Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for QCT-Defined Osteoporosis: Incremental Diagnostic Value and an Exploratory 1.5-T Threshold in a Retrospective Study

  1. 1Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 439 Xuanhua Road, Yongchuan District, Chongqing 402160, China

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is frequently underrecognized in patients undergoing lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), creating an opportunity for imaging-based case finding. Methods: This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score against quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-defined osteoporosis, its incremental diagnostic value beyond age and sex, and the stability of a threshold derived under a standardized 1.5-T protocol. Among 281 consecutive adults, 278 formed the primary MRI cohort and 234 with valid L1–L2 QCT measurements formed the reference-standard cohort; 51 had osteoporosis. VBQ was calculated from L1–L4 T1-weighted vertebral signal intensities normalized to L3 cerebrospinal fluid intensity. Results: Interobserver reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,2)), 0.919; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.899–0.935). VBQ correlated inversely with QCT volumetric bone mineral density (r = −0.687; p < 0.001) and remained independently associated with osteoporosis after adjustment for age and sex (adjusted OR, 6.08; 95% CI, 2.36–15.68). Adding VBQ increased the apparent model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.847 to 0.896 (bootstrap optimism-corrected AUCs, 0.839 and 0.887). Standalone AUCs were 0.833 for VBQ and 0.863 for fat fraction. A VBQ threshold >3.7047 yielded 74.51% sensitivity and 83.06% specificity, but bootstrap-selected thresholds varied (2.5th–97.5th percentiles, 3.409–3.851). Conclusion: VBQ may provide an adjunctive opportunistic marker on routine lumbar MRI. However, its threshold is exploratory and requires external validation; VBQ should not be used alone to exclude osteoporosis.

Related

  1. Incremental Diagnostic Value of Cell-Block-Based Targeted BRAF and RAS Testing in TBSRTC Category III–IV Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Cumhur Selçuk Topal, Yaşar Kemal Duymaz, Büşra Sönmez +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Incremental Diagnostic Yield of Fetal MRI After Targeted Neurosonography in Fetuses with Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Serdar Aykut, İsmail Cüneyt Evrüke, Süleyman Cansun Demir +3
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  3. Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors on Residual Kidney Function in Patients Undergoing Incremental Hemodialysis: A Two-Center, Retrospective, Exploratory Cohort Study.
    José C De La Flor, Elena Jiménez Mayor, Avinash Chandu Nanwani +6
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Diagnostic utility of body fat distribution parameters in distinguishing osteosarcopenia from osteoporosis or sarcopenia alone in postmenopausal women: a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Jiacong Hong, Bailing Chen, Haonan Li +3
    Aging Clinical and Experimental ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedPhysiologyPMC
  5. AI-Driven opportunistic osteoporosis screening: the skeletal failure paradigm for trustworthy vertebral fracture triage
    Mohamed Ragab Nouh
    The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{yan2026mribased,
  title = {{MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for QCT-Defined Osteoporosis: Incremental Diagnostic Value and an Exploratory 1.5-T Threshold in a Retrospective Study}},
  author = {Zhongzheng Yan and Gaohai Shao and Meichao Deng and Xun Tang and Mengfan Yang and Yiming Qu and Hongjun Zhang},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218752},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8752},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for QCT-Defined Osteoporosis: Incremental Diagnostic Value and an Exploratory 1.5-T Threshold in a Retrospective Study
AU  - Zhongzheng Yan
AU  - Gaohai Shao
AU  - Meichao Deng
AU  - Xun Tang
AU  - Mengfan Yang
AU  - Yiming Qu
AU  - Hongjun Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/09
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218752
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8752
AB  - Background: Osteoporosis is frequently underrecognized in patients undergoing lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), creating an opportunity for imaging-based case finding. Methods: This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score against quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-defined osteoporosis, its incremental diagnostic value beyond age and sex, and the stability of a threshold derived under a standardized 1.5-T protocol. Among 281 consecutive adults, 278 formed the primary MRI cohort and 234 with valid L1–L2 QCT measurements formed the reference-standard cohort; 51 had osteoporosis. VBQ was calculated from L1–L4 T1-weighted vertebral signal intensities normalized to L3 cerebrospinal fluid intensity. Results: Interobserver reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,2)), 0.919; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.899–0.935). VBQ correlated inversely with QCT volumetric bone mineral density (r = −0.687; p < 0.001) and remained independently associated with osteoporosis after adjustment for age and sex (adjusted OR, 6.08; 95% CI, 2.36–15.68). Adding VBQ increased the apparent model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.847 to 0.896 (bootstrap optimism-corrected AUCs, 0.839 and 0.887). Standalone AUCs were 0.833 for VBQ and 0.863 for fat fraction. A VBQ threshold >3.7047 yielded 74.51% sensitivity and 83.06% specificity, but bootstrap-selected thresholds varied (2.5th–97.5th percentiles, 3.409–3.851). Conclusion: VBQ may provide an adjunctive opportunistic marker on routine lumbar MRI. However, its threshold is exploratory and requires external validation; VBQ should not be used alone to exclude osteoporosis.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -