Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

Comparative Analysis of Bilateral-Based Noise Reduction Algorithms in Low-Dose Pediatric Computed Tomographic Images.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Health Science, General Graduate School of Gachon University, 191, Hambangmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea.
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medical Services, Eulji University, 553, Sanseong-Daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13135, Republic of Korea.
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 St Antoine 10 Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
  4. 4Department of Radiological Science, Gachon University, 191, Hambangmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background: Noise reduction in low-dose pediatric computed tomography (CT) requires effective suppression of quantum noise without compromising subtle anatomical structures. This study compared three bilateral-based noise reduction algorithms, namely the conventional bilateral filter (BF), adaptive BF (ABF), and trainable BF (TBF), using eight low-dose pediatric abdominal CT cases. Methods: Denoising performance was evaluated in the axial and coronal planes through visual assessment and quantitative measurements of the coefficient of variation (CV) within the liver parenchyma and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the liver and portal vein. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Friedman test, followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-adjustment. All three methods reduced the visible noise present in the original images. Results: ABF improved uniformity in homogeneous liver regions while preserving anatomical detail, whereas TBF produced the strongest apparent noise suppression but introduced greater blurring and occasional ambiguous structures. Quantitatively, the CV decreased progressively from BF to ABF and TBF. The TBF method achieved the lowest average CV and the highest average CNR. Significant differences were observed among the four conditions for both metrics in each imaging plane. However, CNR differences between the three denoising methods were less consistent, particularly for comparisons involving TBF. Conclusions: Overall, ABF provided a favorable balance between noise reduction and structural preservation, whereas TBF offered stronger image specific denoising with additional concerns regarding signal fidelity and reproducibility. Further refinement is required to ensure clinical reliability without compromising quantitative accuracy or anatomical details.

Related

  1. Comparison of 2D and 3D fast non-local means in pediatric abdominal low-dose computed tomographic image
    Minji Park, Hajin Kim, Hyun-Woo Jeong +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Case Report: Bilateral pes planovalgus: an uncommon pediatric orthopedic presentation of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 4B1
    Hamad Ali Alkhunayfir, Rahaf Hamad Alrasheed, Abdelhamid Elshahid Hassan +1
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Computed Tomographic Features Associated with Pulmonary Melioidosis versus Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Diabetic Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.
    Nitin Gupta, Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay, Tirlangi Praveen Kumar +7
    The American journal of tropical medicine and hygienePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. A case report of osilodrostat treatment in primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia associated with bilateral adrenal mass reduction.
    Wenwei Xie, Wenqiong Xu
    Journal of medical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJPMC
  5. Motor alignment and sensory outcomes in pediatric patients with basic-type intermittent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recession-resection.
    Merve Simsek, Mehmet Cem Sabaner, Nida Yunlu +3
    BMC ophthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{park2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Analysis of Bilateral-Based Noise Reduction Algorithms in Low-Dose Pediatric Computed Tomographic Images.}},
  author = {Minji Park and Hajin Kim and Sang Woong Park and Min-Hee Lee and Youngjin Lee},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193186},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882341},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Analysis of Bilateral-Based Noise Reduction Algorithms in Low-Dose Pediatric Computed Tomographic Images.
AU  - Minji Park
AU  - Hajin Kim
AU  - Sang Woong Park
AU  - Min-Hee Lee
AU  - Youngjin Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193186
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882341
AB  - Background: Noise reduction in low-dose pediatric computed tomography (CT) requires effective suppression of quantum noise without compromising subtle anatomical structures. This study compared three bilateral-based noise reduction algorithms, namely the conventional bilateral filter (BF), adaptive BF (ABF), and trainable BF (TBF), using eight low-dose pediatric abdominal CT cases. Methods: Denoising performance was evaluated in the axial and coronal planes through visual assessment and quantitative measurements of the coefficient of variation (CV) within the liver parenchyma and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the liver and portal vein. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Friedman test, followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-adjustment. All three methods reduced the visible noise present in the original images. Results: ABF improved uniformity in homogeneous liver regions while preserving anatomical detail, whereas TBF produced the strongest apparent noise suppression but introduced greater blurring and occasional ambiguous structures. Quantitatively, the CV decreased progressively from BF to ABF and TBF. The TBF method achieved the lowest average CV and the highest average CNR. Significant differences were observed among the four conditions for both metrics in each imaging plane. However, CNR differences between the three denoising methods were less consistent, particularly for comparisons involving TBF. Conclusions: Overall, ABF provided a favorable balance between noise reduction and structural preservation, whereas TBF offered stronger image specific denoising with additional concerns regarding signal fidelity and reproducibility. Further refinement is required to ensure clinical reliability without compromising quantitative accuracy or anatomical details.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -