Evaluating Diabetes Drug Targets for Vascular Dementia Prevention Using Drug Target Mendelian Randomisation
- 1University College London
Abstract
Vascular dementia (VaD) is a leading cause of cognitive decline with no disease-modifying therapies. It remains unclear whether diabetes drug targets causally influence VaD risk. We applied two-sample, drug target Mendelian randomisation (MR) to test whether modulation of eight antidiabetic drug targets may alter VaD risk. MR models used variants within genes encoding antidiabetic drug targets, selected according to their effects on circulating glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c, N = 437,749) in primary analyses, and cortex-specific cis-eQTLs (N = 2,683) in secondary analyses. Outcomes were clinically diagnosed VaD (N = 7,009 cases/899,672 controls) and neuroimaging markers of cerebrovascular disease: white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH; N = 50,970), inverse fractional anisotropy (iFA; N = 31,125), and mean diffusivity (MD; N = 31,147). Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; N= 62,892 cases/596,424 controls) served as a positive control outcome. Genetic instruments were available for seven of the relevant targets using both HbA1c and cortex cis-eQTL data. In primary HbA1c-scaled analyses, no antidiabetic drug target showed evidence of association with VaD risk or cerebrovascular neuroimaging markers, although DPP4 inhibition demonstrated a suggestive protective association for VaD (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46 - 1.02, p = 0.063), though the confidence interval (CI) included the null. Secondary cortex cis-eQTL analyses were similarly null, except for PPARG modulation, which was predicted to reduce iFA ({beta} = -0.50, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.02, p = 0.04). Overall, these findings provide little genetic evidence supporting currently licensed antidiabetic drugs as candidates for vascular dementia prevention, although DPP4 inhibition warrants further investigation in larger datasets.
Related
- Metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer share GPAT3 and PLAU as candidate genes: Mendelian randomisation, machine learning, single-cell knockout and docking
- Estimating dose-response relationships for vitamin D with coronary heart disease, stroke, and all-cause mortality: observational and Mendelian randomisation analyses
- Connecting diet and disease: Using Mendelian randomisation to bridge the gap
- DNA methylation age acceleration, depression and anxiety: evidence from a longitudinal adolescent cohort study (SCAMP) and Mendelian Randomisation
- A review of the relationship between dimensions of alcohol consumption and the burden of disease: 2026 update including Mendelian randomisation studies
BibTeX
@misc{packer2026evaluating,
title = {{Evaluating Diabetes Drug Targets for Vascular Dementia Prevention Using Drug Target Mendelian Randomisation}},
author = {A. Packer and L. Austin and D. M. Williams and V. Taylor-Bateman and E. L. Anderson},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.22.26363326},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.26363326v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Evaluating Diabetes Drug Targets for Vascular Dementia Prevention Using Drug Target Mendelian Randomisation
AU - A. Packer
AU - L. Austin
AU - D. M. Williams
AU - V. Taylor-Bateman
AU - E. L. Anderson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.22.26363326
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.26363326v1
AB - Vascular dementia (VaD) is a leading cause of cognitive decline with no disease-modifying therapies. It remains unclear whether diabetes drug targets causally influence VaD risk. We applied two-sample, drug target Mendelian randomisation (MR) to test whether modulation of eight antidiabetic drug targets may alter VaD risk. MR models used variants within genes encoding antidiabetic drug targets, selected according to their effects on circulating glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c, N = 437,749) in primary analyses, and cortex-specific cis-eQTLs (N = 2,683) in secondary analyses. Outcomes were clinically diagnosed VaD (N = 7,009 cases/899,672 controls) and neuroimaging markers of cerebrovascular disease: white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH; N = 50,970), inverse fractional anisotropy (iFA; N = 31,125), and mean diffusivity (MD; N = 31,147). Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; N= 62,892 cases/596,424 controls) served as a positive control outcome. Genetic instruments were available for seven of the relevant targets using both HbA1c and cortex cis-eQTL data. In primary HbA1c-scaled analyses, no antidiabetic drug target showed evidence of association with VaD risk or cerebrovascular neuroimaging markers, although DPP4 inhibition demonstrated a suggestive protective association for VaD (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46 - 1.02, p = 0.063), though the confidence interval (CI) included the null. Secondary cortex cis-eQTL analyses were similarly null, except for PPARG modulation, which was predicted to reduce iFA ({beta} = -0.50, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.02, p = 0.04). Overall, these findings provide little genetic evidence supporting currently licensed antidiabetic drugs as candidates for vascular dementia prevention, although DPP4 inhibition warrants further investigation in larger datasets.
ER -