enables secure communication without trusting the measurement devices, but its performance critically depends on the quality of the employed photon sources. We compare MDI-QKD implementations based on Weak Coherent Pulses (WCPs) with those employing Quantum Dot (QD) single-photon sources. WCP-based schemes are fundamentally limited by Poissonian photon-number statistics, imposing a trade-off between single- and multi-photon emissions, whereas QD sources exhibit sub-Poissonian statistics with low antibunching parameter g^(2)(0). Using a decoy-state analysis for both source types, we find that even at moderate mean photon numbers, QD-based implementations outperform the best-case WCP configuration - where the mean photon number is optimised at each transmission distance - across the full range of transmission distances. We further incorporate the effect of imperfect photon indistinguishability via Hong-Ou-Mandel interference visibilities into the security framework and demonstrate that both source types are highly sensitive to even small deviations from ideal indistinguishability, significantly affecting achievable key rates and maximum transmission distance.
ER  -