Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintPublic domainmedRxiv

Exploring proteins as intermediates between physical activity and cancer in UK biobank

  1. 1University of Bristol

Abstract

Introduction Higher physical activity (PA) is associated with lower risk of several cancers, but the biological mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. We integrated observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches to investigate circulating proteins as potential intermediates linking PA to cancer risk. Methods We analysed accelerometer-derived PA measures (~100,000 participants), circulating protein levels (~53,000 participants) derived using the Olink Explore 3072 panel and cancer incidence (breast, colorectal, endometrial, and prostate cancers) via linked registry data among UK Biobank (UKB) participants. Observational associations were assessed using regression models and Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates, including body mass index (BMI). Proteins associated with both overall acceleration average and cancer incidence were taken forward in a two-sample and two-step MR analyses using genome-wide association data. Results Higher overall acceleration average was observationally associated with lower risk of breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancer, with attenuation after BMI adjustment for endometrial and colorectal cancer, and a positive association with prostate cancer. MR analyses supported a protective causal effect of higher overall PA on breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer risk, and suggested a much larger effect than observational analyses. Overall, PA was observationally associated with 436 circulating proteins of which 44 were also associated with incident cancer risk. MR analyses provided some support that TNFSRF13B was influenced by physical activity in the same direction as the observational analyses but found conflicting evidence for an effect of TNFSRF13B on breast cancer, although the MR analysis is consistent with a protective effect of physical activity on breast cancer risk. Conclusions While higher overall physical activity appears to causally reduce risk of several cancers, circulating proteins associated with PA largely do not show strong evidence of being intermediates of these effects, suggesting they may act primarily as biomarkers of physical activity rather than causal intermediates.

Related

  1. Large-scale accelerometry-derived physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessmentsin relation to health characteristics and outcomes among participants of the Lifelines Biobank study: rationale and design of the ActiveLIFE cohort study
    M. Netten, S. Schootemeijer, A. Sijtsma +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Physical activity and metabolic syndrome in relation to incident dementia in UK biobank.
    Yiqun Li, Xiao Ren, Minglan Jiang +8
    Nutrition & metabolismPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. MID-LIFE LEISURE-TIME PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOWER HIP FRACTURE RISK IN UK BIOBANK
    C. Rolls, B. G. Faber, E. M. Clark +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. HOW SAFE IS EXERCISE? ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN MID-LIFE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND FRACTURE IN UK BIOBANK: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    C. Rolls, J. Tobias, h. dawes +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedPhysiologymedRxiv
  5. Potential effect of replacing sedentary behavior with physical activity on the risk of atrial fibrillation: results from the UK Biobank and REGARDS study
    L. Li, A. J. Shah, Y.-A. Ko +8
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{goudswaard2026exploring,
  title = {{Exploring proteins as intermediates between physical activity and cancer in UK biobank}},
  author = {L. J. Goudswaard and M. A. Lee and L. M. Hobson and R. Richmond and E. E. Vincent and R. Martin and M. Gunter and B. M. Lynch and K. K. Tsilidis and S. J. Lewis},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.10.26362738},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.26362738v1},
  note = {Public domain},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Exploring proteins as intermediates between physical activity and cancer in UK biobank
AU  - L. J. Goudswaard
AU  - M. A. Lee
AU  - L. M. Hobson
AU  - R. Richmond
AU  - E. E. Vincent
AU  - R. Martin
AU  - M. Gunter
AU  - B. M. Lynch
AU  - K. K. Tsilidis
AU  - S. J. Lewis
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.10.26362738
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.26362738v1
AB  - Introduction Higher physical activity (PA) is associated with lower risk of several cancers, but the biological mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. We integrated observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches to investigate circulating proteins as potential intermediates linking PA to cancer risk. Methods We analysed accelerometer-derived PA measures (~100,000 participants), circulating protein levels (~53,000 participants) derived using the Olink Explore 3072 panel and cancer incidence (breast, colorectal, endometrial, and prostate cancers) via linked registry data among UK Biobank (UKB) participants. Observational associations were assessed using regression models and Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates, including body mass index (BMI). Proteins associated with both overall acceleration average and cancer incidence were taken forward in a two-sample and two-step MR analyses using genome-wide association data. Results Higher overall acceleration average was observationally associated with lower risk of breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancer, with attenuation after BMI adjustment for endometrial and colorectal cancer, and a positive association with prostate cancer. MR analyses supported a protective causal effect of higher overall PA on breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer risk, and suggested a much larger effect than observational analyses. Overall, PA was observationally associated with 436 circulating proteins of which 44 were also associated with incident cancer risk. MR analyses provided some support that TNFSRF13B was influenced by physical activity in the same direction as the observational analyses but found conflicting evidence for an effect of TNFSRF13B on breast cancer, although the MR analysis is consistent with a protective effect of physical activity on breast cancer risk. Conclusions While higher overall physical activity appears to causally reduce risk of several cancers, circulating proteins associated with PA largely do not show strong evidence of being intermediates of these effects, suggesting they may act primarily as biomarkers of physical activity rather than causal intermediates.
ER  -